63
   

Should able2know ban people for having untoward opinions?

 
 
Ionus
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 07:46 am
@msolga,
Quote:
The Wikipedia definition accurately defines trolls for me.
I dont see why you think your definition is applied by everyone of your friends here.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:00 am
@NoOne phil,
Quote:
I have always found it difficult to be in a social setting because I have never understood why people respond to their own feelings instead of what was said, as to its truth or falsehood.


There's no need to understand it phil. It's a fact of life. I've got through the defences of a few blokes who claimed to be able to discuss issues disinterestedly. I've had one or two foaming at the mouth. It's all very well discussing matters disinterestedly as long as the issues don't elicit any feelings. People might only go into to social settings to look for opportunities to express more feeling than they can at work or at home.

A better understanding of the "social setting" is what you need in order to be able to feel more at home in one. And it is worth the effort of trying. Blend in.

NoOne phil
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:01 am
@spendius,
I have no desire to blend in. I am not a respecter of persons. I spend my time on the net for a single purpose, because I am single. Otherwise, I have too far to go, and so little time.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  5  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:04 am
@NoOne phil,
NoOne phil wrote:
I think arguing over feelings is an oxymorn on a philosophy forum to begin with.


good thing we're not on a philosophy forum
NoOne phil
 
  -1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:07 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

NoOne phil wrote:
I think arguing over feelings is an oxymorn on a philosophy forum to begin with.


good thing we're not on a philosophy forum

Your a Zen master, I see.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  3  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:07 am
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Why is my thumb green?



Please just don't tempt me like that.....
spendius
 
  0  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:18 am
@msolga,
Quote:
The Wikipedia definition accurately defines trolls for me.


Quote:
In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.


It doesn't for me. Who is to say what "primary intent" means? It can easily be an emotional and subjective definition for those who want it to be.

Who is to say what is off-topic? I consider trawling through mouldy old constitution clauses and Mr Jefferson's letters to quote them in a discussion about teaching evolution in schools today is off topic. But I don't keep moaning about it and going on and on. I read it. If I wasn't prepared to read the posts of others on a thread I wouldn't be on it.
0 Replies
 
NoOne phil
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:20 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

philosophy - the art of collecting stamps
philosopher - one who collects stamps
Philosophising - talking about stamp collections.

Now I am having an identity crisis. Frill.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:22 am
@dlowan,
Quote:
Please just don't tempt me like that.....


Aw dwollie--don't resist so. It ill becomes a lady to resist temptations. Tell me why you think my thumb is green.

Then tell me why it is.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  4  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:39 am
@OCCOM BILL,
I'll leave the proposed "rule" and schema for implementation to Robert, but it sounds prohibitively complicated to me.

I've read your post a number of times trying to find something in there I agree with. I've failed. First, your can remove me from your list of folks whose opinion (thumb) should have greater value than others. My opinion is worth no more or no less than anyone else and I wouldn't want my opinion to be used in determining the value of another member. I also wouldn't want to be judged by the others on your list as to whether or not I was worthy of a good or bad grade.

Your rant about Hawkeye and your inclusion of Thomas in that rant only goes towards demonstrating that you're the one who can't deal with the folks around you. I think spendi has pretty well nailed your involvement as self-serving rather than being a solution to the problem.

The problem with wannabe white knights is that they tend not to fix the problem, but exacerbate it. The best way to make Hawkeye and Billrm ineffective is by NOT interacting with them. You think that throwing gasoline on the fire will put it out. It never has, and it never will. I know you think you're doing the right thing by coming to the aid of your perceived victims and trying to beat some sense into the --pick your favorite invective name-- but it doesn't WORK. It makes things WORSE.

Yes, we all have people around us we'd rather not associate with. No one says we have to be one big happy family. And it's a damn good thing too, because with the 1000s of folks who come through here every year there's no way you're not going to bump up against the poster or two or twelve who rub you the wrong way. Viva la difference.
JPB
 
  2  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:40 am
@spendius,
How long have you been here? Your thumb is green because it's your post.
wandeljw
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:51 am
@JPB,
I know what you mean by white knights possibly exacerbating a problem. However, I think that the voice of a white knight is needed sometimes.
parados
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:54 am
@NoOne phil,
A2k covers all topics. It just happens to have a philosophy section, mainly due to a philosophy site being merged with this one.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:55 am
@wandeljw,
Really? I definitely don't see it.
NoOne phil
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 08:59 am
@parados,
parados wrote:

A2k covers all topics. It just happens to have a philosophy section, mainly due to a philosophy site being merged with this one.

Well, then where do I buy the stamps?
parados
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 09:00 am
@NoOne phil,
The stamp machine, but you need correct change.
NoOne phil
 
  2  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 09:07 am
@parados,
I have been looking for myself since the 60's, now I have to put that off looking for a stamp machine. Life is just so hard.
parados
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 09:13 am
@NoOne phil,
The good news is you don't have to lick the stamps. We have those new fangled peel and stick ones with a picture of Elvis on the front.
NoOne phil
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 09:14 am
@parados,
I seriously need a wife. I could not even stand to look at those stamps.
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 29 Oct, 2010 09:18 am
@JPB,
Quote:
How long have you been here? Your thumb is green because it's your post.


I already know it's my post. I hadn't noticed my thumb was green until today. I never look at that box. What does it mean? I know I can collapse a thread with it as I do with those I have lost interest in. What does the number mean?
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/31/2025 at 10:49:10