Jimmy Carter kisses terrorist ass

1. or we're looking in the wrong ***ed country!

2. and again why did we wait until after 9/11 if he was such a threat? Because it wasn't about that and it never was. We went into Iraq for 3 reasons:
- To find WMDs
- To take Saddam out of power
- To "get 'em terrriss"

3. except we supported and helped these cruel dictators rise to power

4. Excuses? no they are not excuses they are the reasons the terrorists said they attacked us, but it largely goes ignored. Are they justified in their actions? No. The attacks are the result of bad foreign policy, by judging our actions i hope people will realize how bad our foreign policy really is and then we can change it. Yes they are angry at their leaders but they are angry at us for supporting their leaders.

5. You have yet to state a legitimate difference that the technology makes in foreign policy, so far all you've said is the today foreign entanglement is more "tempting" but that doesn't justify interventionism in the least.

6. That is a matter of corrupt governments.

7. well according to you it's their fault.

8. All people are essential just as stupid and greedy, the difference lies in the conditions one lives under.

3. As I stated, the leaders involved with aiding these people into power, had no ill intent toward the peoples of the nations effected.

4. I disagree with the terrorist. As I stated, the oil rich leaders have ignored the welfare of their constituents and blamed the west on their poverty. I never said the people were mad at their leaders. I said, their leaders lie to them about whose fault their problems are so some of them become terrorist and attack westerners. You and the terrorist may of course believe their lies. I will support the killing of the terrorist. You of course shall not be harmed. Unless you happen to be one of the terrorist's victims.

5. The major difference that the "founders" did not have to deal with, nor anticipate was attacks by organizations not working under orders from any particular government. Determining when and where to enter into conflict against an enemy that is not a government makes a nation attempting to protect itself open to all kinds of accusations.
As far as foreign policy in dealing with "governments" of other nations, has absolutely nothing to do with the conditions the people of those nations live in. "That" is between them and their government. Americans stand up to their government when ever they need to. Unhappy Arabs need to try that.

6. OK, so it's a matter of corrupt governments. No one can fix corrupt government better than the people. I don't particularly agree with your statement. I believe it's more like governments who either quietly support the actions of terrorist or are cowards.

7. Yes. It most certainly is.

8. My comments concerning stupidity and greed are directed thusly:
Greedy, filthy rich leaders who care nothing for their constituents and lie to the people concerning whose fault their dismal existence comes from.
Stupid people who fall, hook line and sinker into believing that anyone in the west actually "wants" them to live in poverty.
You continually bypass the comments I make concerning the fault of mid east poverty. Do not agree that it is the fault of the hoarding leaders of those nations? Do you insist that America or any other western nation may change their lives?

1. Irrelevant! Some of the worst things have been done with good intention. If your family and all worldly possessions were killed and destroyed, would it consolidate you any that it was done with "good intention"?

2. and you continue to believe the lie that our actions had nothing to do with their hatred towards us!

3. Okay, now we are getting somewhere!
"Nonintervention or Non-interventionism is a foreign policy which holds that political rulers should avoid alliances with other nations..."

Notice the definition says "nations", so violent rogue entities are not included and can be eliminated at will while still retaining non-interventionism.

4. would that not be a corrupt government?

5. On this we can agree to disagree.

6. My question was concerning the racial aspect of it. Are Arabs in general more greedy? If not then explain why in your opinion middle-easterners are more greedy!

American democracy's been diminishing since Regean's Presidency, but thanks to the corporate media, Regean's reverened as an American hero.

As I mentioned earlier, it's not the elected officials who rule America, it's the unelected bureaucracy that rules over America, which gives stiff resistance to the elected officials, such as JFK and Carter, who want to retake America from this bureaucracy and give it back to the people. So, this bureaucracy gave Carter a bad rap.

And you must be 5 years old. Carter catering to terrorists has been part of a larger US foreign policy.


Bet it's a name you've never heard before.

American democracy's been diminishing since Regean's Presidency, but thanks to the corporate media, Regean's reverened as an American hero.

As I mentioned earlier, it's not the elected officials who rule America, it's the unelected bureaucracy that rules over America, which gives stiff resistance to the elected officials, such as JFK and Carter , who want to retake America from this bureaucracy and give it back to the people. So, this bureaucracy gave Carter a bad rap.

1. No, it would not console me much. But, I would likely take "my" government
to task for allowing an outsider to have the effect on my world.
2. I care nothing as to the origin of people's hatred. Other than to be mechanically prepared to kill them before they can kill me and mine.
3.
4. Of course it would. And that would be an issue for the people of that government to settle.
5. OK
6. The average Arab is not more greedy. The leaders of Arab states have proven their greed over and over. Especially to the down trodden of their own nations.

1. and if they don't?
2. Perhaps this old addage will bring some perspective to you.

4. indeed, but where does that leave the blame?

6. Any man in position of such power would become greedy, no matter his racial background.

Yeah......well I've got news for Jimmy Boy -- Dubya just contracted me to overthrow Hugo Chavez. I'm catching a flight to Guyana tomorrow night. Cheney's gonna give me the low-down enroute. Watch me go.

[SIZE="4"]DIE, COMMIE SCUMBAG. DIE.[/SIZE] :AR15firing:

Look who's back,you will have to do better than the first attempt to overthrow Chavez pino.

Dubya called. He said, "Pino, don't worry. I'm not recordifcating this conversation. I need you on the Hugo Chavez case. I want'm gone, NOW. Ya follow'n me, Airborne?" Snapping to attention, I screamed, "SIR, YES, SIR", until turning blue in the face, and passing out. From there, it was to my gun locker...........................and private airfield. Oh, yeah. Chavez is going down. He's going down -- hard and face-first. :AR15firing:

Yeah......well I've got news for Jimmy Boy -- Dubya just contracted me to overthrow Hugo Chavez. I'm catching a flight to Guyana tomorrow night. Cheney's gonna give me the low-down enroute. Watch me go.

1. If they do not, I use the only recourse available to me. I vote.
That of course could change. When I become convinced that democracy no longer offers justice, I may be compelled to rebel.
2. Excellent addage, if not applicable. Were I the frog, he would have drowned before his sting. I would not have bargained with him in the first place.

4. At this stage, the blame is secondary to the outcome. The outcome being the removal of the corrupt government and it's ties to outside entities influencing the government's positive or negative effects on the people.
Thus making action by the people vital.
6. Absolutely not true. There are many many people above reproach.

I don't know about that, but Cheney be glad to take Pino along on one of his hunting trips.