Are you against Christian Sharia Law?

1. Property rights. They have the right to build a house of worship on a piece of property that they own where there is no legal reason that would prevent them (note the key word here is "legal" meaning "having to do with the law". the opinions of people who oppose, distrust and/or hate them is not a legal reason).

2. Presumed innocence (you may know this as "innocence until proven guilty"). You accusing them as being guilty of all sorts of terrible crimes. Of course, under the law they are innocent of any of these crimes until they are convicted by a court with due process.

3., 4. and 5. Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Association and Due process rights. All guaranteed by the US Constitution and protected by our Judicial branch (see the 1st 4th and 5th amendments in the link I posted).

I didn't move anything.

You have now jumped to assuming everyone who is anti drugs is a Christian.

You haven't used any drugs, at least that's what you claim. Therefore I can assume you are a Christian.

Quote:

2. Presumed innocence (you may know this as "innocence until proven guilty"). You accusing them as being guilty of all sorts of terrible crimes. Of course, under the law they are innocent of any of these crimes until they are convicted by a court with due process.

Had any muslim been denied this right, then papers would be full of muslims sentenced to prison without a trial. I have not heard of any such thing, but if you can provide an example, then I would accept your point that muslims in the US have been denied this right. Just because someone accuses a muslim (or anyone else) of something does not mean they have been denied this right.

November 5, 2001, the DOJ reported that it had detained 1,182 people as part of the official investigation into the 9/11 attacks. Since that announcement, the government has failed to give any further accounting of the number of people it held for purposes of investigating the 9/11 attacks. The perception that Arab, Muslim, Sikh, or South Asian Americans could be instantly “disappeared” by the federal government under the pretense of the 9/11 investigation created a great deal of panic and disruption, according to advocacy organizations like CAIR. The actual number of people detained without criminal charge as “material witnesses” to the 9/11 investigation, almost all of whom are presumably Arab, Muslim, Sikh or South Asian, is unknown. In 2009, a federal court ruled (in Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft) that former attorney general John Ashcroft may personally be held liable for wrongful detention as a result of these policies. The Supreme Court took up this case in 2010 and is expected to rule shortly.

So you go back 10 years, to just after the 9/11 attacks to find that some people were detained during a criminal investigation of the attacks. You or I could be detained in the same manner during a criminal investigation. This is in no way proof that their right presumption of innocence was taken away. Give me a break.

Good luck with that one. People on the left continually forget that an act war changes everything. Investigating people during war is not taking away their rights.

Now read your last post until you understand your own words. You did exactly the same thing by ASSUMING that everyone who passes a bill that you THINK is Christian law is automatically voted on by only Christians.

You really are one very confused person. That's why you keep going in circles.

If I was suspected of making war on the USA, I would expect Obama to investigate me. Wouldn't you?

If I was suspected of making war on the USA, I would expect Obama to investigate me. Wouldn't you?