Something is a miss.

Is shooting civilians US policy?

Yeah, so?

violence against civilians is not that uncommon.

so? Then unless you can prove that the man on the bicycle was shot for a political goal then you cannot consider it terrorism, making those numbers you gave very inaccurate.

That doesn't answer the question, is it a specific policy of the US?

Do you think they post every violent incident in the Muslim world? Obviously they have verified that it was done by certain people for certain reasons.

Is it Iranian policy? is it Iraqi policy? is it Chinese policy?

Whether or not it is specifically stated in policy has no affect.

Okay then, prove it! I want a source. I have a hard time believing that a man was shot on a bicycle as an act of terrorism. I want to see sources on this!

Yes, it does. It is the difference between systematic and random violence against civilians.

The source would be the website.

Obviously the suspected shooter was a known terrorist.

Yes, it does. It is the difference between systematic and random violence against civilians.

systematic violence without policy supporting such is practiced the world over! Do i need to give you a history lesson?

Can you prove this or are you making presumptions? Even if it were true that doesn't necessarily make it a "terrorist act"!

So you'd propose violence commited by the US Military against civilians is systematic?

What's to stop them from putting up every murder commited by Muslims, then?

Wouldn't be the first time, consider how police treated blacks during the 60's.

You tell me.

Southern police = US military?

Nothing, so if they put it up, I'm sure it's legit.