0
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ VI

 
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 08:14 am
"Nation-Building 101" (Francis Fukuyama, The Atlantic, from the January/February 2004 issue)
"The problems that the Administration faced in Iraq were not so much the results of specific misjudgments as the predictable by-products of the Administration's poorly thought-out institutional structure. Fixing that structure would involve at least four things.
First, the United States needs to create a central authority, backed by a permanent staff, to manage ongoing and future nation-building activities. One possibility, recommended by the Commission on Post-conflict Reconstruction of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, is to appoint a director of reconstruction. ...
A standing U.S. government office to manage nation-building will be a hard sell politically, because we are still unreconciled to the idea that we are in the nation-building business for the long haul. However, international relations is no longer just a game played between great powers but one in which what happens inside smaller countries can have a huge effect on the rest of the world. Our "empire" may be a transitional one grounded in democracy and human rights, but our interests dictate that we learn how better to teach other people to govern themselves."
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 08:16 am
Meanwhile British troops were sent into battle without the proper equipment. In an effort to save money the Just in Time logistics program was introduced. But it proved just too late to save the life of Sergeant Steve Roberts who was shot in the chest and not wearing kevlar ceramic body armor. He was ordered to give his body armor to an infantryman, deemed in greater need.

There were enough armor plates to go round, but they hadn't arrived at the front line. Why? Because Blair delayed pressing the "go" button for fear of upsetting Labour mps whilst he was trying to get the second UN resolution and saying "War is not inevitable and no decisions have yet been made". Moving kit to the front would give the lie to this statement.

So when the decision was made, stuff had to be shipped very quickly. Just too late for Sergeant Roberts.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/01/16/1073878032654.html

Should the commanding officer have refused to attack on the grounds that they had not yet received all their kit?
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 08:32 am
I heard some interviews on NPR with some younger Iraqi students who seemed to be well educated. Their idea of a leader would not be Sistani or any other religious based type, they want a more independent leader.

Seems the situation is somewhat like Iran in that the youth have a different vision for their country than the elders.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 09:28 am
Brand X wrote:
I heard some interviews on NPR with some younger Iraqi students who seemed to be well educated. Their idea of a leader would not be Sistani or any other religious based type, they want a more independent leader.

Seems the situation is somewhat like Iran in that the youth have a different vision for their country than the elders.


Brand, maybe this will be of help .... Sistani is anti theocracy .......

Click me
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 09:44 am
There is an extensive amount of religion in his resume, could cause some doubts about his current stance.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 10:08 am
Brand X wrote:
There is an extensive amount of religion in his resume, could cause some doubts about his current stance.


What could he possibly aspire to? His life has been the pursuit of wisdom. Now at 70 years of age he would want to be President?
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 10:13 am
Don't think so, but if his influence takes hold then a certain type of government could be formed, in turn as the youth become more involved a new one will be filtered in later.

Maybe this is how it should transition at this time, seems there isn't much choice either.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 10:25 am
I'm afraid there will be more to it .... he has Bush and the Sunnis and Kurds to deal with. Bremmer is in Washington as we speak .... look for operation rubber hammer or whatever.

A spot of civil war is a posibility
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 09:28 pm
This is so good.

I read Ge and BrandX talking calmly and cooly about what Sistani might want and could do.

He is a major force. Maybe the only major force. So what do we do with him? I cannot imagine and I wonder if we have any idea how he will play out and if he is a player at all.

We are dancing around Sistanti. This whole scene is fascinating. Does this guy have us in his grip? If he is charismatic, then why not install him as a figurehead until we can count voters and do an election? Why can we not come to some compromise between Sistani's direct elections and our indirect caucus-type elections that we support because it seems that voter counts are not able to be come by for months due to simple can't count-em on the ground stuff?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 10:41 pm
A good discussion on Sistani on PBS newshour tonight. It'll be available online.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 10:49 pm
Sistani is no fool, he knows exactly wherer he is in the food chain. And what's morer, sodoes Bush. IIve been getting updates on him since late summer .... a chessmaste ssuperb...
Here is the most recent:

WHEN Sistani speaks, Bush listens
Asia Times Online, Hong Kong
... It is that quiet Shi'ite cleric who is seldom seen in public, and who
does not grant any interviews, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Husseini al-Sistani.
... Sistani supporters take to streets in call for elections -
The Times (subscription) Bremer: US plan for giving Iraqis control
can be revised, ..
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FA17Ak02.html

You can set up your own at:

http://www.google.com/newsalerts
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jan, 2004 10:58 pm
Here is Sistani's web site in english. He stopped taking questions awhile ago, prob got to be too much for him.

http://www.sistani.org/html/eng/

What time tonight Blatham?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 12:54 am
Link to that PBS site with the discussion about al-Sistani:

TROUBLED TRANSITION
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 08:46 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Link to that PBS site with the discussion about al-Sistani:

TROUBLED TRANSITION


Thanks Walter...
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 09:12 am
OK, now what ..... will George follow through with his stated intent of a free Iraq or ......... cover his own arse by continuing on his 're-election time table which, barrinng unforseen circumstances, should bring him certain defeat..
Quote:
istani Ups The Stakes Against U.S.

