Reply																		
							Sat  8 Jan, 2011 08:00 am
						
						
					
					
					
						He is a former Commissioner of Police.
He was a former Commissioner of Police.
He was a Commissioner of Police.
What is the difference in meaning between the above sentences? 
Thanks.
					
				 
				
						
														
					
													@tanguatlay,
												I'd say the second one is incorrect.
The first and third are fine and have equivalent meanings.  
											
 
					
				 
																									
						
														
					
													@sozobe,
												The second works if he is dead.
											
 
					
				 
																
						
														
					
													@engineer,
												True.  I was going to say it's still redundant, but I guess "he was a commissioner of police" in that context implies that he had the job when he died.  "He was a former commissioner of police" implies that he had been commissioner in the past but no longer held the job when he died.