Girl attacked over history project!

And all those white people who broke the law by helping slaves escape, surely they were evil-doers. They broke the law.

To be fair, they owned it before we did.

They, (Mexicans) are a race of people made up of White Spaniards and (Asian) Indians.

This land was never "owned" by Mexicans. And regardless of money paid -

the White Europeans conquered this land and that is how it became a White possession.

The Mexicans were weak and the Whites were strong;

The Indians were weak and the Whites strong.

A conquest was in order. I wonder had the Chinese or the black Africans conquered this land if the "noble" Indians or the Mexicans would have the opportunities and protections afforded them as they are/have been by the Whites? Nah. I don't wonder. I know how it would be. And so do you, you bleeding heart liberal.

Two problems:

1. Mexican is not a race it's a nationality. Sorry, son. You are contradicting yourself. "Nationality" is derived from the word nation which finds its origin in a Latin word meaning "race". I was wrong in that I referred to Mexicans as a race when I was actually referring to Mestizos as a race, (even though Mestizos are not a race, but a mixture of races

2. The natives of the "americas" were not Asian, if they were Asian they would be from Asia. Someone needs to learn their geography. Yes ma'am, you are right - you need to know your geography in respect to the fact that many of differing races didrelocate to other continents, (as did Asians to North America, and Whites to North America)



Okay so now Mexico and all of central America belongs to Europe? What an idiotic statement

You think because you have the same skin color of the conquistadors that you have an entitlement to that land? No ma'am. I know that I have entitlement to this land because people of my racial heritage died for my entitlements, just as I am willing to do for my descendants.

Mexico was conquered by the Spaniards, the people (WHITE Spanish colonists) revolted against the crown and gained their independence from Spain and that is how they have the land now. So explain to me again how this is "Your" land? Easy. This is MY ******* LAND BECAUSE MY KINDRED/FOREFATHERS FOUGHT AND DIED FOR IT, and it was EARNED via their sacrifices. Just as China was won by conquest for the Chinese and Japan for the Japanese.
Do not play with me, boy. My race has a right to exist and to have a land of our own. Your Jewish rhetoric cannot change that.

I suppose you are a white supremacist? And I suppose you are a Jewish supremacist who hates White people?


So basically you're saying it was justified because Europeans treated them better than you think the Chinese or Nubians, Egyptians (etc..) would have treated them had been they been the ones to conquer the americas? Do Not play the politically correct liberal with me. My statement went without challenge, without contest, without evidence against my post.


Your prejudiced rants aren't convincing anyone. Your anti-White bullshit is lesser than any of my rants. Relax. Logically, you cannot defeat anything I post.

Sorry, son. You are contradicting yourself. "Nationality" is derived from the word nation which finds its origin in a Latin word meaning "race".

Yes ma'am, you are right - you need to know your geography in respect to the fact that many of differing races didrelocate to other continents, (as did Asians to North America, and Whites to North America)

What an idiotic statement

No ma'am. I know that I have entitlement to this land because people of my racial heritage died for my entitlements, just as I am willing to do for my descendants.

Easy. This is MY ******* LAND BECAUSE MY KINDRED/FOREFATHERS FOUGHT AND DIED FOR IT, and it was EARNED via their sacrifices.

Just as China was won by conquest for the Chinese and Japan for the Japanese.

Do not play with me, boy.

My race has a right to exist and to have a land of our own. Your Jewish rhetoric cannot change that.

And I suppose you are a Jewish supremacist who hates White people?

FF: So basically you're saying it was justified because Europeans treated them better than you think the Chinese or Nubians, Egyptians (etc..) would have treated them had been they been the ones to conquer the americas?

Do Not play the politically correct liberal with me. My statement went without challenge, without contest, without evidence against my post.

Your anti-White bullshit is lesser than any of my rants.

Relax. Logically, you cannot defeat anything I post.

What is your race? Don't say, "human race". Answer what race your genes sprang from.

No it comes from the Latin word natio meaning "native".

c.1300, from O.Fr. nacion, from L. nationem (nom. natio) "nation, stock, race," lit. "that which has been born," from natus, pp. of nasci "be born" (see native). Political sense has gradually taken over from racial meaning "large group of people with common ancestry." Older sense preserved in application to N.Amer. Indian peoples (1650). Nationality "the fact of belonging to a particular nation" is from 1828. Nation-building first attested 1907 (implied in nation-builder). National is from 1597; national anthem first recorded 1819, in Shelley. Nationalize "bring under state control" is from 1869.












No it's an idiotic statement to say that Mexico belongs to you because you are white and the conquistadors were white. I never said Mexico belongs to me or my people. Where did you get that from?





The Americas were conquered in the name of SPAIN not in the name of white people. Perhaps you can show me which of conquistadors were your ancestors, that would be great! As you said the CONQUERORS were from Spain and were White. Racially, they are my kindred, just as your king Obama recognizes his black kindred from jig land, I recognize mine from Spain - based on skin color.





