0
   

Different take on "The War Against Terror".

 
 
dlowan
 
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 09:31 am
A group-dynamic psychologist's take on terrorism, and the dangers of a war against it.

Any comments????




Why the Bush "War on Terror" is Fated to Fail
Wednesday, 26 November 2003, 11:04 am
Column: Guest Opinion
Why the Bush "War on Terror" is Fated to Fail

by John D. Goldhammer

Terrorism is an ideological problem, not a military problem. It is a mental illness caused by a lethal set of virulent group dynamics masquerading as religion. The time is long overdue for us to take our "politically correct," white gloves off so-called religious groups that are in reality bands of dangerous, brainwashed criminals.

What happens when you mix power politics with the Christian strain of religious fundamentalism? You get a toxic stew of arrogance and absolutism; a medieval us-versus-them, God-is-on-our-side mind set that marches right into the jaws of the ideologically-inspired, mass paranoia of Islamic terrorist groups. Thus each group acts and reacts based on the same deadly dynamics, each the other's evil enemy.

The political rhetoric surrounding the rationale for the war in Iraq continues to sound more like a religious crusade, the political consequences of cult-like group dynamics that, to survive, depend upon creating outside enemies. With an unsettling irony, we become the aggressor, the global bully, terrorizing tens of thousands of innocent civilians (between 6,806 and 7,797 killed in Iraq alone, according to a British-American research group in London) in a desperate attempt to destroy a member of George W's designated "axis of evil." Are we now going to be political police, imposing our concept of democracy around the globe?

War certainly qualifies as a "weapon of mass destruction," and our pre-emptive/preventative policy of violent aggression against a sovereign nation only serves to dump more fuel on the spreading ideological plague of vicious, Islamic fundamentalism now directed against non-Muslims and most of the civilized world. War only solidifies and further ignites the passions of those individuals caught in this lethal swamp of group-inspired hatred directed towards the U.S. Bush's divisive, gun-slinger, "You're either with us or against us," absolutism, is eerily similar to Islamic fanatics, who are intent upon terrorizing and destroying the "infidels"-that's you and me-and anyone else who is non-Muslim. They believe, in the words of one prominent Iranian ayatollah, that "Moslems have no alternative . . . to an armed holy war against profane governments. . . . . It will . . . be the duty of every able-bodied adult male to volunteer for this war of conquest, the final aim of which is to put Koranic law in power from one end of the earth to the other." To fundamentalist Islam the US is the "great Satan," while George W. Bush, indoctrinated by his own destructive, self righteous, group-think, world view, said, "We are in a conflict between good and evil, and America will call evil by its name." And, according to the "Bush Doctrine," the United States is "called to bring God's gift of liberty to every human being in the world" - good news for Christians, bad news for Moslems and other beliefs.

How have we as a nation been led down this slippery slope into the terrible maw of our own brand of barbaric, black and white dogmatism that is perverting a nation once dedicated to peace and freedom into a war-mongering, "many-headed beast" intent on ever-increasing world dominance. Hence the transparent spectacle of archaic empire-building disguised as "freedom and democracy."

The Bush regime's behavior epitomizes many dangerous characteristics of a full-blown cult: a dysfunctional group ideology obliterates the individual human conscience, whether Christian or Muslim; ideology-fanaticism and mass hysteria-then become mechanisms for rationalizing the greatest evil of all-war. Once infected, this dehumanizing, mental virus turns normally "good" people into conscienceless killing machines. This is NOT religion! This is insanity!

A political party, a group, sect or religion gone bad requires dedicated, willing members who surrender independent critical thinking and suppress their innate sense of right and wrong for an idealistic sounding mission. Conscience, integrity and a sense of self-responsibility are the first casualties in any destructive ideology. Because a group-directed life is much less of a strain than individual critical thinking and self-responsibility, there is an ever-present, overwhelming temptation to allow the group mind to displace the individual conscience. The process goes something like this:

Education: People, often beginning with children, are taught to hate those who are different and they are taught to interpret scriptures, like the Bible or the Koran, literally instead of symbolically: holy war, Jihad, is then externalized, waged on perceived outside enemies in contrast to an inner holy war with one's lesser nature.

Creating enemies: The group, whether political or religious, must create enemies to survive: other nation states, other religions, other races. Unspeakable evil is rationalized for the "greater good," for the sake of the group's mission and agenda. It's "unfortunate" if thousands of innocent civilians are murdered in the process.

Labeling: Destructive ideologies categorize others by group characteristics such as color, religion, ethnicity, nationality or economic status instead of seeing the individual human being.

Elitism: Leaders' ideas and agenda are sacred, inspired or beyond reproach: This produces a presumed superiority over others with different views, encouraging elitism, separation, hatred, and prejudice.

Black and white thinking: Destructive organizations promote a fundamental separation of pure and impure, good and evil: purity equates to being in the group; impurity and evil equate to those outside the group, who must be saved, defeated or destroyed. God is always on their side.

