@HexHammer,
You seem not to be able to address any of my questions without making hysterical charges about "hormone levels." That is the essence of
argumentum ad hominem, and it makes it appear that you are unwilling or unable to defend your propositions.
I have asked you if you assert that all the recognized philosophers from Platon to Wittgenstein used methods flawed by "supersition and stupidity." You have not answered. I have asked you what the goal of the improvement of method will be, so that we may know how progress will be achieved. You have not answered. As i'm not so dense as to need Zetherin's hints, i understand that there is some confused relationship in your screed between this philosophizing method and enlightenment. I have asked you for a definition of enlightenment. You have not answered. I have asked how philosophizing, or an improved method, or enlightenment will end wars and crime. You have not answered.
Rather, you have indulged what seems to be a penchant of yours for flinging insults at people who have the temerity to question you. You did it for nearly two pages with Fil.
Once again, i am not a woman, and it is an absurdity for you to continue the childish insults about hormone therapy. It seems that you have no answers, so i will assume, until you provide some, that this is all gobbledygook, and is essentially just meaningless maundering.