10
   

Muslim Garb

 
 
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 09:11 am
@ehBeth,
Juan Williams wrote:
I'm not a bigot. You know the kind of books I've written about the civil rights movement in this country. But when I get on a plane, I've got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they're identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.

Now, I remember also that when the Times Square bomber was at court – I think this is just last week – he said the war with Muslims, America’s war with – is just beginning. First drop of blood. I don't think there’s any way to get away from these facts.


The part of the Williams rant that I found especially troubling was the implication that Muslim Americans are at fault for his irrational fear.

Airline profiling against the Muslim community is a real problem. A national, supposedly impartial, journalist legitimizing this type of bigotry is troubling.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 02:06 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

Quote:
You might want to remember this when you feel a ripple of fear over those foaming mouthed Tea Party members or those fanatical fundamentalist Christians.


Where did you get this? I have no fear of Tea Party members. In fact, I am a big fan of the "foaming mouthed" Tea Party members (the more "foaming mouthed" the better).

This line of discussion is interesting though. If a Fox News commentator was fired for going on NPR to talk about being nervous around people in "tea party garb" being extremists, I wonder what side you would take.


You'll have to take my word for it, but I would hold the same position.

I've said all along that NPR had the right to fire Williams and FOX would have the right to fire their commentator. However, FOX, like NPR, would be displaying a hypocritical double standard.

Of course Williams didn't talk about people in muslim garb being extremists, he said they made him nervous.

If someone feels nervous at a Tea Party rally, it's fine with me if they voice that feeling on television.

I know why someone might feel nervous on a plane with identifiable muslims. I don't know why they would feel nervous at a Tea Party, but they're entitled to their feelings, and expressing them. I would expect that, if they were a news analyst, they would offer an explanation of why they were nervous, and if they realized it was unfair, that they, like Williams, would acknowledge same.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 02:14 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:
His job requires him to be unbiased and when he admits bias to the public it undermines his credibility.


I've yet to read/hear/watch a journalist whose biases aren't clear.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 02:33 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:
The appearences people affect can and do generate fear. Sometimes this effect is intentional (Ku Klux Klan) and sometimes it is not (muslims in clothing that identifies them to Americans as foreigners).


So what? That's a fear which arises from ignorance. Do you assert that it is reasonable for Americans to fear foreigners? How are they supposed to know the foreigners? I refer you to the video of Mohammed Atta in the security area before boarding the plane he would fly into the WTC.

Ignorant people fear eclipses--ignorant people fear many things. It is perfectly reasonable for rational people to deplore their ignorance-bred fears.


Clearly, Williams doesn't fear foreigners, and it was a poor choice of words by me. What he said he feared were not muslims who are foreigners, but muslims whose self-identification is first and foremost muslim. This would, obviously, include American born muslims. That he felt he was able to identify such people by their garb is not particularly crazy although we know such a measure could not be 100% accurate. We all make assumptions based on the way people look. Often, but not always, those assumptions are wrong, and in this case the connection between "fully garbed" muslims and potentially dangerous terrorists is illogical since no one expects a terrorist to get on a plane in "muslim garb," or clothing that is foreign to conventional American styles.

I am having a problem with the notion of deploring someone's fear. It seems entirely appropriate to deplore certain actions taken or suggested because of the fear, but Williams took no actions nor suggested any - quite the opposite.

Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 02:38 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
I deplore fear which people express, and which is based on ignorance. Of course, if it were pointed out to someone that, for some examples, not all Muslims dress as Mr. Williams imagines (to repeat myself, the largest Muslim nation is Indonesia, the they don't wear "Muslim garb"), not everyone who dress in the manner to which Mr. Williams refers are Muslims, and that being Muslim is no more an idicator of violent intent than is being Christian (as in McVey or Rudolph)--and they were to understand that, it were entirely possible that they would, at least gradually, lose the fear born of ignorance. That Mr. Williams took no action is either willfully disengenous or poorly considered on your part--he spoke out, from the position of a well-know news media personality, on a program which attracts tens of millions of viewers. Personally, i'd call that taking action.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 02:40 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Every person who dresses like a skin-head is not a threat. Every person who dresses like a gang-banger is not a threat, but put such individuals in an environment which is perceived as potentially dangerous and those around them will feel fear or anxiety.
Getting on a plane where everyone has gone through screening is an environment that is "potentially dangerous"? Calling getting on a plane "potentially dangerous" because of those around you in and of itself is an irrational fear.


Quote:
There is nothing inherently immoral with seeing someone who looks to you like a muslim sitting across from you on a plane and feeling anxiety.
I guess stupidity isn't immoral but failure to educate oneself may be.



