The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House

The church has already gone a long way towards falling apart. Frank above is correct - this is mostly about Catholic church leaders desperately trying to maintain control over their own parishioners.

You don't know tax-loss carryforwards get wiped out in a Chapter 11 filing?

I think that having celibate men make decisions on contraception is pure idiocy.

Quote:

The church has already gone a long way towards falling apart. Frank above is correct - this is mostly about Catholic church leaders desperately trying to maintain control over their own parishioners.

What Frank said above wasn't worth a banana. It was an assertion. As is your silly statement.

In view of the fact that your are all perfectly free to do what you wish in regard to contraception it is obvious that your obsession with the matter has something to do with an insecurity on the matter. As if you are trying to persuade yourselves.

Mr Obama, as I understand it, and I've not being paying that much attention to another American controversy, was requiring people who have a conscience about artificial birth control to be a party to supplying others with the kits. An animal loving vegetarian being forced to take a job sharpening knives for butchers sort of thing.

Mr Obama's proposal being nothing but an electioneering gambit. All reactions predicted in the meetings prior to the announcement.

What Frank said above wasn't worth a banana. It was an assertion.

…you will find that ladies can protect themselves in a variety of ways all of which are natural and require no intervention by business interests.

Oh, right.

Quote:

Oh, right.

Yeah, right. Alfred Adler covered the point in Understanding Human Nature.

What do you mean by progress Cyclo. More women in convenience mode? Being poisoned.

Why isn't marijuana legal. That can be medically beneficial? And once you get official handouts of it you have Huxley's Soma.

You're a very well conditioned beta minus Cyclo.

What a silly thing to say that is Frank.

They either chose not to use the natural methods in order to have a baby or they didn't know how to use them. How can they have had a kid if they used them? Are you saying they don't work? If so it is an admission. They do work.

The fact that you place inverted commas around natural says enough for me.

The Catholic bishops are not trying to impose anything.

They are offering a point of view.

You needn't accept it. Neither does anybody else. They know that.

You're giving your ego a little fondling by imagining that people are being imposed upon in ways you are smart enough not to fall for.

That they are mugs. Dream on.

WHat I was reaching for was the fact that, today, we cant even ask why an applicant left his or her previous jobe because thats a privacy issue.

A person can choose not to have intercourse…and no pregnancies will ensue. Any other attempt at what people like you call “natural methods” are problematic at best…and the evidence shows that unwanted pregnancies are more easily avoided using non-“natural method” methods. If you have trouble understanding that, the problem lies with your comprehension, not the methods.

Well until the day a man can biologically have a baby out of his own body, a woman can decide whether she wants to have a baby or not. A man in a marriage can not force a woman to have a baby nor should he be able to. Luckily we are not in the middle ages anymore.