@Numpty,
Numpty;61623 wrote:Into conspiracy theories now are we?
When you actually go and read some text books, watch some footage and understand how science works, and how many thousands of independant scientists all come to the same conclusion based upon experiments which have been carried out, re-carried out and then done again. You will begin to appreciate the amount of time and work that has gone into studying, geology, palaeontology, genetics, biology. This isn't just one group of people studying one part of the theory. The scientists show no mercy when it comes to testing the science, they are relentless in their pursuit of facts, all the time other sientists working indepenantly verifying the data produced.
You cling to obscure figurines as some sort of proof that they bring down evolution. Yet time and time again I have asked you to bring the science to the table which says your idea is true, but you have failed to procuce a single piece of geological evidence. All you are intent in doing is trying (and failing) to some how disprove a science which has been scutinised for 150 years, yet still fails to be proved wrong.
So again I ask you, please produce your testable science which proves a young earth and that evolution does not occur.
It is not just obscure figurines that have passed testable scientific dating that confirms them, it is countless other art forms from ancient times that depicts dinosaurs. These pictures refute Evolution, because it clearly show us that dinosaurs did not die off 75 million years ago as those who believe in Evolution state they did. Bring science to the table? The only way you could bring todays bias science to the table is at gun point. Science is not intrested in disproving their Theory, nor do they want to see any of this evidence. Outside of one man that was sent to look at the figuriens of ElToro mountain, I do not recall any Evolutionest who took it apon themselves to consider this find. It was others outside of Evolution who took the time to do this. And when the figurines dates were confirmed by thermoluminescent dating, they were still dismissed by Evolutionest. The facts are out there, yet if these facts are just ignored, you can spend a life time asking me to produce testable science, only to ignore it when it is presented. And this is what has been happening. Much of the science you speak of is guess work and assumptions. And when you have facts that refute those assumptions, science has learn to ignore those facts. And if this is not true, who outside of the one Evolutionest named Dipeso was sent down to Mexio to consider the 33,000 figurines of ElToro mountain? Where is their in depth study of these figurines? Which of the believers in Evolution took the time to do thermoluminescent testing on them? I will tell you. (NOT ONE OF THEM).
It is not I who has failed here, it is todays science that is so bias, that they just dismiss evidence without doing the research or the testing. And when others confirm the find and secure the results, todays science calls that unscientific. Science has only proven that Evolution can only be believed if you are willing consider their Theory through a very narrow filter. And that filter ignores or excludes all other evidence that would call into question the Theory of Evolution.
As I have stated, if I am incorrect, can you show us where science has done an in depth study of the ElToro mountain figurines? Can you tell us what labs the believers in Evolution sent the figurines to for thermoluminescent testing? Can you show us what Evolutionest outside of Dipeso actually looked at the figurines?