While we know that flying is, statistically, a safer mode of travel than driving, a great many people feel that being on a plane is potentially dangerous, and terrorist attacks are only one of the perceived dangers.

People are killed and mugged in broad daylight all the time, but that doesn't diminish people's fear of being in the dark.

No matter how you frame it, there is nothing immoral about Williams' reaction.

Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 02:45 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:

No matter how you frame it, there is nothing immoral about Williams' reaction.


Ridiculous. Internalized bigotry is still bigotry. What was immoral was his defense of it, as if he was somehow justified in his actions.

He should have said 'I know it's wrong that I feel this way, but I can't help it sometimes.' Instead, both he and you claim that it's RIGHT to feel nervous around muslims, on airplanes or elsewhere. This is not a defensible position and NPR was perfectly justified in firing his ass.

Cycloptichorn
engineer
 
  5  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 03:02 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
He didn't say he was concerned because they were Muslims, he was concerned because "they're identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims." He's saying it is their fault he is scared, that he (and his listeners) are ok in getting mad at these people for making them scared. He doesn't own it, they do. If they would only change how they dress to make him comfortable, there wouldn't be a problem. That statement is what crossed the line, what incites hatred and bigotry.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 03:05 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

He didn't say he was concerned because they were Muslims, he was concerned because "they're identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims." He's saying it is their fault he is scared, that he (and his listeners) are ok in getting mad at these people for making them scared. He doesn't own it, they do. If they would only change how they dress to make him comfortable, there wouldn't be a problem. That statement is what crossed the line, what incites hatred and bigotry.


Thanks, that's a better explanation than the one I gave.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 03:42 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
a great many people feel that being on a plane is potentially dangerous, and terrorist attacks are only one of the perceived dangers.


Don't you wonder why no one has ever said, "It makes me nervous flying with Americans"?

Is that more reasonable considering that Americans are responsible for way way way more terrorist attacks than Muslims could ever hope to pull off?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  2  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 10:49 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

He didn't say he was concerned because they were Muslims, he was concerned because "they're identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims." He's saying it is their fault he is scared, that he (and his listeners) are ok in getting mad at these people for making them scared. He doesn't own it, they do. If they would only change how they dress to make him comfortable, there wouldn't be a problem. That statement is what crossed the line, what incites hatred and bigotry.


No, he didn't say it was their fault that he is scared, and he most certainly didn't say that he was mad at these people or that it was OK for others to be as well.

He wasn't, at all, suggesting that they should change the way they dress.

You have completely distorted what he said.

He simply acknowledged what millions of Americans feel. He didn't justify the feeling or call for any action to be taken as a result.

He was presenting a true dilemma that absolutely exists:

1) Self-identified muslims have been responsible for highly visible acts of actual and threatened terrorist violence, and in far, far greater proportion to any other group in the world, let alone America.

2) Self-identified muslims repreatedly have promised more and greater acts of violence

3) We can not readily identify the self-identified muslims who wish to engage in violent acts and so we fall to a natural instinct for pattern recognition. People who look like intense and sombre muslims generate anxiety in us when we are in airplanes or subway cars with them.

4) This is not fair to the millions of muslims, no matter how they dress, who have absolutely no desire or intention to engage in violents acts.

5) No personal or societal actions should be taken as respects muslims because of this reaction

It doesn't help address the dilemma to deny that millions of people feel such anxiety or condemn them as stupid or immoral for experiencing it.

I travel about 50% of the time and so I am on airplanes quite a bit.

People who I, rightly or wrongly, identify as muslims often travel on the planes I am taking. On the great majority of occassions I feel no concern or anxiety, even though it is quite possible that anyone of them might have explosives in his underwear. The odds are against me being the victim of a terrorist attack on a plane, just as they are against me being the victim of a hydrolics failure.

One day, however, I was on a flight on which six young men who a great majority of people would have identified as "muslims" boarded. They didn't look like Atta, they looked like the other 9/11 terrorists. All of them had grim looks on their faces and none of them sat together. In and of itself meaningless, but pattern recognition started to kick in. A seventh boarded and sat in front of me in First Class. He was wearing a rather shoddy suit, but certainly not "muslim garb." He took the blanket made available to him and pulled it up to his chin. When the flight attendant tried to interest him in a drink or the meal he shooed her off in a surly manner.

Since I am here posting this comment, obviously there wasn't a muslim terrorist attack on that flight.

It's quite possible that all of these young men were grim and surly because they felt like they were being unfairly scrutinized, but I don't feel stupid, wrong or immoral for experiencing my anxiety. I also strongly doubt any of our A2K warriors in the fight against bigotry would have felt any different than I did --- unless they went to sleep as soon as they hit their seat.

