Would you rape me . . . please . . . pretty please ? ! ? ! ?

Would you rape me . . . please . . . pretty please

Would you rape me . . . please . . . pretty please

No problem, this is easy to get accomplished....have a few drinks or take a toke, and lure the girl into your bed. Voila, you will have been raped. I am shocked that at your age you have not had the pleasure of being raped multiple times already.

Did u switch rape victims

Are you lubed up and safe?

Quote:

Did u switch rape victims

No, according to the rape feminists any woman who is under the influence of alcohol, variously defined as showing any signs of drinking, .08BAC, or having difficulty with walking and control issues, should not by law be allowed to consent to sex. All sex with such a person, no matter how badly she indicates that she wants it, is rape, according to them.

This works for men as well....if he wants to be raped this is easy to get done.

oxymoronic contradiction in terms

Quote:

oxymoronic contradiction in terms

What two words? "want" and "rape"? Given how broad the definition of "rape" is today I think that answer is clearly no, I can see why a person would want to rape or be raped. I have both raped and been raped, and so far as I recall I have tended to enjoy the experience immensely. I recommend the experience, no matter what the law says.

I 'm having a tuff time following your reasoning

I 'm having a tuff time following your reasoning

I am guessing this is because you still think of rape as being a transgression against another's person, where rape has been expanded to include the criminalization of sex that violates the moral judgment that the erotic is not allowed to explore power, is not allowed to employ power, and all sex that does is criminalized on the grounds that consent is invalid. Consent theory is also being used to criminalize all sex with people who chose to imbibe mood altering substances. As Bill has pointed out in the rape thread now that consent theory has been used to define legal sex there are broad bands of normal human sexual behavior that are now open to being criminalized, with the illegal act being labeled as rape.

WHAT "broad bands" ?
I didn't read it

Imho that sounds about right from what I've seen of you here.

WHAT "broad bands" ?
I didn't read it

Bill's example I think was about lies leading to criminal sex. For instance is your decision to be sexual with someone is usually based in part on their marriage status, and a gal who is married tells you that she is single or lets you believe that she is single [or a multimillionaire ?], and you have sex with her, you have been raped. Your consent was never valid, because you had not been aware of the truth, you where mislead by her presumably with the intent to get you into bed.

I then used the logic that it too much alcohol criminalized sex on the grounds that the decision making process has been skewed by an ingested substance, then we could invalidate the consent of anyone who is on a mood altering medication [so if thay r both drunk, then thay shoud both march down to the police station,
both to be prosecuted n incarcerated for rape?], or who is stressed or scattered and not able to make decisions in a considered way as normal. If my wife has a bad day at work and brings it home, if I ask for sex and she complies have I just raped her because she never had the ability to consent because she was not in her "right mind"?

This is the direction that we are going in. I claim that this is a mistake.

When I was a young lawyer, rape coud only be applied to females, by legal definition.

so if thay r both drunk, then thay shoud both march down to the police station,
both to be prosecuted n incarcerated for rape?]

He like's 'em crazy and drunk!!

Quote:

Imho that sounds about right from what I've seen of you here.

So you have confidence and hot air, do you have a case? You know where to find me if you desire to test your theory.

I'm not a woman you dumbshit

And I sure as hell don't want to "find" you.