Show this to me. Which of these conquistadors were your ancestors? SHOW THIS TO ME: Which were NOT? You liberals always want to attack with non consequential bs because you have no arguments. Cowards always attack with insults. Sorry, lib, with me, you have to produce an argument in support of your ideologies. Be strong, gay liberal boy. Fight with intelligence and reason.




Those are both nations. If Chinese conquests belong to the Chinese then Spanish conquests belong to the Spanish. What is wrong with you? White Europeans conquered this land known as the U.S.A., not Spaniards. Therefore this land belongs to White Europeans.





Ahahaha!!!

But it's so much fun.



Where Have I said it didn't have a right to exist[the White race]? And what about my "rhetoric" is Jewish? All of it is anti-White and derogatory to the White race.


All of our genes came out of Africa.Tell that to the geese. Nice to meet you, Mr. Gay P.C. Goy

No it comes from the Latin word natio meaning "native".

Quote:

c.1300, from O.Fr. nacion, from L. nationem (nom. natio) "nation, stock, race," lit. "that which has been born," from natus, pp. of nasci "be born" (see native). Political sense has gradually taken over from racial meaning "large group of people with common ancestry." Older sense preserved in application to N.Amer. Indian peoples (1650). Nationality "the fact of belonging to a particular nation" is from 1828. Nation-building first attested 1907 (implied in nation-builder). National is from 1597; national anthem first recorded 1819, in Shelley. Nationalize "bring under state control" is from 1869.

Like I said, natio meaning native. the fact that the word nation at one time may have also been used to describe race lends no credence to your argument. Furthermore Nationality is much more specific than nation and has a much more modern origin.

Quote:

I never said Mexico belongs to me or my people. Where did you get that from?

You said that the conquered lands of the Spaniards belonged to you because you are white, yes or no?

Mexico was conquered by the Spaniards, yes or no?



The Americas were conquered in the name of SPAIN not in the name of white people. Perhaps you can show me which of conquistadors were your ancestors, that would be great!

Quote:

As you said the CONQUERORS were from Spain and were White. Racially, they are my kindred,

And culturally they are not, nationally they are not, genealogically they are not.

So why does the fact that you share a physical characteristic with them mean that what they took belongs to you?

Quote:

just as your king Obama recognizes his black kindred from jig land, I recognize mine from Spain - based on skin color.

And based on skin color, can a Japanese person lay claim to that which was conquered by the ancient Chinese? yes or no?

Quote:

SHOW THIS TO ME: Which were NOT?

You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you.

Quote:

You liberals always want to attack with non consequential bs because you have no arguments.

So you lay claim to a land based on your ancestry, and when i question your ancestry it is "non-consequential"?

I can smell your hypocrisy from a mile away.

Quote:

Cowards always attack with insults. Sorry, lib, with me, you have to produce an argument in support of your ideologies.

and which insult is that?

Quote:

Be strong, gay liberal boy. Fight with intelligence and reason.

And in the very next sentence you attempt to insult me.

Classy move.

Those are both nations. If Chinese conquests belong to the Chinese then Spanish conquests belong to the Spanish.

Quote:

What is wrong with you? White Europeans conquered this land known as the U.S.A., not Spaniards.

So then it belongs to those European nations and their immediate ancestors.

Quote:

Therefore this land belongs to White Europeans.

So if a Frenchman decides to build a mansion in your backyard, you'd let him right? After all it is his land, right?

Quote:

All of it is anti-White and derogatory to the White race.

Where have I said a single derogatory thing about the "white race"?

I'll wait...

Quote:

FF: All of our genes came out of Africa.

Tell that to the geese.

Geese are one of us? They are human?

Quote:

Nice to meet you, Mr. Gay P.C. Goy

Jimmy Dean is your friend - sausage smokin'.

Ad hom.

Go ahead and make your childish insults, they only serve to show everybody how much of a fool you truly are.

Whip;68346 wrote:

No it comes from the Latin word natio meaning "native".

Ever heard of etymology? Basically, it is the origin of words. Pull your panties up tight, my little Jewish friend - this wedgie jus might hurt:
Nation comes from the following: c.1300, from O.Fr. nacion, from L. nationem (nom. natio) "nation, stock, race," lit. "that which has been born," from natus, pp. of nasci "be born" (see native). Political sense has gradually taken over from racial meaning "large group of people with common ancestry." Older sense preserved in application to N.Amer. Indian peoples (1650). Nationality "the fact of belonging to a particular nation" is from 1828. Nation-building first attested 1907 (implied in nation-builder). National is from 1597; national anthem first recorded 1819, in Shelley. Nationalize "bring under state control" is from 1869.



Like I said, natio meaning native. the fact that the word nation at one time may have also been used to describe race lends no credence to your argument. Furthermore Nationality is much more specific than nation and has a much more modern origin. "Modern origin"?And "modern origin" supersedes reality?





You said that the conquered lands of the Spaniards belonged to you because you are white, yes or no?

Mexico was conquered by the Spaniards, yes or no? No. The Spaniards plundered and pillaged Asianindians and created the Mexicans in what is now known as Mexico.



