BREAKING NEWS: Lebanon Military attacks Al Qaeda camp

he isn't in BIn Laden's chain of command but over half of Al Qeada is disconnected from the mother ship. Al Qeada is the first franchiseable terrorist organization.

No they are under the control of Syria. It's a little two convenient that this thing kicks off exactly at the same time Lebanon seeks a tribunal with the UN over their former PM who has allegedly assassinated by Syria.

It's a little two convenient that this thing kicks off exactly at the same time Lebanon seeks a tribunal with the UN over their former PM who has allegedly assassinated by Syria

Thanks, I said this on Hondaswap a couple years ago. Now, how do you figure that being in Iraq is fighting it?

No attacks on our soil.

I don't have to deny anything

Terrorists go there to exact revenge and directly attack us.

Why not keep drawing them in to kill them?

Moreover, what they want now more than anything else is another international staging base, as they had in Afghanistan. Iraq, with its oil money, geo-centric location in the Persian Gulf, and potential for perennial, internal chaos and conflict, is a perfect match. Al Qaeda would flourish in an Iraq abandoned by the West.

Thanks, I said this on Hondaswap a couple years ago. Now, how do you figure that being in Iraq is fighting it?

Yea, ok, except as already stated, the attacks did not come from Iraq. You really are dense. If the war had anything to do with terrorism we would be in Syria, Iran, or any number of other countries that not only support, but commit terrorist acts to this day.

Yea, ok, except as already stated, the attacks did not come from Iraq.

You really are dense.

If the war had anything to do with terrorism we would be in Syria, Iran, or any number of other countries that not only support, but commit terrorist acts to this day

Wrong again.

So you believe Saddam didn't terrorise Kuwait, what about the kurds? Syria and Iran are at the head of the list or didn't you know? North Korea is on the list too. And any other country the harbors terrorists.
So in your own words what do you think this was is about, you gonna go for the War for Oil senario again, yet you admit you and your fellow soldiers were not there for that? That Bush is one smart dude, he's got you convinced you didn't kill over there for oil, who's the fool?

Quote:

Not correct, most violence is internal, and even more is directed at Iraqs new government from it's own population.

Like I said before, Iraq is going to cause Iraq to fail.



Because that is not happening.



Our presence has helped terrorist organizations ranks recruit by occupying Iraq. More and more Iraqis have joined to help get us out of their country. Previous to our invasion, Saddam did not like Binny, and had no part of him, as he stood for something Iraqis didn't have, "freedom", or at least a sick and twisted, muslim version of it. Read the article I posted in the Ron Paul thread. If the middle east was united and parked themselves in Ohio, and was policing the US after decades of telling us what to do, and setting up state dictatorships, we'd be up in arms against them too. But let me guess? It's ok, because they are muslim scum, and deserve to die? amirite?!?

Not correct, most violence is internal, and even more is directed at Iraqs new government from it's own population.

Because that is not happening.

Our presence has helped terrorist organizations ranks recruit by occupying Iraq.

More and more Iraqis have joined to help get us out of their country.

Previous to our invasion, Saddam did not like Binny, and had no part of him, as he stood for something Iraqis didn't have, "freedom", or at least a sick and twisted, muslim version of it.

Read the article I posted in the Ron Paul thread. If the middle east was united and parked themselves in Ohio, and was policing the US after decades of telling us what to do, and setting up state dictatorships, we'd be up in arms against them too. But let me guess? It's ok, because they are muslim scum, and deserve to die? amirite

Nope, I am correct, and it has been proven, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Remember, that's why Bush had to change the story ten times before we invaded.



You are the fool. There's a big difference between why we as soldiers were fighting, and why Bush sent us there. And I don't give a **** about Kuwait, or the Kurds, neither does Bush.

You are the fool. There's a big difference between why we as soldiers were fighting, and why Bush sent us there.

And I don't give a **** about Kuwait, or the Kurds, neither does Bush

The proof that Saddam worked with bin Laden | Iraq | Middle East | International News | News | Telegraph
Case Closed
Saddam, bin Laden link found: Canadian reporter
If you like you can try and discredit all three but there are plenty more?

Secret documents uncovered in the bombed headquarters of Iraq's former spy agency show the first clear link between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden's terrorist network, according to a Canadian journalist.
Mitch Potter, a foreign correspondent with the Toronto Star, says he discovered the file while digging through what's left of the Mukhabarat intelligence office. The CIA had already looked over the rubble and left.

Iraqi intelligence documents discovered in Baghdad by The Telegraph have provided the first evidence of a direct link between Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda terrorist network and Saddam Hussein's regime.

Papers found yesterday in the bombed headquarters of the Mukhabarat, Iraq's intelligence service, reveal that an al-Qa'eda envoy was invited clandestinely to Baghdad in March 1998.

Yea, from 2005 saying they were planning to use Iraq as a staging ground, nice timing on his part with all push to get out of Iraq. Hook, line, and sinker. Smells like a load of poop to me.

If it were fabrication, unfortunatly it's very much fact.