The Bush Family

Right because the 'enemy' has armored Hummers, Abram and Challenger 2 tanks equipped with Depleted Uranium rounds (wow... nuclear warfare... no wonder theres so many soldiers coming back with respiratory problems... along with 100,000s of Iraqis and Afghans) Apache helicopters, F16, Tornado's... yeah sure... man it's so unjust the 'enemy' fights back... really, I mean geeez... it really is uncalled for when citizens of a country defend it.

NO WHERE did I say the enemy couldn't fight back. I mean did you even read my post? My post was about the Geneva Convention... you know the one we have to follow but our enemy doesn't.

So I say again.... we will follow the Geneva Convention when they do!

They can fight how they wish. If they want to come out and fight dirty so we will. Why should we have to play nice? Answer that.

Your argument technically makes sense and I am honored that you are comparing my crimes to the war crimes of your leader on the very same level, however this argument is like drowning men grasping at straws, does not nullify what I say and is unconstructive.

does not nullify what I say and is unconstructive.

You folks scream war crimes committed by the highest people in our government. I say, show me some cold hard, solid proof. Wait, I am talking to a liberal here, never mind. I forgot that proof isn't the liberal dictionary. Never mind, continue with your left wing ramblings and conspiracy theories.

Hey I'm not going to run around after you, the "cold hard, solid proof" is out there, I have nothing to prove to you, but you have everything to prove to yourself. Just for the record I am not a liberal.



Right because the 'enemy' has armored Hummers, Abram and Challenger 2 tanks equipped with Depleted Uranium rounds (wow... nuclear warfare... no wonder theres so many soldiers coming back with respiratory problems... along with 100,000s of Iraqis and Afghans) Apache helicopters, F16, Tornado's... yeah sure... man it's so unjust the 'enemy' fights back... really, I mean geeez... it really is uncalled for when citizens of a country defend it.

Hey I'm not going to run around after you, the "cold hard, solid proof" is out there, I have nothing to prove to you, but you have everything to prove to yourself. Just for the record I am not a liberal.

the "cold hard, solid proof" is out there

Right because the 'enemy' has armored Hummers, Abram and Challenger 2 tanks equipped with Depleted Uranium rounds (wow... nuclear warfare... no wonder theres so many soldiers coming back with respiratory problems... along with 100,000s of Iraqis and Afghans) Apache helicopters, F16, Tornado's... yeah sure... man it's so unjust the 'enemy' fights back... really, I mean geeez... it really is uncalled for when citizens of a country defend it.

I heard some moonbat say "We should not fight dirty because the U.S is better than that..we have a reputation to uphold" Needless to say she was an idiot.
If she ever gets sexually assaulted, she should just lie there lest anyone think she is a troublemaker by screaming.

You have yet to anser the question?

Not even for the honor of your wife? What about your kids. I'm one to almost always try and talk about it before aggression starts but such situations are not always possible. We are barely hairless apes, and being so are prone to fight for what ever reason we feel just.

You should argue with a little more logic and alot less emotion.

Answer what question? Sorry it's just you're ranting on about my weed smoking when it has so little relevance to the actual topic I started... unless your going to bring up the fact I smoke weed as an argument every time I speak of criminal activity to somehow... well I don't know... what actually is your point? I smoke weed... therefore I break the law... therefore I can't talk... I just don't figure. Besides I live in England where by I can have a small amount of cannabis without being arrested.





Wow... how ironic could one be.

You folks scream war crimes committed by the highest people in our government. I say, show me some cold hard, solid proof. Wait, I am talking to a liberal here, never mind. I forgot that proof isn't the liberal dictionary. Never mind, continue with your left wing ramblings and conspiracy theories.

Answer what question? Sorry it's just you're ranting on about my weed smoking when it has so little relevance to the actual topic I started... unless your going to bring up the fact I smoke weed as an argument every time I speak of criminal activity to somehow... well I don't know... what actually is your point? I smoke weed... therefore I break the law... therefore I can't talk... I just don't figure. Besides I live in England where by I can have a small amount of cannabis without being arrested.





Wow... how ironic could one be.

Answer what question?

Sorry it's just you're ranting on about my weed smoking when it has so little relevance to the actual topic I started...

unless your going to bring up the fact I smoke weed as an argument every time I speak of criminal activity to somehow...

what actually is your point? I smoke weed... therefore I break the law... therefore I can't talk... I just don't figure. Besides I live in England where by I can have a small amount of cannabis without being arrested.

Some of us wouldn't see a problem with it.

proof, from the "conservative" dictionary: "what I believe is the truth."
see influenced by Fox News Corp.

proof, from the "liberal" dictionary: an assertion able to proved by documentation,
the scientific method of investigation or fact.

Waterboarding is torture, and thus a warcrime. If it isn't torture, then we need
to stop branding the Kh'mer Rouge as such dirty bastards. Obviously, they
were just like us, and were probably good guys.

Bush and Co. just hammered away at changing the "definition" of torture.
How liberal of them, redifining words for their own ends.

Waterboarding is torture, and thus a warcrime.

Bush and Co. just hammered away at changing the "definition" of torture.
How liberal of them, redifining words for their own ends.[/[/quote]
Buch and Co finally go a little liberal and you get all in a tizzy. I would think you'd be happy, LOL. Don't like it when they redefine but it ok when Libbys do it, how hipocritical of you!

Drnaline... to put it rather bluntly I have no time for you and your righteousness. So save yourself the time and bother of replying to anything I say here out if it has little to do with the ACTUAL topic and isn't some 'neo-con' bullshit.

Not even for the honor of your wife? What about your kids. I'm one to almost always try and talk about it before aggression starts but such situations are not always possible. We are barely hairless apes, and being so are prone to fight for what ever reason we feel just.

Got link? We'll see who's definition it falls under? If it is a crime then all you have to do is prove we did it to some one but you will need a little more then hearsay.

Buch and Co finally go a little liberal and you get all in a tizzy. I would think you'd be happy, LOL. Don't like it when they redefine but it ok when Libbys do it, how hipocritical of you!

A little Darwinism slipping in there, Drnaline? Yes, we are animals, but
evolved animals, capable of reason.

We do have to be better... sorry, but it's true.