Children

That's one way of looking at it. Or it could be you just talk gibberish, as has been shown, and don't answer anything rationally.
In that case you are not a Christian, you're a Drnalinian. You present yourself as the figurehead of your own personal faith.

You can call a piece of **** a diamond, but it will still be a piece of ****.

That's one way of looking at it. Or it could be you just talk gibberish, as has been shown, and don't answer anything rationally.

In that case you are not a Christian, you're a Drnalinian. You present yourself as the figurehead of your own personal faith.

You can call a piece of **** a diamond, but it will still be a piece of ****.

The point of religion is to show people the right path, but it doesn't appear to be doing this, Christians disagree with Muslims, Jews, atheists, even other Christians.

So we're back to subjective opinion on how you get into heaven. Surely only one "person" knows what it takes to get into heaven. Why is it a secret?

The Bible says that "God" gave Moses the stone tablets already carved. I don't believe it, but that is "God's" version of events so if you belive in "God" that is the way it happened. You claim to believe in "God" but you overrule him. Free will isn't special, everyone has it. You certainly aren't a good Christian, you deny "God's" word and defy it.
A rebuttal is standard procedure for an argument, all you are is a contradiction. Basically you have nothing to say and are simply trolling. Other people want to actually use this forum, not spam it with useless crap.

A rebuttal is standard procedure for an argument, all you are is a contradiction. Basically you have nothing to say and are simply trolling. Other people want to actually use this forum, not spam it with useless crap

No, but I prefer the blind to be genuine.

That's your opinion.

Question: "What makes your morality better than anyone elses?".
Your answer: "your wrong".

Amazing that happens when you believe in something.

I've seen plenty of diamonds that were pieces of **** as well. Feeling guilty huh?

They all are a question of faith, in what is a diferent matter.

I don't believe, neither do I agree with the concept of heaven, but it isn't a secret if you practice most any religion it is a simple matter of following dogma.

Exactly, so if Christians re-write their dogma to suit their own purposes they will fail to get into heaven in the event that it does actually exist.

Simply having faith isn't enough

Really where does the bible say that? Can you quote it for me?

1 At that time the LORD said to me, "Chisel out two stone tablets like the first ones and come up to me on the mountain. Also make a wooden chest. [a] 2 I will write on the tablets the words that were on the first tablets, which you broke. Then you are to put them in the chest."

A rebuttal is what ever i post, you have no control and it angers you. I have plenty to say, that is why i keep coming back. Other people can and do use this forum even with all our posts, its amazing huh? The useless crap is coming from both sides, why do you exclude yourself?

A little subjective don't you think.

Faith is an absolute term, there is no eventuality. Either you believe or you don't, and belief is not just something you can plan for the occasion.

Do you have anything else?

Passage Deuteronomy 10 :


Just what is the world comming to when an atheist has to give a "Christian" Bible study?

Of course you may interpret this to mean whatever you want, afterall the Bible is nothing more than a guide book is it not? A guide book which includes the direct commandments from "God" which you choose not to take literally.
Your rebuttals are useless without evidence to back them up, my posts have remained on topic and to the point. You have been talking gibberish as has already been shown.

Just what is the world comming to when an atheist has to give a "Christian" Bible study?

Of course you may interpret this to mean whatever you want, afterall the Bible is nothing more than a guide book is it not?

Your rebuttals are useless without evidence to back them up, my posts have remained on topic and to the point.

My opinion is subjective, what of it?

I'm not a Christian by your definition.

Any book writen by man at best can only be used as a guide.

First they are not rebuttals now they are, make up your mind. If i recall, the topic in nowhere near what you think it is. Children, and Jesus's preferred method of killing, I don't think you ever answered that one. What it the atheist preferred method?

Just making sure your human.

Christian: A person who is a believer in Jesus Christ and his teachings

It's a pretty standard, universal definition. Not just mine.
Even when it's dictated to him by "God"? Is your local minister aware of your lack of faith?
The topic was never anywhere near Jesus' preferred method of killing children. It was the preferred method of Christians and you stated that as a "Christian" you personally favoured abortion. Good for you.

Even when it's dictated to him by "God"? Is your local minister aware of your lack of faith?

The topic was never anywhere near Jesus' preferred method of killing children. It was the preferred method of Christians and you stated that as a "Christian" you personally favoured abortion. Good for you

Is that all the proof you need? So those who follow objective faith are inhuman?

So you fancy me Christian or Atheist? What ever you decide i'm sure the rest will go along with.

God is infalible man is not. I've got the number to my parish, you wanna call him?

Where in the first post is "Christians" mentioned? I never stated my preferred method was abortion, i suppose you read into that one too. So again, what is the Atheist preferred method for killing children?

No but ill settle for it. What makes objective different?

Buy a ******* dictionary.

First Bible class, now you want English lessons. :beat: