Church of England to Apologise to Darwin

This has been a known fraud for years but yet it doesn't prevent creationist from circulating untruths to support their claims!



Paluxy River: it has been widely claimed by creationists that fossil human footprints have been found alongside dinosaur footprints at the Paluxy River near Glen Rose, Texas. Parker (1982), for example, claimed that they "are much more obviously human" than the Laetoli footprints. Scientists showed that many of them were indistinct or infilled dinosaur prints. Some other supposed footprints are either erosional features or, in a few cases (such as the Burdick footprint shown at right (Whitcomb and Morris 1961)), carvings. In 1984 the dinosaurian origin of many of the "better" prints was dramatically confirmed when Glen Kuban and Ron Hastings found color markings which preserved the outline of three-toed dinosaur feet. Although there have been some insinuations that these markings could be artificial stains, core samples show that they were caused by an infilling of secondary sediment into the prints. This evidence has caused most creationists to abandon the Paluxy footprints, although claims about them continue to circulate. For further details read Kuban (1996), or Strahler (1987). (See also Kuban's web site on the Paluxy River controversy"

Nevada Shoe Print?

Thereya go. Looks like a whole lot of assumption to me.

Nevada Shoe Print?

Thereya go. Looks like a whole lot of assumption to me.

That looks nothing like a foot print.

Is that it, is that all you have to bring down evolution?

Ok so lets try something different. So we, Sabz, FF and I all believe in Evolution and not creation, we have also demonstrated on occasion after occasion why we believe this and how the science works in order to show why we belive evolution and not creation.

So I have a challange for you, one i hope you are up for. Instead of trying to disprove evolution, which you have failed to do so far. Are you able to demonstrate to the three of us the science behind creation and how it is measured and tested independantly by respected geologists, biologists, geneticists and any other scientists that can help prove what it is you believe.

The Challange is set, if you are willing to accept it?

Why do you think it was a foot print? Did you not read the post? It was stated to be a shoe print, that is why it speaks of the thread prints.

No I could not possibly explain how creation actually happened, and I will not pretend I do. I only know the Bible speaks the truth and there is evidence out there that confirms much of that truth, so I have no reason to doubt it.
Evolution requires that the earth must be very old in order for Evolution to of occured. Yet we have a great deal of evidence to suggest that the earth is not nearly as old as some would suggest. However, the courts have blocked that evidence from being taught in the classroom. And that is the only way Evolution can be taught and believed, because all other evidenced taught in the classroom is considered illegal. So much for free thought.
Believers in Evolution will tell us that Dinosaurs died out 75 million years ago, yet all around the world we have ancient art that depicts early man and dinosaurs together. This art is ignored by the believers in Evolution, yet there is so much of it, one wonders how they can turn a blind eye to it.
Just consider the figurines of El Tore Mountain which were found in the 1940s

omniology.com

Why do you think it was a foot print? Did you not read the post? It was stated to be a shoe print, that is why it speaks of the thread prints.

No I could not possibly explain how creation actually happened, and I will not pretend I do. I only know the Bible speaks the truth and there is evidence out there that confirms much of that truth, so I have no reason to doubt it.
Evolution requires that the earth must be very old in order for Evolution to of occured. Yet we have a great deal of evidence to suggest that the earth is not nearly as old as some would suggest. However, the courts have blocked that evidence from being taught in the classroom. And that is the only way Evolution can be taught and believed, because all other evidenced taught in the classroom is considered illegal. So much for free thought.
Believers in Evolution will tell us that Dinosaurs died out 75 million years ago, yet all around the world we have ancient art that depicts early man and dinosaurs together. This art is ignored by the believers in Evolution, yet there is so much of it, one wonders how they can turn a blind eye to it.
Just consider the figurines of El Tore Mountain which were found in the 1940s

omniology.com

A discussion of Evolution proves Creationism by the fact that we discuss it.

And, I'm yet to see one evidence that a man become a man from another specie. It's all one huge missing link, as big as the explosion that created the earth.

The question of evolution is the existence of the material. There is not issues that evolution exists. It's given, if I pull my ear 5 times a day for the next 5 years it will grow bigger. But where is the initial matter came from. I believe there is Creator who created everything. Things and humans can vary based on the external factors, but the very first man was created. Isn't the biggest dispute of evolution that man wasn't created but evolved?

The question of evolution is the existence of the material. There is not issues that evolution exists. It's given, if I pull my ear 5 times a day for the next 5 years it will grow bigger. But where is the initial matter came from. I believe there is Creator who created everything. Things and humans can vary based on the external factors, but the very first man was created. Isn't the biggest dispute of evolution that man wasn't created but evolved?

I'm fine,

Just wanted to help my friend Numpty to find the truth

You are clutching at straws here, it doesn't look at all like a shoe print either.

You don't need to know how creation happend, but what should be readily available through tested science is that that it did happen and this is how it can be measured.

Fundamentally there should be an absolute abundence of evidence available that supports what you think, there should text book after text book of material pertaining to this idea. So where is it?