halliburton

First rule of Liberaltards Pino when they are losing a debate it comes down to personal insults and your ability to spell. I personally spell as many words as I can wrong as a social science experiment. Someday I shall publish all the tripe and slather and blather the left posts on forums. It will be a hoot to read.

simply because conservatives (notice I didn't impugn your ideology) are known to be "poor losers".

And there are plenty of material available, including online dictionaries, to aid in one's intelligent discourse...it is a "cop out" and an indication of 'being trifling" for one to repeatedly "misspell words'...Lazy.

Or you pull out the race card and claim oppression and victimization.

Dr, I never use the race card...I don't use cards, period. When others make race an issue, I point it out, plain and simple. Where there is oppression, I point it out, plain and simple. I don't play the victim. If that is your perception then it is "ill-conceived".

I would think a poor loser is some one who gets emotional and says he is leaving, lashes out in the supposedly last few posts but consistentley keeps coming back and the leaving and then coming back. Wouldn't you agree?
A loser is someone who would have responded negatively to "bullying", which I almost did, but fortunately, came to realize that it wasn't me that was the issue or the problem, and that I should stick around and fight for my beliefs and "represent"....can you dig it? I guess not. And I'm never emotional...although I plead guilty to passionate.

Who elected you spell check police?

Before you issue any thing, i'd like to see your credentials.

"Bogged down in the anti-war mindset"? Whatever ace, I was IN this war. How many muslims have you killed? An once again your ignorance, or just complete ignoring of my position is showing. I am FAR from anti-war. I am pro-correct war, and I hate to tell you this, Iraq is not the correct "war". It is an exercise in nation building, and corporate tax scam.

Let me turn your attention to the monkey in office. Here are some exerts from Bushs debate with Al Gore in 2000...

We can help build coalitions but we can't put our troops all around the world. We can lend money but we have to do it wisely. We shouldn't be lending money to corrupt officials. So we have to be guarded in our generosity.

BUSH: Started off as a humanitarian mission and it changed into a nation-building mission, and that's where the mission went wrong. The mission was changed. And as a result, our nation paid a price. And so I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building. I think our troops ought to be used to fight and win war. I think our troops ought to be used to help overthrow the dictator when it's in our best interests. But in this case it was a nation-building exercise, and same with Haiti. I wouldn't have supported either.

BUSH: I don't think so. I think what we need to do is convince people who live in the lands they live in to build the nations. Maybe I'm missing something here. I mean, we're going to have kind of a nation building core from America? Absolutely not. Our military is meant to fight and win war. That's what it's meant to do. And when it gets overextended, morale drops.

BUSH: Let me comment on that. I'm not so sure the role of the United States is to go around the world and say this is the way it's got to be. We can help. And maybe it's just our difference in government, the way we view government. I want to empower the people. I want to help people help themselves, not have government tell people what to do. I just don't think it's the role of the United States to walk into a country and say, we do it this way, so should you.


There's your figurehead. Running on a sound foreign policy, then completely turning it around to preserve big money interest in the name of "fighting terrorist" The sheeple are blinded by the flag he tied over there eyes. It's a worse case study in "say it enough, and it becomes true". People don't even question it.

Excellent post 92B!

And thanks for your service to this country in and out of this stupid war!:thumbup:

Oh ****, if there are any spell check police I am in big ass trouble!

No one elected me...I just sorta fell into the vacancy....by the way, the word is "consistently". And I'm issuing you " a ticket " ! LOL

A loser is someone who would have responded negatively to "bullying",

Dr, I never use the race card...I don't use cards, period.

"Bogged down in the anti-war mindset"? Whatever ace, I was IN this war. How many muslims have you killed?

An once again your ignorance, or just complete ignoring of my position is showing. I am FAR from anti-war. I am pro-correct war, and I hate to tell you this, Iraq is not the correct "war". It is an exercise in nation building, and corporate tax scam.

Well if your opinion is correct and this was is illegal, and we went in for oil, that makes you a murderer. So how many Muslims did you murder?
Since when is nation building illegal? Do you have this kind of problem with what we did with Germany and Japan?

Since when is nation building illegal? Do you have this kind of problem with what we did with Germany and Japan?

Well if your opinion is correct and this was is illegal, and we went in for oil, that makes you a murderer. So how many Muslims did you murder?
Since when is nation building illegal? Do you have this kind of problem with what we did with Germany and Japan?

Under the US Constitution Congress is not authorized to permit the president to go to war. CONGRESS MUST DECLARE WAR. Japanese and German reconstruction was LEGAL (though ill-advised some might say) because they were captures of land and water (Article I Sec 8, US Constitution). However, rebuilding a nation without a declaration of war is illegal because the Constitution demands a declaration of war.

Not only that, but we didn't occupy Germany and Japan to rebuild them, we occupied them to DE-industrialize them, and de-nazify Germany, to make sure they could NOT continue making war. In Iraq we are continuing to arm the same sunnis that were killing us a few months ago, and selling billions in arms to Saudi, the largest state sponsors of terrorism....ever.

Also the American taxpayers weren't being bilked for hundreds of billions of dollars a month for private corporations to rebuild Germany, and Japan.

Well if your opinion is correct and this was is illegal, and we went in for oil, that makes you a murderer. So how many Muslims did you murder?
Since when is nation building illegal?

It's what George Bush pledged "not to do", in his presidential campaign back in 2000. He said America shouldn't be involved in nation building....one of his first bald-faced lies....as we now know, plans were underway, to do just that, a scant 7 months into his first term.

Under the US Constitution Congress is not authorized to permit the president to go to war. CONGRESS MUST DECLARE WAR. Japanese and German reconstruction was LEGAL (though ill-advised some might say) because they were captures of land and water (Article I Sec 8, US Constitution). However, rebuilding a nation without a declaration of war is illegal because the Constitution demands a declaration of war.

Blah, blah, blah, blah

Broken records get thrown in the trash.