Ron Paul

No, but it is extraordinarily hypocritical to call themselves a "fair and balanced" news outlet, and then right before the New Hampshire primary, exclude the candidate that has raised more money, and in any poll other than ones sponsored by the MSM dominates the other candidates. It's a joke.

What do you expect from Fox,the treatment of Ron Paul in previous debates has been shocking.

I agree fox gave Crazy Ron Paul way too much air time while ignoring Duncan Hunter the only real conservative running

Newsmax.com - 2 Iowa Polls, 2 Different Results

2 Iowa Polls, 2 Different Results

-- THE RACE: The presidential race for Democrats, Republicans in Iowa.

___

THE NUMBERS - DEMOCRATS (CNN-Opinion Research Corp.)

Hillary Rodham Clinton, 33 percent

Barack Obama, 31 percent

John Edwards, 22 percent

THE NUMBERS - REPUBLICANS

Mitt Romney, 31 percent

Mike Huckabee, 28 percent

Fred Thompson, 13 percent

John McCain, 10 percent

Rudy Giuliani, 8 percent

Ron Paul, 8 percent

Ronny last again, oh the agony. Paulbots! A call to arms!!! LOL

EDIT This is an actual vote, not a poll.

Ronny last again, oh the agony. Paulbots! A call to arms!!! LOL

EDIT This is an actual vote, not a poll.

Lol, CNN (an irrefutably biased organization) selectively calls 373 people and you call that an accurate assessment? Give me a break, no make it 2. That calls for at least two breaks from sifting through all the bull**** in your post.

Lol, CNN (an irrefutably biased organization) selectively calls 373 people and you call that an accurate assessment? Give me a break, no make it 2.

Bloomberg.com: U.S.

In the Republican contest, in which actual votes are reported, Huckabee had 35,401 to Romney's 26,167 with 1,531 of 1,781 precincts reporting. Thompson was in third place with 13,834 votes. McCain, who had largely bypassed the state to concentrate on New Hampshire, followed with 13,556. Texas Representative Ron Paul followed with 10,040 votes.

That calls for at least two breaks from sifting through all the bull**** in your post

an acutal vote by WHO?
kinda like alexa

an acutal vote by WHO?

Two breaks to get through my two sentences, wow.

Iowans. Was in a hurry, forgot the rest.

Iowans yippy, a bunch of government subsidized, bible thumping "fundamentalist" farmers that are mostly democrat, sorry, but history has proven it doesn't mean a whole lot, everyone just gets a boner because they are the first voters. Huckabee is broke, Thompson is broke, McCain is probably in the better position than either one. Giuliani is banking on Florida, and it is going to be his downfall, and no amount of money Romney throws around can stop making him a) mormon b) a prefab plastic sound byte. A state where a lot of people live of the .gov tit are probably not going to be big RP fans, and he still placed decently.

Had Ron Paul one, Iowans would have been decent, hardworking, freedom loving Americans, am I correct?

One break to sigh, after realizing CNN was behind the poll. And another brief respite after seeing you call that an "actual vote" when it sampled 370 people over the phone.

I will concede that it ended up pretty close, but Iowa means jack ****.

Iowans yippy, a bunch of government subsidized, bible thumping "fundamentalist" farmers that are mostly democrat, sorry, but history has proven it doesn't mean a whole lot, everyone just gets a boner because they are the first voters. Huckabee is broke, Thompson is broke, McCain is probably in the better position than either one. Giuliani is banking on Florida, and it is going to be his downfall, and no amount of money Romney throws around can stop making him a) mormon b) a prefab plastic sound byte. A state where a lot of people live of the .gov tit are probably not going to be big RP fans, and he still placed decently.

They are decent, hard working, freedom loving Americans, but the fact is there are a lot of government subsidized farmers there, and a lot of peopole that view the .gov as a fallback, and are largely democrats, I know because I have a LOT of family there, and one was a government subsidized farmer.

You didn't mention where you thought your boy was gonna place over all? By your claim that most are broke, do you wish Paul could buy his way in?

No, you don't get the plan. Paul intends to convince officials that the portraits on money are registered voters.

Worse comes to worse, he'll just bribe the CFR. Everyone knows they choose our Presidents.

So being government subsidized makes them robots, mindless?