@FedUpAmerican,
I?d like to go back to the original question, snide remarks about who knows who aside, because I think that question is fundamental to the problems we are facing. I think its important to find the answers to that question if we ever want our country back.
FedUpAmerican;33328 wrote:What happened to the America that I once loved?
There are a number of answers to this question, but there are two in particular I?d like to focus on. They are greed and apathy.
The greed I?m talking about, though, isn?t the supposed greed of the nasty corporate empire, it?s the greed of the individual. The belief that simply by virtue of living in this country, we are owed something. That something we are owed changes as the political climate changes, but in the end, we have been led to believe that the nation, and the rest of the population, owes us something merely because we exist.
The America that I love is a land of opportunity. It is a land of rights. But we have lost sight of the fact that there are responsibilities that go with our rights. We have lost sight of the fact that opportunity does not equal accomplishment. We have lost sight of the fact that having equal opportunities does not guarantee equal outcomes. Fundamentally, we have lost sight of the fact that one individual?s rights end where another individual?s rights begin.
This can currently be seen in the debate over healthcare. Do we all have the right to equal access to healthcare? Of course we do, but not at others? expense. Consider our other rights: I have the right to free speech, but that does not mean the taxpayer has to provide funds for me to exercise that right. Even closer to the mark, the second amendment guarantees me the right to keep and bear arms. But, if I cannot afford arms, others do not have the responsibility to buy those arms for me. I cannot go to the government and make them provide me with a weapon because I cannot afford it.
In short, our greed has led us to believe that having a right somehow confers a responsibility on others. Nothing could be further from the intent of the constitution. Each of us has rights, but those rights cannot impose on the rights of others. Our greed has led us to think that having a right means that others must provide for that right. Absolute, utter nonsense. Such a statement is illogical, and followed to its conclusion ultimately destroys the fundamental underpinnings of the constitution.
As bad is our apathy. We no longer care enough about our nation to ensure that our elected officials represent us, rather than lead us. We have allowed the two main political parties to drag our political process down to the point of the lowest common denominator. Rather than having debates about the issues, we sling mud, and the one who is the least muddy at the end wins. Its tragic. As a result, honorable men and women, men and women well suited to actually representing the people simply refuse to subject themselves and their families to the mud-wrestling contest.
It is time for the US to take back her principles. Fundamental principles, such as limited government, which by and large stays out of the private lives of the people. A government that doesn?t concern itself with petty nonsense like who is diddling who. A government that doesn?t pander to those without the gumption to actually work to get ahead. A government that does not promise something for nothing, taking from those who actually worked to make the most of their opportunities, and giving it to those who won?t get off their backsides to change the channel on their soap operas.
Its time we again became a country of people who believe in the fundamental principle of standing on their own two feet. Its time to stop perpetuating the myth that the playing field isn?t level, and that those who have achieved owe something to those who have not.
And its well beyond time that we ?threw the bums out,? and demanded a higher standard from our elected officials. Maybe its even time to go back to the fundamental principle, espoused by Thomas Jefferson: ?The office should seek the man, not the man seek the office.?