If Jesus was God ...

Question

Why you -christias- don't listen when The bible stated that Jesus (PBUH) was a PROPHET!?:

Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, "A great prophet has arisen among us!" and, "God has visited His people! This report concerning Him went out all over Judea and in all the surrounding district." [Luke 7:16-17]

What message has God hidden? I believe God has been obvious about His message. It seems to me, you have worked hard to deny His message, and often ignore what is clearly stated in the Scriptures.

Christ death on the Cross was real, and the Bible clearly tells us that human conscious does not end at death. So there is no twisted philosophy here, just your denial of Biblical fact. I myself had a taste of life beyond death. In 1969 I accidently got caught on a 7,400 volt eletrical line. While I was laying on the ground and unable to move I was able to see things that I should not of been able to see, yet I now understand that it was not my physical eyes that gave me this ability, rather my spiritual eyes.

The Questions No Christian Wants to Answer..continue without any real challenge

QUESTION:

In John 3.16 states 'FOR GOD SO LOVED THE WORLD THAT HE GAVE HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON THAT WHOSOEVER BELIEVE IN HIM SHALL NOT PERISH BUT HAVE EVERLASTING LIFE'... This is the most basic teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ which is very clear to all Christian and Muslim alike unless you refused to believe. Is 'WHOSOEVER' in this text has gender? Jesus must have said 'THAT ONLY MAN WHO BELIEVE IN HIM' to agree with your argument... 'WHOSOEVER' is a combination of male and female, men and women not man/male alone.... I believe this explanation will suffice.....

The Questions No Christian Wants to Answer..continue without any real challenge

QUESTION:USCCB - NAB - 2 Maccabees 15

That's a general statement and it does not explicitly mean WOMEN are included or that WOMEN will enter the Kingdom of God.

I have posted to you a passage that's explicitly states only MEN will enter the Kingdom of God:

"These are the ones who have not been defiled with WOMEN, for they have kept themselves chaste. These are the ones who follow the Lamb wherever He goes. These have been purchased from among men as first fruits to God and to the Lamb." [ Rv:14:4 ]

I know -as a Muslim- that Jesus (PBUH), as all messengers, was sent with a message that included MEN and WOMEN. I have no doubt about that.

But my question intention is to expose the fabrications in the bible and to show that this bible is not really the word of God which had been revealed to Jesus (PBUH). It's a man-made book. The original Injeel (the sacred book revealed to Jesus) was lost due to the continuous alterations and corruptions by men.

That's what you think and we think otherwise. I know women are included in the kingdom of God and I knew the Bible (in original text) is the true words of God. How can you say that there was original Injeel? How can you say that it was lost due to continuous alterations and corruption of men? God will not permit the original Injeel be lost if ever there is one. Or you are saying hearsay only without basis? Prove that the Bible is not the word of God and I will prove to you otherwise....

Only Catholics accepted the doctrine of Maccabees and other books not included in our belief. You can only find these books in the Catholic books like New American Bible. Not all Christians accepted this doctrine.....

The origianl copies of the bible are missing. Remember that Jesus (PBUH) spoke Aramaic while the copies of the bible were in Greek!

The Injeel which was given to Jesus (PBUH) by God should sound as God himself speaks to the reader not like those man-made bibles!

The main purpose of this thread is to help the interested readers to open their minds to the fact that the current bibles are just man-made books and not the word of God. I am trying to provide you with proofs from your own man-made bible where I show you the many numerical & scientific errors and contradictions in those bibles. A real Divine book would never contain any single error or contradiction because it's from the Creator.

Those books were written by men but inspired by God... There are many alleged discrepancies of the Bible but they can be explained and justified..

'The Injeel which was given to Jesus (PBUH) by God' Where did you get this information? Is there a proof that God gave Injeel to Jesus? There must be basis in what you are saying to validate your point. Let us stick with the Bible which is existing and not defend your understanding based on hearsay only....

If you were looking with spiritual eyes then you should know that God would not lower Himself to bestiality with a human just to create Himself. Give your head a shake man.

Regards
DL

That's true. And this should make you think how a book claimed to be Divine has many different versions and some have 73 gosbels and the other have 66!

Nevertheless, I will continue to provoke your mind by posting other major errors and contradictions from your own bible.

That's what you think and we think otherwise. I know women are included in the kingdom of God and I knew the Bible (in original text) is the true words of God. How can you say that there was original Injeel? How can you say that it was lost due to continuous alterations and corruption of men? God will not permit the original Injeel be lost if ever there is one. Or you are saying hearsay only without basis? Prove that the Bible is not the word of God and I will prove to you otherwise....

The books of the Bible are those that made the final cut.
Are the other books that were rejected the divine word of God as well?

Regards
DL

Rabbits does not chew their cud which is scientifically False because the Bible does not indicate rabbits but Hares. Hare is very different from Rabit althogh they look similar but in different class.
Hare chew their cud which is scientifically correct.

I suggest you look for the right translation of the Bible before you quote. It will back fire on you. Be very careful.... As I said before , there are many translation of the Bible. do not depend on one only, it will not help. Buy all translations and compare it with each other, it will help.... Buy knowledge but do not sell ... as the Bible said....

You are desperately trying to find any apologetic nonsense excuse for the clear contradictions and errors in your bible.

Even if you use another word "hare" for "Rabbit" (its cousin), do you think you were successful in giving an acceptable excuse for the fabrication of the bible that contradicts basic scientific facts !!?


Hares and Rabbits are NOT ruminant animals and this is a scientifc fact.

For the sake of argument, if you -still out of arrogance- want to continue denying this fact, then show from a known scientific website that Hares are ruminant.

Even in respected christian websites, they admit that the hare is not ruminant. The following statement is quoted from the "International Standard Bible Encyclopedia":

"..The hare and the coney are not ruminants, but might be supposed to be from their habit of almost continually moving their jaws."

This is the link: Hare - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

Does the Bible said ruminant? The Bible said 'chews the cud' not ruminant to be exact. The Hare chews cud and it is scientifically correct... Cud chewing is the process where half digested vegetation was rechewed and Hare chews the cud.... Do you want to bet????