Since then I have flown with many another individual who seemed to me to be muslim. I didn't experience fear or anxiety, but it wasn't because I don't believe muslim terrorists are a threat.

When I was a kid there were a series of episodes in our neighborhood in which children were bitten by dogs. As it turned out, there were two German Shepherds doing the biting. From that point forward, whenever a stray dog that even looked like a German Shepherd entered the neighborhood, all the kids ran home and their parents encouraged them to do so.

Obviously not every dog, that was or looked like a German Shepherd, entering our neighborhood was hell bent on mauling kids, but it was a perfectly natural reaction to fear them. People were not stupid or immoral for doing so. They also didn't try to shoot each and every one of them that came down our street or crossed our yard.

If people like Juan Williams feel anxiety when sitting across from muslims on a plane, they way to address this issue can hardly be to label them stupid or immoral.

JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Oct, 2010 11:00 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
1) Self-identified muslims have been responsible for highly visible acts of actual and threatened terrorist violence, and in far, far greater proportion to any other group in the world, let alone America.


As I have pointed out, that is bullshit,. Only in the highly visible portion does your idea make any sense, but there is ample footage from the Vietnam era that blows the towers imagery right out of the water.

The USA has got the World Series in both threatened and actual acts of terrorism/war crimes/mass murder/torture tied up for generations to come. There are no other viable contenders.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Oct, 2010 07:06 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
One day, however, I was on a flight on which six young men who a great majority of people would have identified as "muslims" boarded. They didn't look like Atta, they looked like the other 9/11 terrorists. All of them had grim looks on their faces and none of them sat together. In and of itself meaningless, but pattern recognition started to kick in. A seventh boarded and sat in front of me in First Class. He was wearing a rather shoddy suit, but certainly not "muslim garb." He took the blanket made available to him and pulled it up to his chin. When the flight attendant tried to interest him in a drink or the meal he shooed her off in a surly manner.


This also shows how stupid this argument is.

The 9/11 terrorists weren't dressed in Muslim garb. In fact, as far as I know, no act of terrorism (outside of those committed against Middle Eastern countries) has ever been committed by someone in Muslim Garb.

Here, in an argument about Muslim Garb, you are now using the term "identified as muslims" for people who you admit weren't dressed in Muslim Garb. What exactly does this mean? You point out that they may have been "surly", but I don't believe for a second that you associate surliness with being Muslim. It must be something else.

Here is the point. There is absolutely no reason to believe that someone dressed in Muslim garb is any threat.

Quite the opposite, both from logic and from our experience, people in Muslim garb are the least likely to commit terrorism. Saying that fear against people who appear Muslim is justified when no "muslim garb" is involved is the real issue here.
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 10:58 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
I'd like to interject that while flying is a marvelous invention... I hate the process and quite frequently after standing in long lines, being picked yet again to be searched, because I'm a Canuck..., I'm rather surly and generally don't want to be bothered on a plane either.

Quote:
If people like Juan Williams feel anxiety when sitting across from muslims on a plane, they way to address this issue can hardly be to label them stupid or immoral.


Maybe, but people feel anxiety because of people like him too. He's the bloody media. Or at least a representation of the whole, if you will. He should know better and refuse to believe his own hype. A newsman should know the truth and not be swayed by the hysteria. Regardless of his bias, that what he's paid to do.
What are the facts Jack?
I'd venture a guess and say a person dressed in "muslim garb", is more likely to be on the receiving end of a violent act in america or worldwide, than someone dressed normally?!? And what is normal? What's foreign? We all wear uniforms. Do the Amish send the fear of god up your spine? Or kids from the hood? Or grown idiots draped in sheets? Or nuns? or clowns? or soldiers? or airport security?
His fear is irrational and I believe it's not really a fear at all, it's disguised hatred and it plays on a certain segment of the population's desire to eradicate another group of americans.
He's a journalist. Shouldn't we have some level of expectation that news outlets and or the media aren't part of the problem. That they will dismiss propaganda and give us the truth? A bias is one thing, but at least have the balls to admit to the truth of why he feels that way.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 11:20 am
@Ceili,
Quote:
He's a journalist. Shouldn't we have some level of expectation that news outlets and or the media aren't part of the problem. That they will dismiss propaganda and give us the truth?


Theoretically, that's how one might think it should go, Ceili. but the media, by and large, are simply whores without the shine [not to be confused with those in the sex trade; there's no connection].

They don't have to, but they sell the access they have to the public in order to be able to get that BMW, in order to be invited to the next gala event put on by their puppet masters.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Muslim Garb
  3. » Page 3
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/05/2025 at 10:39:29