@Silverchild79,
Silverchild79;39929 wrote:thank you for perfectly illustrating the flaw in the "Ron Paul Foreign Policy Logic" (if it can even be called that)
we overthrow a brutal dictator for fear he might arm terrorists and continual noncompliance of UN resolutions and it's "an illegal act of war"
but Iran attempts to overthrow a free elected government, one who requests our presence in their country, and they kill US soldiers. And your response is that you understand? Who's side are you on, we aren't in Iran, by the Ron Paul logic it should be none of their business.
But that logic is only applied when it's us doing it, radical Islam gets a pass because they don't like Bush either
Supplying weapons and outright invasion are two entirely different things, and you know it. I wish Iran would not supply weapons to kill Americans, but WE WOULD DO THE SAME THING if Canada was occupied by China. The Iraqi government is not freely elected, the clerics were excluded from the elections remember? So they're about as democratically elected as the Regional Soviets of the SFR's.
Further, we oppose the occupation of Iraq, but we're there, and we accept reality. In reality, we understand WHY Iran would send weapons to Iraq, and while we DISAGREE with the action because it only furthers the war, we UNDERSTAND it. Neocons seem to think that Iran is sending weapons, and thus is simply evil, without acknowledging the political and military situation of Iran. They are SURROUNDED by openly hostile forces who have labelled them "evil", WHAT WOULD YOU DO???? You can't seek resolution until you understand your opponent's motivation and concerns, it's called negotiation, and it's worked for centuries, going on millenia.
You obviously have no grasp of international relations. Ron Paul adovates a foreign policy that combines elements of realism and constructivism (I assume you know what these terms mean, if you don't, don't bother discussing this issue with me) into a policy of domestic power and foreign discussion which yields a more peaceful, more secure, and more free WORLD. Your lack of comprehension in this policy realm is startling given how vocal you are. Them/bad, we/good is idiotic foreign policy thinking and reflects the global understanding of a six year-old.
It's been said in this topic already, but I'll say it again. The US supplies weapons to horrible people all over the world, and along with the rest of the permanent members of the Security Council, represents the largest arms racket in the world. Who the hell are we to condemn Iran for sending weapons to Sh'ia militias? At least they're from the region, most of our arms sales are intercontinental.