Voter Fraud: More Than 1,000 Voter Cards Suspect

Any convictions?

And our Supreme Court decided what about the whole deal?

You didn't ask for that. Nice attempt at a changeup, though. You asked for evidence towards erroneous voter disenfranchisement. That was supplied. Now you move the goalposts. That is a clear sign that you have no ground to stand on. But we knew that already.

Thats the problem,nothing was done ! the country that likies to preach about democracy to others,done nothing about an election being stolen,anyone with half a brain knows what went on in florida. :thumbdown:

So your answer is no, no convictions. Easy enough.

If your tired, put the goal post down.

Nope, yours. I suppose you think you never do it? That's gotta be one of your favorite tacktics.

Actually Sanchez... if you like convictions so much, then explain to me why Diebold hired five convicted felons to handle the voting machines.

Con Job at Diebold Subsidiary

Now one of the guys was convicted on 23 felony counts of, catch this, planting back doors in his software and using what the courts called "a high degree of sophistication" to evade detection.

So, care to spin this?

No spin - I think he should spend 20 in a federal penitentiary. If you are looking for corruption, look no farther than your senate and congress. It's loaded with thieves and liars.

No spin - I think he should spend 20 in a federal penitentiary. If you are looking for corruption, look no farther than your senate and congress. It's loaded with thieves and liars.

It does NOT matter how much time you're looking for... the fact remains that a man with TWENTY-THREE felonies of none other than exploits through backdoors and covering it up, should not be allowed within a square MILE of Diebold, much less employed by them. You know he didn't get a background check, there's no way that didn't raise a red flag somewhere. Seriously, *I* couldn't get that close if I wanted to, and I have no convictions! Who the hell is not doing their job?!

That stinks to high hell, dude. You have to agree with that.

Absolutely. Further, he should be subject to public ridicule in the proverbial town square prior to sentencing.

I don't care what you do with him. Explain to me why he was not only given a job at this company, but allowed access to the voting machines.

It's not for me to explain. Suffice to say, I would never have hired someone for a position this important without a thorough background examination.

In all my years of management I have learned that just because someone interviews well it does not mean they will perform well. Before I ever meet them personally, I have done all my background work.