Exclusiveness: Belief that their belief system-whether political, economic, or religious-is the solution for the world's problems. They have the truth and nonbelievers do not.

Censorship: Leadership attempts to control information and communication into and out of the group as well as individuals' inner thought processes. Doubts, criticisms and different ideas are taken as attacks, disloyalty, or lack of faith.

What then do we do about terrorism and terrorists? First we must refuse to lower ourselves to their level-to become the "evil" that we most despise in others. And we must find creative alternatives to war, working with our allies and the world community to solve legitimate international crises. Of course we, along with all non-violent, freedom-loving peoples, must work together to find and arrest each and every individual who commits a terrorist act or any other crime against humanity. There can be no sanctuary on the planet for such criminals. Terrorism has no geographical boundaries. Its territory is the human mind.

Teaching children to hate those who have different beliefs is a crime against our common humanity. Those who teach hatred, racism, and prejudice in schools ought to be treated as criminals and sociopaths. Any institution, any ideology, organization or school, like the Islamic Madrassa that promotes such teachings must no longer be tolerated by the world community and must be outlawed.

It may well be that we are condemned to repeat past horrors-until we come to grips with the crucial necessity to educate ourselves and most urgently, children everywhere, about the often fatal effects of destructive groups and destructive ideologies. We ought to be defenders of freedom and democracy, a benevolent force in the world through our example, not demagogues wearing the dark shrouds of arrogance, power, religious absolutism and empire-building.

Perhaps the real weapon of mass destruction we need to be concerned about is the virulent, fundamentalist group mind that has infected both the Christian and Moslem religions.

**********

- John D. Goldhammer, Ph.D., is a Seattle Washington (USA) writer, psychologist, and author of "U nder the Influence: The Destructive Effects of Group Dynamics " (Prometheus Books). His newest book has just been released: Radical Dreaming (Kensington/Citadel Press). He has created and taught these university classes: Psychology of Groups and The Psychology of Hate. [email protected] .

This article was also Published on Saturday, November 22, 2003 by CommonDreams.org
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 3,106 • Replies: 69
No top replies

 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 10:18 am
interesting ideas, last night i was reading an essay about the various constructs of groups regarding the idea of power vs strength. some, like native americans, accurately perceived the superior power of the "white man" but held on to ideas of innate strength of their cultural heritage. The end result was the only means of defeating the native americans was by defeating their culture which we did by the reservation system/abolishing their language/making them dependent for all their needs, in effect destroying the man/enemy not by warfare but by culturcide.
added thought: power has on occassion been offended by what they have seen as their "power" assaulted by "strength" such as the Soviet Union by Afghanistan- Great Britain by Argentina and the United States by Grenada.
another added thought: Power such as the US is currently demonstrating is related to being able to force others to do as we wish but can only be utile in a specific and concrete application (war on Iraq) but strength as demonstrated by the idea of establishing new borders for freedom may be the only way to contain "terrorism." Power is always finite, Strength never is.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 10:34 am
I certainly agree with Dr. Goldhammer. But how would we put this into practice?

It seems to me that we would need to separate ourselves from the Middle East, the focal point of the problem. This would mean developing alternative fuels, so that we could tell the people from the petroleum rich nations to take their oil and shove it. I doubt very much that the powers-that-be would be very pleased at that thought, as many of the rich and powerful here have been hand in glove with the very powers that are hell bent on destroying the Western way of life.

In addition, we would have to become more proactive and vigilant in capturing terrorists, who would destroy the United States. But how do we determine the line between maintaining national security in a reasonable fashion, and terrorism paranoia?
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 11:30 am
This guy is brilliant and I agree with 99% of what he says. There is one paragraph which caught my eye as being somewhat contradictory and perhaps should have been two paragraphs with a bit more support for for the first half.

Dr. Goldhammer wrote:
What then do we do about terrorism and terrorists? First we must refuse to lower ourselves to their level-to become the "evil" that we most despise in others. And we must find creative alternatives to war, working with our allies and the world community to solve legitimate international crises.


This is the first part of the paragraph which I don't disagree with but then comes the contradictory part:

Dr. Goldhammer wrote:
Of course we, along with all non-violent, freedom-loving peoples, must work together to find and arrest each and every individual who commits a terrorist act or any other crime against humanity. There can be no sanctuary on the planet for such criminals. Terrorism has no geographical boundaries. Its territory is the human mind.


Now I absolutely agree with this but does it go with the first two sentences?

My criticism is only "nit picking" of course. I really admire the way the author has "nailed" the essential premise which is " Extremist ideology is the real enemy" without the usual biased attempt to blame the US for creating all the causes for the Islamist extremism.

It is also a very cleverly written indictment against christian fundamentalist extremism and a clever attempt to indict Bush for using religious fervor to perpetuate and legitimize an immoral war.

