Did Jesus even exist?

I could tell it was a question by the questionmark at the end. This thread question comes from you. Some one who does not believe in a supposed god. Your point of view is coming from "Jesus didn't exist" and you are asking for us to provide you with some evidence. That is why some are responding to you from that view question.

Your belief in spirits and how you want one of the things you felt from that supposed spirit to be "your God."

You ask us for proof of Jesus's existence, i asked you for proof of "your God." You said you had none but you were sure it was there because you felt it. Do you understand how hipocritical that sounds?
If every Christian makes this claim then it should be very easy for you to proof it? Name one and back it up?

You're simply an idiot. I asked you the question pages ago, "Do you deny that Mazda is the one true god?" I gave you your example. It's not my fault that you're ignorant of other religions. So keep avoiding the question.

You're simply an idiot.

I asked you the question pages ago, "Do you deny that Mazda is the one true god?"

I gave you your example.

It's not my fault that you're ignorant of other religions.

So keep avoiding the question

You also seem to assume that embracing cristianity is the same as saying that you simply do not follow every other religion. Tolerance and belief are diferent issues.



Wasn't it mousey who said that?

Wasn't it mousey who said that

Wake me up when you realize that you're putting other posters' words in my mouth. Jesus tap-danciing Christ, pay attention.

Prof. people have on this thread posted proof enough for a big part of the scientific community, and invited you to say something rather thatn its not true, tell us why none of the books Drnizer posted are proof enough?

Nap time is over, Name one and back it up?

This is getting ridiculous. Zoroastrianism is, of course, a religion. However, Prof. Chaos can't back that up so... C'mon professor, you're making us give evidence for our much more relevent and undemiable claims- do the same with yours!!!

BTW, your ignorance is becoming more and more evident. Rejecting all other religions is not the basis of the Christian faith;

also, no one truly aquanted with Christianity would use the words Jesus/Jehova. First of all, since you like "facts", 'Jehova' is just a mispronunciation of 'Yaweh'- 'I am'. Secondly, they are two separate entities. You make them seem interchangeable, but they are not. They, along with the Holy Spirit are, at least for most Christians, the three parts of the Holy Trinity, the one Godhead, if you will.

This is ridiculous, indeed. Your ignorance is overwhelming. What in the world am I supposed to back up, lol. Freaking idiots. Zoroastrianism exists. If your puny little minds don't know about it, that's not my problem. What am I supposed to "back up?"

But of course it is, moron. Did God say, "I am one of many gods?" Of course not. What's the first freaking commandment?

LOL! So which is it, a "mispronunciation" or a "separate entity"?

Hey, guess, what! Everyone can say that! "If your puny little mind doesn't know the commonly accepted fact that Padre Pio had stigmata, I really can't help that. So, I guess I'll forsake any attempt to argue further or use proof."
I guess that argument is settled.

Wow, moron. You are evil. Of course you're totally right. I forgot that specific minor details defined the things they are part of. Also, no one here has ever shown you such a high level of disrespect to you here. We all have attempted to be somewhat cordial.

You have an amazing inability to interpret things. Everything past the second sentence refers to Jehovah/Jesus, not the fat that Jehova is a mispronunciation, and it's not a contrdictory statement.

My apologies, what are you, 10? I'll try to speak more simple-like fo' ya.

Zoroastrianism is a religion that exists, with hundreds of thousands of followers. You don't need to prove that something exists.

Your boy's "stigmata" is a supernatural event witnessed by nobody. See the difference, numbskull?

This is beyond laughable. There's about two or three "cordial" people here. You ain't one of 'em.

Right. I should have known to ignore the first point of your argument, and only listened to the second one. LOL!

History of Israel -by J. Bright
Jesus and the constraints of History- by A. Harvey
Revitalization Movements - by A.F.C. Wallace
The Quest of the Historical Jesus - By Albert Schweitzer

Your boy's "stigmata" is a supernatural event witnessed by nobody. See the difference, numbskull?

Beginning in August 1918 and over the course of several weeks, Padre Pio developed permanent, painful stigmata that bled intermittently for the next 50 years and disappeared only a few days before his death. The experience began on August 5 when he claimed to observe a vision of a fiery spear being hurled at his chest. He suffered excruciating pain for two days, resulting in a chest laceration. A few weeks later, in September, a similar incident left him with permanent wounds on his hands and feet. A series of doctors examined the wounds of Padre Pio and verified the existence of the condition, but left no written comment or explanation. Luigi Romanelli, chief physician of the City Hospital of Barletta, examined the priest's wounds five times over the course of one year. Dr. Giorgio Festa, a private practitioner, viewed them in 1920 and again in 1925. Professor Giuseppe Bastianelli, physician to Pope Benedict XV agreed that the wounds indeed existed but made no other comment. Angelo Maria Merla of San Giovanni Rotondo noted that the wounds were not tubercular in origin, but made no diagnosis; nor did pathologist, Dr. Amico Bignami of the University of Rome. The wounds bled severely at times, although medical examiners reported no fever, nor anemia or change of blood pressure associated with the condition. According to witnesses the wounds of Padre Pio emitted a distinctively fragrant odor, and all other abrasions to Padre Pio's body healed normally during those years, including an incision to repair a hernia.

Name one what and back it up with what? Stop sniffing glue and try to make some sense.

Why don't you answer the original question: Do you deny that Mazda is the one true god?

Zurvan
by Micha F. Lindemans
"The primordial god in Persian religion, and the god of infinite time and space. Zurvan is the father of the good god Ahura Mazda and the evil god Angra Mainyu.
He had to make sacrifices for 1,000 years to get them because he is androgynous. With children representing the two opposites, Zurvan himself is regarded as a neutral god; one for whom there is no distinction between good or evil. Zurvan is also the god of destiny, light and darkness. In Zurvanism, the state religion of the Sassanides in the 3rd-7th century CE, Zurvan is the highest god and lord of the four elements.

Zoroastrianism
The ancient pre-Islamic religion of Iran, still present there in isolated areas. There is a greater group of followers in India, the descendants of Zoroastrian Iranian (Persian) immigrants, known as Parsis, or Parsees. In India the religion is called Parsiism. Founded by the Iranian prophet and reformer Zoroaster in the 6th century BCE, the religion contains both monotheistic and dualistic elements.