Who has proof.

And we know yours.

In Iraq? :wtf:

Not specifically, of course, but he put the U.S. in a 'hyper-state' that made Saddam Hussein's future tenuous, given the bad blood that existed between him and America. Also, I believe he really did try to convince us he had weapons of mass destruction. He was playing a calculated game that reversed itself and bit him in the arse. :no:

Pino,im am fortunate enough thanks to satellite TV,to get news from different country's,not the news from a purely amercan perspective,i happened to watch an excellent documentary the other night about the coverage of the war in Iraq by american news stations,and how it differed from other country's more impartial points of view.

Well im sure you have looked through many threads on the forum,you must know my point of view by know.

Need not be clever to see your ways.

More impartial, LOL. This is coming from the country with no agenda right? Got a link from this masterpiece of unbiased media journalism?

Here's a link for ya Scoob, Saddam Hussein's Philanthropy of Terror - by Deroy Murdock

Abny link between AQ and Saddam has been discredited

Still don't change the facts of the case. A judge in a court of law found them linked. It's in the law books.Any link? Who discredited this one?

Trying to link saddam an AQ was used by the Bush government prior and in the aftermath of the war,you dont hear them speaking about it now,because it was untrue,if you still want to believe it,then thats up to you,even people within the CIA didnt buy it,what law books is it in ? because there certainly was no proof.

I gave you proof, you are in denial of it, not my problem. Are you sure you don't have a little french in you?

In an American court of law a link was found and judgment given. End of story. I don't care if your in denial of it. If it's complete rubbish, debunk the story?

What the Bush government did,was try to link 9/11 and AlQueda to Saddam and the war on terror,what was the real reason they ent to war in Iraq,Saddam was not a threat,he had no intentions of attacking the US or invading Kuwait again,the no-fly zones in the north & south of the country kept him firmly in check.

I've posted this several times before, I'm surprised you haven't read it by now

I was in the military during the Clinton Administration, I received annual terrorism briefings which claimed a link between Bin Laden and Iraq well before Bush was in office. I don't really fault you because it's not like you were in the room. You have however come to endorse the ignorant belief that everything was concocted by Bush; the fact is not only did Bush have bad intel, Clinton had bad intel, the English had bad independent intel, even the UN had the wrong info. This could have been avoided had Saddam kept to his agreement and not kicked inspectors out, that act alone warranted military action as per the 1991 agreement which ended the Kuwait conflict.

The reality is less popular because it doesn't have a singular bad guy, it's more of a collection of poorly made observations and decisions over a 12 year period (91-03). But that's hardly entertaining enough, Michael Mooooooooore could never make a movie about that.

In an American court of law a link was found and judgment given. End of story. I don't care if your in denial of it. If it's complete rubbish, debunk the story?