While the Good Dr. is indeed a brilliant intellectual he makes only a feeble attempt to tell us how to combat terrorism by identifying corrections that we must make as in these paragraphs:

Dr Goldhammer wrote:
Teaching children to hate those who have different beliefs is a crime against our common humanity. Those who teach hatred, racism, and prejudice in schools ought to be treated as criminals and sociopaths. Any institution, any ideology, organization or school, like the Islamic Madrassa that promotes such teachings must no longer be tolerated by the world community and must be outlawed.

It may well be that we are condemned to repeat past horrors-until we come to grips with the crucial necessity to educate ourselves and most urgently, children everywhere, about the often fatal effects of destructive groups and destructive ideologies. We ought to be defenders of freedom and democracy, a benevolent force in the world through our example, not demagogues wearing the dark shrouds of arrogance, power, religious absolutism and empire-building.

Perhaps the real weapon of mass destruction we need to be concerned about is the virulent, fundamentalist group mind that has infected both the Christian and Moslem religions.


**********

All in all Bunny, a very high level "take" on terrorism and a very worthwhile thread.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 12:45 pm
A cult is a cult no matter what it names itself
A cult is a cult no matter what it names itself. All religions are forms of cults that just got out of hand on purpose or by accident. That's why I'm an atheist. To understand the basis of Doctor Goldhammer's opinion, one must study the history of cults. This I have done over several decades as my family was adversely affected by one.

Just because a cult wraps itself in a religious package to sell it to the public does not mean its not a cult. All cults are bad, always have been and always will be.

BBB
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 12:54 pm
Cults can be found anywhere, even business
I found an interesting account of businesses that reached near-cult status. It shows that cults can be found in all aspects of human activity. I would add Amway to the author's list of companies.

http://www.forbes.com/asap/2001/0402/Cult_xtraCrosby.html

Here's one about ancient Roman cults; fascinating.

http://216.239.39.104/search?q=cache:gTzqCki4ysMJ:www.bates.edu/~mimber/Rciv/cults.htm+cults+in+history&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

I wonder if animals have cults, too?

BBB
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 01:22 pm
BBB

How about fixing that long link-----it stretched the screen.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 01:24 pm
Re: A cult is a cult no matter what it names itself
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
A cult is a cult no matter what it names itself. All religions are forms of cults that just got out of hand on purpose or by accident. BBB


AMEN!


And while I am not an atheist -- it is my opinion that a "war" of sorts "on religion" -- the very notion of religion -- should be undertaken.

I'm not advocating killing people -- but those of us who see religion for the menace to humanity it actually is -- have got to raise our voices.

MY GUESS: Our numbers are huge -- but hidden because so many of us think our numbers are few and because there is fear of retribution in the workplace at the hands of the "many."
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 01:30 pm
perception
perception, sorry, I've tried to condense links before and it didn't work. It will disappear once page 2 starts.

BBB
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 01:35 pm
Frank
Frank wrote: "And while I am not an atheist -- it is my opinion that a "war" of sorts "on religion" -- the very notion of religion -- should be undertaken."

I think your "war" words are unfortunate because that just inflames the religious. Another way must be found to expose religion-cult abuses and tactics. One of the most important tasks is to promote separation of religion and government in all countries as a first step. Even that will be hard to pursue non-violently.

BBB
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 01:50 pm
BBB

Then how about deleting that link-----a serious look at cults takes this thread on a needless diversionary path----IMHO
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 01:53 pm
perception wrote:
BBB

Then how about deleting that link-----a serious look at cults takes this thread on a needless diversionary path----IMHO

Hmmm...who was it that said denial is the strongest sign of a problem? Wink
Anyway, the similarity between cult control techniques and the modus operandi of the far right are striking!
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 02:20 pm
Though not trained as a psychologist, I do like what he has to say. Is the process he describes - education, creating enemies, labeling, etc - a psych staple for explaining groups like sects?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 04:59 pm
And stuff like Nazism etc...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 05:03 pm
Actually, it kind of encapsulates the reason I loathe much of the political discourse here - and other places - where people feel the need to accompany any mention of a political enemy with one, or a series, of empty pejorative slogans - you know what I mean?
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 05:08 pm
Absolutely!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 05:13 pm
hobitbob wrote:
perception wrote:
BBB

Then how about deleting that link-----a serious look at cults takes this thread on a needless diversionary path----IMHO

Hmmm...who was it that said denial is the strongest sign of a problem? Wink
Anyway, the similarity between cult control techniques and the modus operandi of the far right are striking!


And, sadly, of the far left.

I think the spectrum forms a circle at its extreme ends - and they meet!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 05:15 pm
Frank - I do tend to agree that your expression:"war" on religion is an example of that very phenomenon - becoming the thing we hate!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 05:20 pm
dlowan wrote:
I think the spectrum forms a circle at its extreme ends - and they meet!


So true, and then the ideological radical simply slides back and forth to whichever side is in power to spread its venom.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Nov, 2003 05:21 pm
dlowan wrote:
I think the spectrum forms a circle at its extreme ends - and they meet!


Yes, couldn't aagree more.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Different take on "The War Against Terror".
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 12:51:17