The Americas were conquered in the name of SPAIN not in the name of white people. Spain was White during the conquests. Perhaps you can show me which of conquistadors were your ancestors, that would be great! Perhaps you could show me which of your ancestral Jews was not a Khazar, and you have a "chosen right" to decide the outcome of my people.



And culturally they are not, nationally they are not, genealogically they are not.

So why does the fact that you share a physical characteristic with them mean that what they took belongs to you?




And based on skin color, can a Japanese person lay claim to that which was conquered by the ancient Chinese? yes or no?







You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you.



So you lay claim to a land based on your ancestry, and when i question your ancestry it is "non-consequential"?

I can smell your hypocrisy from a mile away.



and which insult is that?



And in the very next sentence you attempt to insult me.

Classy move.

Those are both nations. If Chinese conquests belong to the Chinese then Spanish conquests belong to the Spanish.



So then it belongs to those European nations and their immediate ancestors.



So if a Frenchman decides to build a mansion in your backyard, you'd let him right? After all it is his land, right?




Where have I said a single derogatory thing about the "white race"?

I'll wait...




Geese are one of us? They are human?



Ad hom.

Go ahead and make your childish insults, they only serve to show everybody how much of a fool you truly are.

Just like a Jew, you have a ton of insults here and I, (like a White man), haven't a time to reply. But, hang in there, my little White hating friend, and I will do my best against your hatefilled lies against White people.

"Modern origin"?And "modern origin" supersedes reality?

No. The Spaniards plundered and pillaged Asianindians and created the Mexicans in what is now known as Mexico.

Spain was White during the conquests.

Perhaps you could show me which of your ancestral Jews was not a Khazar, and you have a "chosen right" to decide the outcome of my people.

No, I'm pointing out the simple fact that NATIONALITY and NATION are two completely different words.

Wrong. Nationality is derived from Nation. Both connect and translate back to RACE.

Give me a single good reason why the skin color of the conquerors should give you more of an entitlement to a land than the people who have been living there for the past several hundred years. I will say it like a Jew says it: "G-d gave this land to my people. My RACE has been CHOSEN by G-d and so I am entitled to any land I occupy" Isn't this the argument of your people? Isn't this what you Jews preach? Am I less than a Jew? No. I am more than the Jew because I have shared my food with the Jew, while they have denied my children/my people sustenance.

which of conquistadors were your ancestors? All of them, for they were my kindred. NOW, answer my question, which of the Khazars were your ancestors and why is your people so hateful toward Whites?

Wrong. Nationality is derived from Nation. Both connect and translate back to RACE.

I will say it like a Jew says it: "G-d gave this land to my people. My RACE has been CHOSEN by G-d and so I am entitled to any land I occupy" Isn't this the argument of your people? Isn't this what you Jews preach? Am I less than a Jew? No. I am more than the Jew because I have shared my food with the Jew, while they have denied my children/my people sustenance.

All of them, for they were my kindred.

NOW, answer my question, which of the Khazars were your ancestors and why is your people so hateful toward Whites?

Just wondering....whats the Jew going to do to control the uncontrollable negro once YT is gone? I suspect the negro is going to punch your clocks too. When you open the gates of hell - you suffer the consequences. Would say, "Will see you Jews in hell", but that is reserved for anti-Christs - Jews.

Just wondering....whats the Jew going to do to control the uncontrollable negro once YT is gone? I suspect the negro is going to punch your clocks too. When you open the gates of hell - you suffer the consequences. Would say, "Will see you Jews in hell", but that is reserved for anti-Christs - Jews.

Just because the Greeks and Romans used a word the meant both race and country and the English word is based on that does not mean it has the same meaning as used today as when the Greeks and Romans used it. Until a few short decades ago the word nation did mean race specifically in the English language.


I am an atheist. Where have I said I was a Jew? Furthermore Judaism is a religion not an ethnicity. Most Jews are white. Judaism is a religion; being a Jew is racial. Ask any Jew. The reason so many Jews appear to be White is because to be a Jew, all one has to have as a parent is a Jewish mother to be a Jew. In other words, any non Jew mating with a Jewes does not breed any of the Jew out of the children. This is Jewish belief.FYI: Many Jews are atheist.


And where have I claimed the khazars are my ancestors? The Khazars are the ascendants of the modern Jew. They took the Jewish religion and race and claimed it as their own, even though they have no connection to any other Jews.

you try and you fail. If you are not a Jew, you argue like one.



what "race" do you think I belong to? You have guessed and you have failed. I suspect the gay, pot smoking, live in his mommas basement race, (if one exists).

Until a few short decades ago the word nation did mean race specifically in the English language.

Judaism is a religion; being a Jew is racial.

Ask any Jew. The reason so many Jews appear to be White is because to be a Jew, all one has to have as a parent is a Jewish mother to be a Jew.

In other words, any non Jew mating with a Jewes does not breed any of the Jew out of the children. This is Jewish belief.FYI: Many Jews are atheist

The Khazars are the ascendants of the modern Jew. They took the Jewish religion and race and claimed it as their own, even though they have no connection to any other Jews.

you try and you fail. If you are not a Jew, you argue like one.

I suspect the gay, pot smoking, live in his mommas basement race, (if one exists).