@kennethamy,
kennethamy wrote:But I know they produce a lot of crude oil. Who doesn't? What they do not produce is the stuff that is actually put into the fuel tank. Didn't I make that clear. Or are you intentionally ascribing to me something I never claimed was true, and indeed, disclaimed? Of course they can export crude. But they have to import petrol. The stuff people put into their cars. What is difficult about understanding that (and what has their production of crude compared with that of Saudi Arabia have to do with that?) My point is that Iranians need stuff to put into their cars so their cars can move, and they have to import that stuff. From us. And we can cut that stuff off. And if they put crude oil into their tanks the cars won't move. How can I possibly make it any clearer than that?
Let me remind you of the conversation Ken.
I said in post # 4,297,885 about the oil market keeping Tehran’s pockets full.
I did not mention petrol per se – just profits off of the oil business in general.
You responded with:
“Of course, we can reduced the benefit to Iran with tough sanctions, like reducing (or stopping) the petro being sent to them. Apparently, they are not adept at refining the raw product, so it is imported from those who are. Us. Or, of course, we can eventually bomb them.”
But that’s not correct – they do have refining capabilities and they money they make from oil vastly outweighs that they spend on petrol imports.
So your obsession with their lack of refining capabilities is Just Wrong – they have them – not all refineries are engaged in the production of light fuel. That’s not a prerequisite for being a refinery. Also some of their refineries do produce light fuel, so it’s not as if the tech’s unavailable to them should they want to increase production.
But beside’s all that - it’s irrelevant – whilst they make so many dollars from crude they don’t need to worry about importing petrol to make a net profit. So their “pockets are full” despite their relative lack of light fuel production.