34
   

The worlds first riddle!

 
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 11:18 am
[size=8]LARGEST KNOWN PRIME PALINDROME
150007 digits (as of Jan.)
[/size]
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 12:36 pm
markr wrote:
Let me restate the question:

What's the smallest palindromic prime number (base 10) greater than 11 with an even number of digits?




In base ten, 11 is the only palindromic prime with an even number of digits. ~ You are a tricky dickie!


BTW did you notice a friend of yours paid a visit, is it your turn to carry out the medical?



Last night Shari and I were having a heated discussion over; What is the largest number that cannot be written as a sum of distinct numbers whose reciprocals sum to 1 Question

Can anyone assist?
0 Replies
 
shari6905
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 02:29 pm
Our heated "discussion" had nothing to do with that! As I recall, it was something about the amount of clothing articles that were accumulated on the the floor of your bachelor pad after our bout with a deck of cards.
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 03:30 pm
shari6905 wrote:
Our heated "discussion" had nothing to do with that! As I recall, it was something about the amount of clothing articles that were accumulated on the the floor of your bachelor pad after our bout with a deck of cards.
Embarrassed



I knew it had something to do with sum ?'Reciprocated' to one, when you raised two pair Razz
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 04:29 pm
Tryagain wrote:
In base ten, 11 is the only palindromic prime with an even number of digits.

Yes - it was a trick question.

Tryagain wrote:
BTW did you notice a friend of yours paid a visit, is it your turn to carry out the medical?

Huh?

Tryagain wrote:
What is the largest number that cannot be written as a sum of distinct numbers whose reciprocals sum to 1?

Do you mean:
What is the largest integer that cannot be written as a sum of distinct integers whose reciprocals sum to 1, or are all real numbers allowed?
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 04:53 pm
"Huh?"

Butterfly called by! Razz

"Do you mean:"

The former (it's a two digit number) with NO tricks Laughing
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 10:21 pm
[size=8]RECIPROCALS SUM TO ONE
I would never have gotten this without the 2-digit hint. I modified a program that prints all partitions of a number to consider only partitions with distinct elements. I summed the reciprocals and checked for a total of one. Because of your hint, I started at 99 and worked backward.
The closest you can get with 77 is 1.0000009.

Do you know of a proof that 77 is the max?
[/size]
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 May, 2006 10:23 pm
Tryagain wrote:
Butterfly called by!


Yes, I noticed. What's up with "bookmark?"
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 08:14 am
Mark:

LONG ROPE
You could probably lift it about 8 feet (depends on how tall you are). Laughing Laughing Laughing

It can be lifted 13.4257 feet. Cool Cool



From goal post to goal post is 120 yards = 360 feet.
From one goal post to the 50 yard line is 180 feet.
If one foot is added to the roap, then the total length is 361 feet.
When I lift the rope at the 50 yard line it forms two right triangles
The hypotenuse of each right triangle is 180.5 feet and the base is 180feet.
Use Pythagorean Theorem to solve for height.
(180.5)^2 = (180)^2 +h^2
32,580.25=32,400 +h^2
h^2 = 180.5
h = 13.4257 feet.


It's even more incredible when you figure that by adding only 1 inch, you can then lift it: 46.48 inches! At the fifty yard line.




What is the smallest number with multiplicative persistence of 11?
SUPER BOWL
277777788888899 Cool Cool





What may I ask is the smallest number (besides 1) which is one less than twice it's reverse
REVERSE * 2 - 1
73 Cool



What is the largest ?'proven' palindromic prime


LARGEST KNOWN PRIME PALINDROME
150007 digits (as of Jan. Cool )


Keep up to date dude;

February 2, 2006

Harvey Dubner retakes the palindromic prime record
10^150008 + 4798974 * 10^75001 + 1

Congratulations with this number of 150009 digits! Razz




What is the largest integer that cannot be written as a sum of distinct integers whose reciprocals sum to 1


RECIPROCALS SUM TO ONE
I would never have gotten this without the 2-digit hint. I modified a program that prints all partitions of a number to consider only partitions with distinct elements. I summed the reciprocals and checked for a total of one. Because of your hint, I started at 99 and worked backward.

(You are a darn genius) 2 Cents


The closest you can get with 77 is 1.0000009. Cool Cool


Do you know of a proof that 77 is the max?


(Strangely enough, I cannot find one anywhere. Although 77 is accepted as the correct answer, it must have been proved by someone. I will enquire further)




(Butterfly called by!)

"Yes, I noticed. What's up with "bookmark?""


I was going to ask you the same question. Perhaps she was offering a gift, as in; Do you want a book Mark?







I know this is hard to believe, but: When I got back last night I found Butterfly and Shari sitting in the spa tub arguing over the number of three digit palindromic primes.

