68
   

The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House

 
 
revelette
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:31 am
Here's an interesting article about Newt. (least I found it so)

Newt Gingrich's big, slobbering mutual love affair with the elite media

Quote:
Newt Gingrich hates the media, right? He unloaded on John King at the Charleston debate for raising this issue of his ex-wife's allegations, blasting the 'destructive, vicious, negative nature of much of the news media'. In Myrtle Beach, he slapped Juan Williams down for asking a race-based question.

And the media despises Newt, right? He's so sarcastic and condescending towards us, brands us as elite liberals and uses us to whip up the Republican base.

Actually, wrong and wrong.

Gingrich loves the press. In some respects we are, as John McCain famously noted, his 'base'. He craves the media.

I've never seen a man so happy as Gingrich was when he ambled into the spin room in Myrtle Beach last Monday night and about 200 of us swarmed around him hanging on his every word.

Romney would have rather been anywhere else in the world than that in the middle of that heaving, sweaty scrum. But Newt was in pure heaven. He loves the game.


And it's mutual. The press laps up all things Newt. Like him, we thrive on chaos. He's a walking quote machine. You never know what he'll say next and he can't resist answering a question or engaging with a reporter.

Just as every Romney event seems basically the same, every Gingrich event is different.

Bob Dole once quipped that the most dangerous place to be in Washington was between a camera and Senator Chuck Schumer.

The same could be said of Gingrich. You ask him a question, he'll invariably turn on his heels and advance towards you.


There is more at the source. But if Gingrich gets the nomination, I expect more fireworks.

On the little mentioned Juan Williams and Gingrich thing:


Quote:
Juan Williams has been receiving quite a bit of attention in the aftermath of Monday night's GOP debate. Williams, who moderated the event, had a confrontational exchange with Newt Gingrich that earned him boos from the audience.

The Fox News contributor had raised criticism that Gingrich's comments about food stamps and poor children's work ethic were "intended to belittle the poor and racial minorities." Gingrich had said that if invited to speak to the NAACP, he would urge black people to demand paychecks instead of food stamps. Williams asked, "Can't you see that this is viewed at a minimum as insulting to all Americans, but particularly to black Americans?"

On Tuesday's "The Five," he explained why he asked the question. When co-host Eric Bolling insisted that Gingrich's comments were about economics and not race, Williams disagreed. He said, "It's very racial and... unless i missed it, black people havent been out there demanding food stamps, or marching for food stamps."

"I don't think [Gingrich] answered the question at all," he said. Watch his explanation in the clip above.


links and video at the source

Gingrich has said something personal about Juan Williams in a continuation of the conversation I guess of this topic (I am not a fan of Williams.)

Quote:
Today, during a campaign stop in South Carolina, Gingrich recalled his exchange with Williams and used the same kind of suggestive language that Williams had objected to — this time directed at Williams himself:

GINGRICH: I had a very interesting dialogue Monday night in Myrtle Beach with Juan Williams about the idea of work, which seemed to Juan Williams to be a strange, distant concept.

Many pundits have seen racial undertones in Gingrich’s belittling of Williams during the debate. “That’s the way I like to spend my Martin Luther King, Jr. Day: watching Newt Gingrich sneer at Juan Williams, a black man, for having the temerity to ask him” a tough question, New York Times columnist Charles Blow wrote.

Gingrich’s equally insulting assessment of the debate exchange likely won’t help.


video at the source

0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:35 am


Newt Gingrich did not beat Mitt Romney …

Mitt Romney lost and Newt Gingrich beat the ObamaMedia.
revelette
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:42 am
@H2O MAN,
Oh yeah, the media really loves Obama. Rolling Eyes

Quote:
GREGORY: Can you have a Republican nominee who can play into the class warfare argument that the president wants to play in general?


source
parados
 
  3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:46 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



The T.E.A. party has picked Herman Cain to respond to PrezBO's state of the union campaign speech... must see TV for sure.

Are you talking about this Herman Cain?

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/colbertad-screen.jpg
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:49 am


“Responsibility from all” = “From each according to their ability.”

“Fairness for all” = “To each according to their needs.”


~ Barry Obama
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:50 am
@revelette,


Obamamedia loves Obama, and they really love the money he spends with them.
parados
 
  3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:53 am
@H2O MAN,
Why do you hate capitalism spurt?
H2O MAN
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 10:55 am
@parados,


It's Obama that hates capitalism, it goes against his Marxist convictions
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:08 am
re H2 Oboy,

Of course Obama does. That's why he got the economy functioning again, after years of the economic policies of conservatives trashed it. Again. Stop drinking that Boortz moonshine, H2O, you're getting the DTs
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:12 am
@MontereyJack,


You need to put down your Obama crack pipe Jkoff Boy, Obama has not done a single thing to improve the US economy.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:21 am
@H2O MAN,
First you argue that Obama is spending all this money with capitalist media companies.

Now you argue that he has nationalized those media companies?
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:23 am
@parados,


Parasite, what's left of your brain is not helping you here - go take yourself a much needed nap.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:24 am
@H2O MAN,
Are you saying Marxists spend more money than Capitalists?
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:38 am
H2 Oboy says:
Quote:
Obama has not done a single thing to improve the US economy.


What did you do, H2? Turn off your brain in 2008? The economic indicators have all improved since Obama took over. But of course you've never let the facts sway you, have you?

H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:39 am
@MontereyJack,
Drink that Kool-Aid fool.
parados
 
  3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 11:46 am
@H2O MAN,
So, Obama is a marxist that spends more money than capitalists when it comes to the media?

I don't think you know the meaning of "Marxist" Spurt.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 12:53 pm
@sozobe,
sozobe wrote:

Fox news HAS been good for something. Yay.

I say that blithely, but really, if Gingrich becomes the nominee I think that would be a wonderful thing for puncturing the Fox bubble.


Obama debates Gingrich without a teleprompter...

http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n233/glasscottage/Politics/ObamaTongueTied.jpg
farmerman
 
  4  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 01:25 pm
@H2O MAN,
In Obama's second term, I hope the ground swell that has begun against "Citizens United ..." will result in a constitutional amendment. Maybe this can be one way that Dems and Gop can find a common ground.

I think that spurt is part of the "Idiots SuperPAC"
revelette
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 01:28 pm
@H2O MAN,
Well, h2 guy, you just keep thinking that.

You better hope that Gingrich implodes before he is nominated. I think he shows all the signs of a someone with Bipolar Mania.

PERCEIVED GRANDIOSITY

0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 01:30 pm
@parados,
waterboy only knows one-liners that are not only lies, but are the very reverse of what he claims. A recent graph shows that GW Bush increased our deficit by over $5-trillion during his spending spree on two wars and tax cuts for the rich, while Obama spent $1-trillion giving tax breaks to the middle class and the poor and extended unemployment insurance - necessitated by GW Bush's Great Recession.

waterboy's one-liners just needs to be ignored; they don't contribute anything of value to any discussion.

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 03:38:37