1
   

Implicated = involved?

 
 
Reply Sat 6 Nov, 2010 11:33 pm

hitherto attributed essentially to T cells = (autoimmune diseases) so far caused basically caused by T cells?

Context:

Currently, B cells are being implicated in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases hitherto attributed essentially to T cells, with type 1 autoimmune diabetes being a notable example. All this has raised the possibility of ‘rebalancing’ the immune system by B cell depletion [23]. Such therapies that reduce B cell competence may reduce autoreactivity by resetting a postulated immunostat.
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 03:55 am
To implicate is to allege involvement, not to assert involvement. This passage is saying that B cells may be involved in the process, not that it is known that they definitely are.
High Seas
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 04:27 am
@Setanta,
You are far too kind in responding to posters too lazy to look up dictionaries - and who have been spamming the forum for the longest time.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/implication
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 04:41 am
Oristar is not spamming the site. Oristar is a student of English as a second language. Over the years, his progress has been amazing. He is the fastest and most subtle learner English as a second language i have ever encountered. I suggest to you that he looked up implicate (he is smart enough to know that implicated is the past participle, and to look up the verb to implicate), understood the aspect of involvement, but missed the nuance of alleged involvement, and so came here looking for a definite answer. Lately, he has been reading in genetics and immunology--these are difficult subjects even for the native speaker, so i admire him even more for the perspicacity with which he applies himself to this very difficult task.

Once again, Oristar is not spamming the site.
dlowan
 
  2  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 04:59 am
@High Seas,
You are far too prejudiced and ignorant about the perfectly legitimate use of this site by people for whom English is not a first language.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 08:26 am

Thank you Setanta and Dlowan. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 09:54 am
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

Oristar is not spamming the site. Oristar is a student of English as a second language. Over the years, his progress has been amazing. He is the fastest and most subtle learner English as a second language i have ever encountered.


I agree one hundred per cent with Setanta's remarks.

However, I have a problem with the idea that implication necessarily carries a notion of allegation. I would suggest that the piece quoted...

Quote:
Currently, B cells are being implicated in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases


...could equally be read as "Currently, it is being discovered that B cells are involved in the pathogenesis..."

Here is a dictionary definition that shows what I mean.

Quote:
im·pli·cate (mpl-kt)

1. To involve or connect intimately or incriminatingly: evidence that implicates others in the plot.

2. To have as a consequence or necessary circumstance; imply or entail: His evasiveness implicated complicity.

3. Linguistics To convey, imply, or suggest by implicature.

4. Archaic To interweave or entangle; entwine.

0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 10:12 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:


hitherto attributed essentially to T cells = (autoimmune diseases) so far caused basically caused by T cells?


primarily attributed to T cells until recently .

To the question of proof or hypothesis... I don't know of any proof to date but the hypothesis is gaining ground and B-cell targeted immunotherapies are effective in treating rheumatoid arthritis and are under investigation in many other autoimmune diseases.

Quote:
B-cell-targeted therapy for autoimmune disease emerged from theoretical proposition to practical reality between 1997 and 1998, with the availability of the B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab. Since then, a score of autoantibody-associated disorders have been treated, with most convincing evidence of efficacy seen in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Several classes of B-cell-targeted agent are now under investigation. From the outset, a major goal of B-cell targeting has been the re-establishment of some form of immunological tolerance. In some subjects, the observed improvement of disease for years following therapy fuels hope that this goal might ultimately be achievable. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622478
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 11:04 am
@Setanta,
Indeed!
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 7 Nov, 2010 10:42 pm
@JPB,
Thank you contrex and JPB.

JPB's sparkles with scientific clarity.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Implicated = involved?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 09:45:26