@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:
I don't think that is exactly true because science can be wrong at times. I am surprised to hear Neil say that.
Science like... an apple falls to the earth when not acted upon by another force and the earth is round? Not because some voice in your head told you so or because it is written in the 'holy books' but because careful measurements, analysis and observation are corroborated by many forms of evidence... Whether if you believe it or not... It is the earth's own gravity and not because of some delusional idea that God wills it every time...
Yes these two observations of gravity and the round earth could be wrong but I would not spend much effort trying to prove contrary. Why? Because they have been examined carefully by science and not by blind obedient speculation... And yes, science gave us this understanding while religions hung on stubbornly to their holy books devoid of even simple truths. In hindsight all of these barbaric religions were clearly impotent of truth.
You can travel around the globe hundreds of times and maybe one time it will become flat but don't hold your breath waiting for it happen. History records that because Columbus, though he had many terrible character flaws, doubted the speculators he was led through the giant door to a new world...
Science tries to remain within the realm of what is measurable, what is immeasurable is again merely speculation. People need to recognize when they are relying on speculation and not science and devalue that speculation accordingly... As, speculation, faith, fervent religiosity, fairy tales, myths, dogma, social standards based upon folklore and old wives tales, devotional parables, clerical cogitation, hunches put forth as gospel because they are from the holy book, fervent conjecture etc... And let's not forget God doesn't like it if you tie your camel on a holy day... Just let the camel run off and spend two days finding them later...
Is it too great a thing for God to reveal him/herself to science? We are all eyes and ears...
To err is to equate science with speculation... When speculation usurps science then rampant error built upon error becomes 'truth' and how dare we disagree with God?
What is the foundation of truth? Imagination/revelation and blind obedience or careful and tedious analysis and observation? God supposedly tells a devout servant in their head or a holy person dictates it for them to jump off a cliff so, there they go! The speculation of virgins at the bottom gave them wings? No, they fell like a led balloon, more speculation... How do we know God did not take them to heaven? Well we go down to the bottom and there is their dead body crumbled and broken. Heaven is just another hunch like the one that caused them to jump... And many tales tell of people returning from the grave but where are they now if this is really truth? Would a miracle of the almighty not be everlasting?
Science tosses a stone first... Science puts application before subjugation...
This gives science a creditably that absent from faith...
So a person can pray for a healing when they or loved ones become ill but most people will take their chances with the medical profession... Yet they are quick to subjugate others to their fantasy deity... They are not always right but MUCH more so than relying on solely the miraculous faith healers, hookie pooks and fortune tellers for a magic trick and slight of the mind...
We are eye witnesses of the benefits of science and modern technology but we have only hearsay when it comes to religions. Religion is a fading mirage... It is a matter of perspective and true intelligence is giving weight to the perspective that is more clearly in focus versus the one that is perhaps errant anorexic superstition at best...
Religion and science are not a dichotomy, religion is a parasite that feeds off of science in order to mutate and infest its mental illness upon humanity for another day...