Friday, January 16 2004 @ 10:44 PM Eastern Standard Time
Contributed by: Admin
Views: 261

KARBALA, Iraq, January 16- In what could be a major challenge to the U.S. Authority in Iraq, the most influential Shiite scholar, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, threatened Friday, January16 , protests and a strike if the U.S.-led occupation authority did not back down from its plan to form an Iraqi government without direct elections.

"In the coming days, we are going to see protests and strikes and perhaps a confrontation with the occupying force if it insists on its colonial plans and designing the country's politics for its own interests," said Sheikh Abdel Mahdi al-Karbalai, Sistani's representative in the Shiite holy city of Karbala, according to Agence France-Presse (AFP).

"We tell you to support the Marja's call for general elections. The Marja will do all in its power to stop those who would throw away the rights of the Iraqi people and will not give up its cause," he told a crowd of hundreds.

Karbalai used the term Marja to refer to the elite group of scholars, headed by Sistani, to whom Iraq's strong Shiites - so far not adopting confrontational stance against the occupation - look to for spiritual guidance.

Karbalai, like other top aides to Sistani, often delivers the scholar's teaching in sermons Friday, the Islamic world's traditional day of rest.

His words had added significance as they were delivered at the Shrine of Hussein, one of Shiite Islam's holiest sites, 110 kilometers (68 miles) south of Baghdad, the burial site of the Muslim prophet Mohammed's grandson, Hussein.

Sistani has demanded general elections before Washington returns sovereignty in less than six months time.

In the south, in Basra, thousands of Shiites showed their solidarity with 73 -year-old Sistani Thursday, demonstrating against the U.S. plans for erecting a national government without conducting polls.

Bremer has said there is not enough time to hold elections before a handover of sovereignty due to lack of electoral registers and polling laws.

On Thursday, an aide to Sistani told Reuters in Kuwait that if the scholar formally rejected the U.S. plan, Iraqis would never support it.

"If (Sistani) issues a fatwa (edict) all the Iraqi people will go out in protest marches and demonstrations against the coalition forces," Ayatollah Mohammad Baqer al-Mohri said.

Tens of thousands of Iraqis took to the streets of the southern city of Basra, in support of Sistani's demand on Thursday.

And another top Shiite leader wrote to the U.S. President and British Prime Minister Tony Blair questioning their sincerity over the transfer of power to the Iraqis.

Hojat Al-Islam Ali Abdulhakim Alsafi said the transition plan had more to do with U.S. elections than Iraqi interests.

Sunni imams joined forces with Shiites in the speeches of Friday prayers in Baghdad and other Iraqi areas.

With the announcement in November of the occupation's decision to establish an independent Iraq by July 1 without holding elections, Sistani has dug in his heels.

Last Sunday, he appeared to slam the door shut on compromise, telling a delegation from the handpicked U.S.-led Governing Council that there was no good reason not to hold polls to choose the nation's next leaders.

He insisted elections could be held in the coming months.

Since then, Bremer's team and the Council have looked at ways to expand their proposed regional caucus system - under a November 15 agreement - for selecting the transitional government.

But the two sides' relations have never been more tense.

U.N. Mission

Sistani's threat came as an Iraqi official delegation headed to the United Nations Friday for talks on the country's future.

The delegation includes president of U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council (IGC) Adnan Pachachi and Foreign Minister Hoshiar Zibari.

U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan will meet with Pachachi and U.S. civil administrator Paul Bremer Monday, January19 , for talks on the U.N.'s return to the country, Zibari was quoted by Agence France-Presse (AFP) as saying.

"We are going to hear what the United Nations has to say more than anything else because the invitation is coming from them," Zebari said, shortly before departure from a U.S. military facility at Baghdad's international airport.

"The starting point in my opinion is the return of the United Nations to Iraq and the reopening of its office," he said.

