@engineer,
OmSigDAVID wrote:Applying this to chicks makes no sense. It defies logic.
engineer wrote:Swear words are not supposed to be logical.
Words of any kind r symbolic of ideas, for which thay serve as vehicles; in the absence of logic, there is chaos.
That is
unintelligible.
engineer wrote:They are supposed to evoke a visceral, immediate response.
Agreed; that is their purpose.
engineer wrote: It's all about shock value.
SO STIPULATED.
engineer wrote:A woman being called a bitch is not going to logically consider the word
and think that female dogs are friendly and nuturing so she must
have just received a compliment.
Yes; an unrelated meaning was engrafted onto the definition; an alternate definition, to wit:
an unfriendly, ill-tempered, complaining and impatient girl or woman.
By
WHAT etymology have these 2 disparate ideas been united in one word ??
engineer wrote:When I was much younger, my younger brother was very upset at me and wanted to curse,
but knew he couldn't in front of his family, so he yelled out "son of a female dog!"
It was all I could do to not laugh out loud. In cursing, "bitch" carries a lot more weight that "female dog!"
In alleging that someone is the son of a bitch, u claim that he and his mother r dogs,
who used to be deemed very dirty creatures because in efforts to survive,
thay rooted thru garbage, somewhat like pigs.
In his negative emotion, your younger brother failed to notice
that he was identifying his own mom as a dog,
and hence, himself as a son thereof, in addition to u.
David