1
   

Obama (finally) speaks on racist preacher

 
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 09:03 am
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56476 wrote:
Post what you like, i'll do the same. Rhetoric or not, a terrorist org supports him. You and them have something in common, LOL.


Not anywhere near as bad as supporting a terrorist organization. Or didn't you know we did that kinda thing. Regean's Iran-Contra, Chiquita's paid death squads, you fuel your car... Lookit that! Yer supporting dem turrorists!
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:11 am
@Silverchild79,
What does your car run on?
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 10:13 am
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56484 wrote:
Not anywhere near as bad as supporting a terrorist organization. Or didn't you know we did that kinda thing. Regean's Iran-Contra, Chiquita's paid death squads, you fuel your car... Lookit that! Yer supporting dem turrorists!


That Regean guy was a real asshole, wasn't he?
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 02:18 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;56515 wrote:
That Regean guy was a real ***, wasn't he?


http://www.buzzflash.com/anderson/04/06/images/08Reagan.jpg

Hate to smack Jesus 2 around much, but hey... truth.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 02:19 pm
@DiversityDriven,
DiversityDriven;56514 wrote:
What does your car run on?


So you admit to supporting terrorism?
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 08:18 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;56445 wrote:
and it's immoral.


Yeah. But life is life.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Apr, 2008 08:48 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;56543 wrote:
Yeah. But life is life.


yeah i'm sure thats how the USSR felt, huh?
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Apr, 2008 04:50 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56523 wrote:
http://www.buzzflash.com/anderson/04/06/images/08Reagan.jpg

Hate to smack Jesus 2 around much, but hey... truth.


Yeah, if you live in the liberal fantasy land of editorial cartoonists. Only liberals could oppose something that would stop nukes from hitting us.
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Apr, 2008 05:46 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;56573 wrote:
Yeah, if you live in the liberal fantasy land of editorial cartoonists. Only liberals could oppose something that would stop nukes from hitting us.


The only thing that stopped the USSR from hitting us with nukes is their fear of our nukes.
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Apr, 2008 05:58 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;56573 wrote:
Yeah, if you live in the liberal fantasy land of editorial cartoonists. Only liberals could oppose something that would stop nukes from hitting us.


Is it me, or is "the nukes" the ace of spades in a Republican deck? No matter what, you can rely on that bad boy to pull ya through. Need a reason to start a war? Nukes! They'll nuke us!

How many nukes were fired at us again?

The Cold War was the scariest d*ck waving contest in human history. But it was still just a massive d*ck waving contest.


It's also neat to note that you don't actually address the points made in that "liberal fantasy world of editorial cartoons". Why not?
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Apr, 2008 06:41 pm
@Fatal Freedoms,
Fatal_Freedoms;56577 wrote:
The only thing that stopped the USSR from hitting us with nukes is their fear of our nukes.


M.A.D.
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Apr, 2008 06:42 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56578 wrote:
Is it me, or is "the nukes" the ace of spades in a Republican deck? No matter what, you can rely on that bad boy to pull ya through. Need a reason to start a war? Nukes! They'll nuke us!

How many nukes were fired at us again?

The Cold War was the scariest d*ck waving contest in human history. But it was still just a massive d*ck waving contest.


It's also neat to note that you don't actually address the points made in that "liberal fantasy world of editorial cartoons". Why not?


Do you run a meth-lab?
Fatal Freedoms
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Apr, 2008 07:26 pm
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;56582 wrote:
M.A.D.


exactly. :cool:
0 Replies
 
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 04:56 am
@Pinochet73,
Pinochet73;56583 wrote:
Do you run a meth-lab?


Do you smoke crack?
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 06:26 am
@Silverchild79,
Townhall.com::Character Questions::By Brian Fitzpatrick

Take cover, ABC! Incoming!

“[Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos] disgraced the American voters, and in fact even disgraced democracy itself.” – Will Bunch, Philadelphia Daily News

“Perhaps the most embarrassing performance by the media in a major presidential debate in years.” – Greg Mitchell, Editor & Publisher

“… all the substance of a Beavis and Butt-Head marathon.” – Walter Shapiro, Salon

“… petty, shallow, process-obsessed…utterly divorced from the actual issues that Americans want to talk about.” – Andrew Sullivan, The Atlantic

“…Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos turned in shoddy, despicable performances.” – Tom Shales, The Washington Post

What could ABC’s Democratic presidential debate moderators possibly have done to elicit such vitriol from the elite liberal media?

Stabbing the sacred cows, that’s what. Leftwingers in the media and the blogosphere are furious that during Wednesday’s debate, the ABC journalists had the effrontery to ask Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton some tough character, values and judgment questions the candidates would rather not answer.

______________________


Click for the rest.
0 Replies
 
DiversityDriven
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 06:29 am
@Silverchild79,
Townhall.com::Beware: Obamutopia::By David Limbaugh

Barack Obama, stubbornly clinging to his right to be charismatically shallow, at first complained that Hillary Clinton was unfairly criticizing him for being all flair and fluff with no substance. Now he's upset that Clinton and the media won't let him discuss substance. Based on some of his speeches lately, I'm thinking he ought to be grateful for the diversion because his policy proposals might not survive serious scrutiny.

Maybe it's unfair to interpret literally Obama's repeated stump speech assertion that we Americans aren't perfect but are "perfectible" and conclude he possesses a New Age or secular humanist worldview rather than a Christian one, which clearly rejects the notion of man's perfectibility.

Then again, his policy proposals do sound strikingly utopian -- almost as if he's saying we truly can achieve perfection, end poverty, eradicate health care problems, establish universal harmony, legislate away all corruption, and attain wholesale energy independence without, by the way, liberating ourselves from the shackles of enviro-policemen, who forbid us from exploiting our own resources.

Obama's pitch to fawning audiences is so hopelessly idealistic and his promises so painfully unrealistic that it's amazing he's taken as seriously as he is.

___________________

Some sheeple here appear to be followers of his faith as well.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 02:33 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56629 wrote:
Do you smoke crack?


Because if you do, he's got an offer he thinks you'd be interested in.
0 Replies
 
Reagaknight
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 02:36 pm
@Silverchild79,
Quote:
How many nukes were fired at us again?

The Cold War was the scariest d*ck waving contest in human history. But it was still just a massive d*ck waving contest.


I'm sure they felt this way during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Quote:
It's also neat to note that you don't actually address the points made in that "liberal fantasy world of editorial cartoons". Why not?


I'm not sure where to start with "He confused old movies with foreign policy."
Sabz5150
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 02:41 pm
@Reagaknight,
Reagaknight;56644 wrote:
I'm sure they felt this way during the Cuban Missile Crisis.


And I am sure that the ground will be habitable in 30 or so more years.

Quote:
I'm not sure where to start with "He confused old movies with foreign policy."


Cool, ditch that one. Focus on the death squads and apartheid.
0 Replies
 
Pinochet73
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2008 07:10 pm
@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;56629 wrote:
Do you smoke crack?


Do you smoke blunts?Very Happy
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 07:30:08