@crackface mcgee,
crackface_mcgee;34004 wrote:Why are black Republicans so often referred to as "Uncle Toms"? Too many times I have heard this term in reference to Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, and other black Republicans.
I would think this would be particularly offensive to any African American, Democrat or Republican. Referring to a person of color as "Uncle Tom" simply because he or she is affiliated with the Republican party is basically saying that there should not be diversity of opinion within the black community. But I have heard this come out of the mouths of many white and black Democrats. This seems intolerant.
Thoughts?
I think the term is applied to blacks who are affiliated with the Republican Party, because they are viewed by other blacks as "sell outs".
Blacks who find themselves attracted to and subscribers of the Republican Party, are those usually in high income brackets, where loopholds and dividends benefiting "the rich and well-to-do", as well as corporate and filial ties, can improve one's social and economic standing.
Statistically speaking, most blacks fall outside of the upper echelons, hence their leaning, as a block toward the Democratic Party and its' principles, which are more favorable to their economic and social ascent.
Although there is much "tokenism" within the Republican Party, blacks, as a whole , are not embraced, or even "catered to".
One, whom I see as the poster child for being an "Uncle Tom", is none other than JC Watts, the former representative from the 4th district of Oklahoma, who now, routinely seen, as a "right wing" pundit for CNN. His unabashed support for the war, George Bush, and all things Republican, frequently "turns my stomach", and strikes me as pandering and disingenuous, as the Republican platforms rarely, if ever, benefit blacks, as a people, or as equal members of American society and enterprise.
Other examples, in high office, would, indeed be Condoleeza Rice, who is unapologetic for the missteps and misdeeds of this administration. Colin Powell, who has had his heretofore "unblemished' reputation "tarnished" by having to spread "the lies, as truth", about the Iraq War and Saddam's supposed WMD, before the UN, almost certainly regrets his blind and silent involvement with the administration, and indirectly, the "Republican agenda", as he, now readily admits.