Annan pulled non-Iraqi U.N. staff out of the country after attacks on aid agencies, including a bombing which killed the senior U.N. official in Iraq, Sergio Vieira de Mello, and 21 others at the world body's Baghdad headquarters in August.

Washington, which went to invade Iraq without the backing of most of the Security Council, has for months resisted a wider U.N. role in post-invasion Iraq.

But it is now trying to persuade the United Nations to return to Iraq to in the hope that this will persuade Iraqis to back a widely-rejected power transferred plan.

More Deaths

The situation on the ground is also dented with tension, as three people were killed and two others wounded late Thursday when a university bus carrying students struck an explosive device near Tikrit.

The U.S. military said Friday that three Iraqi civilians were injured when resistance fighters fired rocket-propelled grenades at a U.S. troops in the flashpoint town of Fallujah earlier this week.

Police in the northern town of Mosul said two officer were injured Thursday in the latest attacks on law enforcers in the city.

A plane carrying Georgia's Defense Minister David Tevzadze was shot at as it took off from Baghdad's airport to return to the Caucasus country overnight, but no one was hurt in the attack, officials said Friday.

"The plane made a maneuver and coalition helicopters opened return fire," Koba Kobaladze, Georgia's national guard chief traveling with the minister, told reporters upon returning to Tbilisi.

Tevzadze flew to Iraq for one day to inspect Georgian soldiers who are serving as part of the US-led peacekeeping force there.

Georgia sent 70 elite troops, doctors and mine-clearing experts to Iraq in August. They are due to return in February, to be replaced by200 troops who will include special forces.

Anti-American sentiments are rising among ordinary Iraqis, as may call for an end to occupation and return of the situation to normal in the oil-rich country.

Hundreds of people took to the streets of the southern city of Amara on January11 , a day after six Iraqis were killed when British troops and Iraqi police opened fire on a job rally.


ource
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 10:04 am
Quote:
will George follow through with his stated intent of a free Iraq or ......... cover his own arse by continuing on his 're-election time table which, barrinng unforseen circumstances, should bring him certain defeat..


Ge, I fear the worst, here. I think that GWB will find a way, somehow, to have photos on TV of a government being installed (no matter what kind)and a long line of US troops getting on the planes to go home by this summer. This will be added to his long line of accomplishments such as The Vision Thing, a pie-in-the-sky journey to Mars that he will never have to find funding for; Sop to the Right in the form of strong support for a marriage amendment that will somehow, as he shrugs his shoulders in pretended dismay, never get through Congress or to a referendum; Sop to the Left, (which will not cause much of a problem from his Well-Fed extreme right) his dramatic and ill-considered nor thought-out three-year plan for illegal immigrants meant to boost his support from Hispanics. This guy is a political animal of the highest order, and he knows that his reelection depends on voters seeing the troops coming home from Iraq, not on a patient and well-wrought plan for a workable government in that country because that accomplishment would take real vision and statesmanship and could not be finished in time for this summer's sound bites.

I would be only too happy to be proven wrong about him.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 10:56 am
Kara

You won't be proven wrong. Even David Brooks, on PBS news last evening, pointed to the the similarity in the experiences of O'Neill and DiIluio - that this administration is pretty much bereft of any concern with discussion on or concern for policy, and that politics and the election drive nearly all that goes on in the white house.

Today, we find out that the Hubble will die as a consequence of this jerk riding the coattails of the successful Mars Spirit program so that he can pretend he actually gives a fuk about science.

You really really have to get rid of this idiot and his ring.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 11:06 am
He is a flim flam man that is sure of his invincibility, his strings are pulled by the politicians. An old pool hall saying ..... you can shear a sheep a thousand times but you can only skin him once. Bush has made too many enemies, skinned too many people, they are in the wings waiting for revenge .... people like Nick Smith.

Bush is losing his grip on the media coverage on dissent.......... right now he Bush message is assumed to be fact because it is the only message out there, look for more of these.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/jan2004/bush-j17.shtml

What has Bush to offer Sistani?
One man one vote .... maybe it will catch on over here Wink
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 12:33 pm
In the case of Iraq, it is likely to be one man, one vote, one time. Sad I'm afraid the Bush administration is planning on a similar event here. Shocked
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2004 12:58 pm
Sistani has a militia, no one knows for sure the number, lets just say that out of 25 million followers 1 million are militia. Sistani listed direct confrontation with the 'coalition' as a posibility if the elections are delayed or blocked.
What are Bush's chances at the polls if on November 1'st those 1 million are turned loose?

I don't think Sistani is kiddding.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/05/2024 at 02:01:25