68
   

The Republican Nomination For President: The Race For The Race For The White House

 
 
snood
 
  3  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 04:55 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

Still whistling in the dark ! Keep on reciting these Obama advantages: perhaps you'll even convince yourself.


Romney, Cain and Perry....
Why don't you regale us with all the advantages of your choice from among these three gems.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 05:07 pm
@snood,
Gems in the rough, perhaps. LOL
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 05:12 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
You obviously didn't take the point about the bargain $599.99 outboard motor Cyclo. Quality stuff can be made in sweatshops. It usually is because people who buy quality stuff are generally the tightest asses bastards of all.

Quality is the best value. Everybody knows that. I'll bet money you are not "blue collar" Cyclo.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 05:17 pm
@Joe Nation,
All that is obvious Joe. Tell us how best to suck eggs eh?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 05:18 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Surrey socialists are all three.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  2  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 05:27 pm
This is from Jimmy Fallon's show. A hilarious bit with Brian Williams and The Roots about the Occupy Wall Street movement...
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 05:28 pm
Still waiting to be regaled there, george.....
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 05:31 pm
What really happened when the war veteran received brain damage from the police!

Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 09:01 pm
@reasoning logic,
You know, posting this video once is OK, but you posted it like 12 different times. It's obnoxious.

If you're such a revolutionary firebrand, why aren't you on the front lines?

Ranting about OWS in an Internet forum is a pretty pathetic contribution to the cause.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Oct, 2011 09:04 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Do you think that they should be protesting Washington [the white house]?
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 01:54 pm
The St Petersburg Times reports that hotel managers in Tampa are being told to renegotiate contracts with the Republican National Committee for hotel rooms for attendees at the Repub Convention.
100 hotels with a combined 15,000 rooms agreed a year ago to provide the rooms for a minimum 5 night stay. The contract was between the RNC's Arrangement Committee when the now ousted Michael Steele was chairman of the committee.
The new chairman hired a company specializing in block booking of rooms. Hotel managers were assembled and told to not only lower the rates, but also to increase the $30 per room fee that would be given to the RNC. The new rate would be 10% of the total hotel bill for the 5 days.
One hotel, with a name which sounds to me to be swankier then Motel 6, signed a deal for 90% of its rooms to be reserved for convention goers for $160/night for 5 nights. The $30 would increase to 10% of ($160 x 5) $800...or $80.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 02:02 pm
@snood,
That was very funny, but I think you got the subject wrong
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 02:09 pm
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

Do you think that they should be protesting Washington [the white house]?


I think the problems they are concerned about have as much or more to do with the government as they do with Wall Street, so protesting in front of the White House and the Capitol would at least be consistent.

I think to whatever extent they could make their point, they did and should all go home and get back to looking for jobs.

Nothing is going to come from continued demonstrations except violence which is something I fully suspect the movement (including you) wants.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 02:22 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:


I think the problems they are concerned about have as much or more to do with the government as they do with Wall Street


You're plainly incorrect with that thought.

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 02:28 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Maybe, Finn can enlighten us as to why he thinks it also includes the government besides the fact that we elect them into office.



Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 02:34 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Sez you
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 03:42 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Who bailed out the banks and allowed the rich Wall Street bankers to retain their wealth?

Crony-capitalism, and not capitalism, is at the heart of our problems.

One set of cronies operates within corpoations, and the other operates within the government.

Who is more beholden to the American people? Billionaires or the US government?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 04:12 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
The bailout of the banks was the right thing to do; they just did it wrong - with no strings attached. That was not only dumb, but wasted taxpayer money.

They could have taken advantage of making more money from wall street, the banks, and financial institutions if they had implemented the right rules and regulations for the "loans."

That was another Obama disappointment.
snood
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 04:18 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

reasoning logic wrote:

Do you think that they should be protesting Washington [the white house]?


I think the problems they are concerned about have as much or more to do with the government as they do with Wall Street, so protesting in front of the White House and the Capitol would at least be consistent.

I think to whatever extent they could make their point, they did and should all go home and get back to looking for jobs.

Nothing is going to come from continued demonstrations except violence which is something I fully suspect the movement (including you) wants.


When the Tea Party started, the protests were disjointed amalgamations of people who eventually became a major force in the Republican Party. Were you likewise anxious for them to go home and carry on with business as usual when they were forming up all over the country?
Joe Nation
 
  3  
Reply Sat 29 Oct, 2011 06:51 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
The bailout of the banks was the right thing to do; they just did it wrong - with no strings attached. That was not only dumb, but wasted taxpayer money.
They could have taken advantage of making more money from wall street, the banks, and financial institutions if they had implemented the right rules and regulations for the "loans."
That was another Obama disappointment.


ci: I don't know why you keep saying this.

1) The TARP Program was issued by Bush and there were strings attached, lots of them. Over 700 banks benefited and all were warranted for repayment in cash or, like in the case of Citibank, stock. (The Federal Government sold the 1.6 billion shares of Citibank for 60 billion dollars, three times their value.)

2) As of June 2010, all the loans had been repaid with interest or stock sold at a profit. The taxpayers made money on the deal. (To say nothing of the pleasure of not having the entire banking business of the USA collapse.)

Keep being disappointed if you want to but pick something which was actually a disappointment.

Joe(love you, but hey, com'on.)Nation

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 03/10/2025 at 04:53:35