Church of England to Apologise to Darwin

Well... I did notice that the caveman only had 3 toes and 4 fingers but I figured that we probably evolved the rest later.:cavt-126-asard:

Hopefully you do not believe humans went around riding on the backs on dinosaurs.

Answer this simple question: What part, exactly about "the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators" is refuted by thirty-three thousand clay figurines? What part of "mitochondrial DNA" do they refute?

And if that's a stegosaur, then why are there no fossils or remains of them anywhere in Cambodia? I mean... anywhere in Cambodia.

And why does the carving have tusks? Stegs have tusks?

As sabz and myself have pointed out numerous times the figurines aren't accurate. You can only tout your clay toys so far, until we get some fossil evidence then you cannot logically conclude that man and dinosaurs lived at the same time.



This is not an accurate depiction of natural history:

There are drawings and art work all over the world of men and dinosaurs together, and when human bones are found in strata that is said to be millions of years old, the believers in Evolution simply reject that evidence. Evolution is kept alive by ignoring the evidence. So don't expect them to imbrace any new discoveries any time soon.

As sabz and myself have pointed out numerous times the figurines aren't accurate. You can only tout your clay toys so far, until we get some fossil evidence then you cannot logically conclude that man and dinosaurs lived at the same time.



This is not an accurate depiction of natural history:

Well... I did notice that the caveman only had 3 toes and 4 fingers but I figured that we probably evolved the rest later.:cavt-126-asard:

There are drawings and art work all over the world of men and dinosaurs together, and when human bones are found in strata that is said to be millions of years old, the believers in Evolution simply reject that evidence. Evolution is kept alive by ignoring the evidence. So don't expect them to imbrace any new discoveries any time soon.

The Earth is only 6,000 years old and it is inhabited by space aliens!!:eek:

Only just found out :eek:. We on this 'ere site have known for years. Ain't that right Sabz and FF?

all along. :p

What happened to the lumberjack figure?:frown:

I tired of it.

It was sort of an old inside joke. Another member known as pinochet accused me of being isolated from the rest of the country and called me "log cabin-man" because i guess everybody in Michigan lives in log cabins or something, so i embraced the nickname and donned the lumberjack avatar.


I am the duck now, because it amuses me.

Can I be the lumberjack?

I don't care.

I tired of it.

It was sort of an old inside joke. Another member known as pinochet accused me of being isolated from the rest of the country and called me "log cabin-man" because i guess everybody in Michigan lives in log cabins or something, so i embraced the nickname and donned the lumberjack avatar.


I am the duck now, because it amuses me.

There is also ancient art that depicts aliens...i suppose you believe those too?

Well when we can go back to an ancient culture and see pictures in their art work of a Triceratops, and a T. Rex which match what we know existed, I have no problem believeing that ancient man must of seen the same thing. When their art work shows pictures of animals that exist today, we believe that. Yet when they draw pictures of animals that scientest insist died off 75 million years ago, then we must refuse to believe those pictures? I believe dinosaurs existed just thousands of years ago, because the art work of ancient man depicts them. And I believe Evolutionest must deny what they can clearly see with their own eyes, because if refutes their belief system.
There is much more ancient art out there, that depicts dinosaurs.

Well when we can go back to an ancient culture and see pictures in their art work of a Triceratops, and a T. Rex which match what we know existed, I have no problem believeing that ancient man must of seen the same thing. When their art work shows pictures of animals that exist today, we believe that. Yet when they draw pictures of animals that scientest insist died off 75 million years ago, then we must refuse to believe those pictures? I believe dinosaurs existed just thousands of years ago, because the art work of ancient man depicts them. And I believe Evolutionest must deny what they can clearly see with their own eyes, because if refutes their belief system.
There is much more ancient art out there, that depicts dinosaurs.