Absolute truth?

Yes

thank you common sense still reins

hence an absolute truth is proven

...what what ?

You may be correct but I do have a question for you though!

Do you think that there could possibly be something that you consider to be an absolute truth now that could be proven to be incorrect 10,000 years from now?

...your hypothesizing does n´t have anything to do with it...besides nowadays you could well reduce the number to 5 years...

such as ?

Are we not all hypothesizing or do we know empirical truth when we see it?

there is NO hypothesizing about the sun's importance to life , it is an absolute truth

How about any and all things that you think are empirical {absolutes} Could there be possibly any that may be wrong?

Again I agree! { importance } is the only word that I would step out into a leap of faith for

Yes but our hypothesizing does n´t make any truth less or more truthful then it already is...the classic distinction between knowing and being ! That which is still is even if you don´t know nothing about it !

such as ?

That seems logical! I just think that there could be a possibility of me getting it wrong at times!

Does this possibility exist with either of you?

I mostly get it wrong always...I just try to not be so bluntly wrong as most !

Do you really think that I would know all things that you think are empirical? Really?

Why would you ask such a question?

That is fair enough!

Modern philosophy begins with Descartes doubting everything, beginning with what we see -- Cartesian hyperbolic doubt. Did you ever read Descartes?

Decartes did not doubt everything. He retained a major tacit presupposition of his culture: i.e., that there is a SELF or agent of thought, perception and action, that self who, because HE (the self) thought, ergo necessarily exists (cogito ergo sum). Actually he only saw--in the sense of radical empiricism--thinking, not a self who was thinking. He THOUGHT there was a self/agent/ or subject of thought.
When I look I see thinking, seeing, therefore there is only thinking or seeing, not an agent of thought and perception--despite the fact that my grammar compels me to say to you here that "When 'I" look....
I AM experience, not the recepient of experience.

The very experience itself is a receptacle...it takes shape and pattern !
The way you said it you correct a mistake with another one...

And you add a third?