As you can imagine I did not want to take sides, and in any event, I thought them both wrong. Can anyone assist in the total number of palindromic primes consisting of three digits Question

Thank you.
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 May, 2006 09:48 pm
[size=8]THREE-DIGIT PALINDROMIC PRIMES
101, 131, 151, 181, 191
313, 353, 373, 383
727, 757, 787, 797
919, 929

That makes 15.
[/size]
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 May, 2006 11:37 am
Mark:


THREE-DIGIT PALINDROMIC PRIMES
101, 131, 151, 181, 191
313, 353, 373, 383
727, 757, 787, 797
919, 929

That makes 15. Cool Cool


Thank you for the total; it would appear at first glance that the ladies were right. I shall not glance again. Laughing



There I was, stripped to the waist down at the old forge, sweat running freely in the face of the searing heat, when Butterfly whispered, "The year 2002 is a palindrome." I barely had time to digest this little gem when, Shari leaned over and said, "So was the year 1991."

Ho-Hum you say? Well, through the white hot heat the sparks really flew as I hammered away until it occurred to me to ask:


a) When was the previous occurrence of two palindromic years in one person's average lifetime Question

b) When will the next be Question

c) What is the next normal palindromic year Question
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 May, 2006 02:45 pm
Observant readers may remember crafty Mark's riddle:


?'smeteltoumies'

(The proper noun in my puzzle is much more commonly known (although it does include an abbreviation). The proper noun is the name of a city.)


This is driving me crazy, I can come up with;

OMIT ME(in)SALUTES

MA (in) SEMI OUTLETS


These are undoubtedly incorrect. Can anyone come up with the answer?
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 01:21 am
[size=8]PALINDROMIC YEARS
a) 999, 1001 (could also include some of 919, 929, 939, 949, 959, 969, 979, and 989)
b) 2992, 3003
c) 2112
[/size]

smeteltoumies
It's a midwestern city.
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 07:32 am
Mark:


PALINDROMIC YEARS
a) 999, 1001 (could also include some of 919, 929, 939, 949, 959, 969, 979, and 989) Cool
b) 2992, 3003 Cool
c) 2112 Cool


Thanks Mark, I owe you big time.






I had to laugh when Shari challenged me to a ?'truth or dare' match. I stopped laughing when she said, "I'll go first".


What is the smallest abundant number that is not the sum of some subset of its divisors Question



Note: An abundant number is a positive integer n for which:
S (n) = sigma (n) - n > n

(The first few abundant numbers are 12, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, ... Abundant numbers are sometimes known as; Excessive numbers.)

Fearing ridicule, I told her I had to return some overdue library books and I would answer upon my return. Please help, what is the friggin number. I may be onto a good thing here!
0 Replies
 
owlette
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 08:47 am
Tryagain wrote:
Observant readers may remember crafty Mark's riddle:


?'smeteltoumies'

(The proper noun in my puzzle is much more commonly known (although it does include an abbreviation). The proper noun is the name of a city.)


This is driving me crazy, I can come up with;

OMIT ME(in)SALUTES

MA (in) SEMI OUTLETS


These are undoubtedly incorrect. Can anyone come up with the answer?


[size=7]St Louis[/size]

Quote:
I had to laugh when Shari challenged me to a ?'truth or dare' match. I stopped laughing when she said, "I'll go first".


What is the smallest abundant number that is not the sum of some subset of its divisors



Note: An abundant number is a positive integer n for which:
S (n) = sigma (n) - n > n

(The first few abundant numbers are 12, 18, 20, 24, 30, 36, ... Abundant numbers are sometimes known as; Excessive numbers.)

Fearing ridicule, I told her I had to return some overdue library books and I would answer upon my return. Please help, what is the friggin number. I may be onto a good thing here!


[size=7]The number 70[/size]
0 Replies
 
markr
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 10:27 am
owlette: That's the city, but not the complete solution.
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 12:10 pm
Li'l Owl, a.k.a. Owlette, may I thank you for your most timely intervention. Cool You will undoubtedly be blamed for saving what's left of my sanity, and for that; I will be eternally grateful. By eternally, I mean; for a day or two.

"That's the city, but not the complete solution." Shocked

I must admit I would never have come up with the answer. However, once you take the city out of the equation could you not meet me halfway?

Great problem Mark. Razz




SOALUCTIIDON
0 Replies
 
owlette
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 05:36 pm
Could it possibly be:

[size=7]ACID (in) SOLUTION[/size]
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 06:10 pm
Damn! I mean congratulations Li'l Owl, you are good. Razz
However, this one should slow you down a bit.

Question:

1/6 of a sheep =



Due to circumstances beyond my control Butterfly is excluded form giving an answer. (Again) Laughing
0 Replies
 
owlette
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 May, 2006 06:21 pm
Well I think you fleeced me this time! Laughing
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Alternative Einstein's riddle answer - Discussion by cedor
Urgent !!! Puzzle / Riddle...Plz helpp - Question by zuzusheryl
Bottle - Question by Megha
"The World's Hardest Riddle" - Discussion by maxlovesmarie
Riddle me this - Question by gree012
riddle me this (easy) - Question by gree012
Riddle me this - Question by gree012
Hard Riddle - Question by retsgned
Riddle Time - Question by Teddy Isaiah
Riddle - Question by georgio7
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 03/28/2026 at 10:41:54