68
   

The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House

 
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  5  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2011 03:57 pm
@blueveinedthrobber,
The Big Party aka The American Dream need not be over.

The decline and fall of the American Empire is not a given of fate, destiny or history.

I feel certain that you appreciate that many if not most Americans who now enjoy affluent live-styles didn't inherit them from their parents.

I hope you appreciate that many of the currently affluent Americans achieved their current status by virtue of hard work and prior sacrifice.

Sometimes you try real hard and yet you lose. Everyone cannot be a winner. Most of the people who are perceived to have won, earned their success. They probably should better appreciate the influence of good fortune, but they're not pigs because they don't.

Good health is more valuable than wealth, and if you've regained it, you've won.

Good on you.

0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2011 04:06 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
I can't say I entirely disagree either, and I think it's irrelevant who or what is primarily responsible.

The pain ahead of us, however, will be determined by those who are determined to fight the good fight to the end.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2011 04:45 pm
@JPB,


It finally looks like the republicans are determined to fight the good fight to the end.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2011 06:06 pm
@H2O MAN,
don't bother trying to bait
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 Jul, 2011 06:07 pm
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

I can't say I entirely disagree either, and I think it's irrelevant who or what is primarily responsible.

The pain ahead of us, however, will be determined by those who are determined to fight the good fight to the end.


Problem is the irrelevant blaming strategy is the only one the majority of not just the USA but the Worlds population is capable on maintaining thoughout history.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Mon 25 Jul, 2011 09:33 pm
@JPB,
JPB wrote:

I can't say I entirely disagree either, and I think it's irrelevant who or what is primarily responsible.

The pain ahead of us, however, will be determined by those who are determined to fight the good fight to the end.


Identifying who or what is responsible is of no value if it will be used only for the purposes of political castigation, but it is exremely relevant if one wants to develop a solution.

You can't solve a problem unless you know how it was caused.

There is pain endured in a good and productive fight, and there is pain endured in a feckless fight that makes the problem worse.

Case in point: Our current economic woes may or may not have been exacerbated by the Democrats' stimulus package.

There are plenty of respected (at least by some) people who today argue that the failure of the stimulus package was that it was not bold enough; more tax money should have been spent.

Don't we need to know, or at least agree upon, what has caused our economic woes before we can fashion a solution?

If the competing solutions are spend no more money and spend lots more money, it seems that consensus is required.

0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2011 04:42 am
When economic experts are in complete disagreement on the causes and solutions of economic problems, then it falls to politicians who enact solutions based on political expediency rather than economic engineering. Brinksmanship in negotiation is how politicians decide things, and that's what we're seeing now with the debt ceiling crisis.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2011 10:14 am
@rosborne979,
True; and they don't have a clue on the damage they are doing to the world economy.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 07:30 am


How Secretary of State positions are currently held by liberals?
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 07:37 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



How Secretary of State positions are currently held by liberals?

Could you make that an intelligent question rather than just a bunch of words strung together which have no rational meaning as you have assembled them?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 08:15 am


How many Secretary of State positions are currently held by liberals?
parados
 
  3  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 08:23 am
@H2O MAN,
The answer is 42.

Are you sure you asked the right question?
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 08:42 am
@parados,


I'm not questioning your answer, but I would like to
see the source and find out when they were elected.

Thanks.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:04 am
@H2O MAN,
The US only has one Secretary of State. The Sec of State is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

Did you really think there was more than one?




You might want to google "the number 42" but don't forget to take your towel with you.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:07 am
@parados,
Perhaps you missed the 's' that denoted the concept of quantity.
I am asking about the political affiliation of the person that holds the position of secretary of each and every state.

There are 50 states, not 57 like Obama thinks there are.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:23 am
@H2O MAN,
Considering this is a thread for a FEDERAL office, why would I suspect you weren't be your usual uninformed self spurt?

But if you are talking states, then there are 44 states with sec of states and none of them are affiliated with the Liberal party.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:29 am
@parados,


None of the 44 are democrats, all 44 are republicans?
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:39 am
@H2O MAN,
You asked if they were of the liberal party...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party
parados
 
  2  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:41 am
@parados,
All 47 (including 3 sec of commonwealth) are far left based on Obama being "far left."
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Thu 28 Jul, 2011 09:52 am
@parados,
parados wrote:

All 47 (including 3 sec of commonwealth) are far left based on Obama being "far left."


Source please.
Thanks
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 4.16 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 07:10:06