@Specter,
Specter wrote:Well, kind and pretentious sir, I don't know what has given you the brass to lift yourself above any other poster.
I'm better looking.
Specter wrote:I've read your profile statement and it seemed little more than a self-loving, incoherent blather.
Well, I wouldn't call it incoherent.
Specter wrote:That seen, it is no surprise that your post, which I have quoted, bares little more than the weight of an egotistical rant; only in this case, you simply put OTHERS down instead.
I have been advised not to bare my weight around strangers. Complaints from the neighbors and all. You understand.
Specter wrote:Also, it seems that you have not really run into a true PhilForum poster.
Ah, the old "
No True Scotsman" fallacy. I'm surprised you'd need someone like me to teach you about that, but I'm glad to oblige.
Specter wrote:If you had, you would surely balk at wholly discrediting their intelligence and motives.
I haven't discredited anyone. I happen to like the majority of the folks from the PhilForum (about you, on the other hand, I haven't formed an opinion yet). I just don't overestimate their collective brain power, and you're not doing a very good job of changing my estimate.
Specter wrote:I've also seen the topics you have supplied this forum; most of them dealing with movies, pop culture, and personal rhetoric. So, before you seek to destroy someone's credibility, just remember that it is posters like you that quickly disenchant ex-PhilForum members like me.
This is a big forum, and you don't have to participate in any of my movie, pop culture, and personal rhetoric (whatever that is) threads. If you did, though, I'm sure you'd learn a thing or two.
Specter wrote:I loved the PhilForum because people couldn't just spit out nonsensical topics like "Vacuum Cleaners" that Joefromchicago seems perfectly content with posting.
If one wants to talk about vacuum cleaners, then I can think of no better place to do it than on a vacuum cleaner thread. Are you suggesting that I talk about vacuum cleaners on a Wittgenstein thread instead?
That reminds me, I have to update that thread.
Specter wrote:It seems that one must seek out discussions of meaning here, and attempt to sweep away the crusty bits of ridiculous and uninformative information that ends up in these forums. I will, however, not be quieted. I will continue to seek out scraps of brilliance here. I am certain that greater minds are here, and I look forward to carrying on discussions of SOME importance with them.
Who's stopping you?
Specter wrote:Good day, Joefromchicago
It has been so far.