1
   

Poll: Can Gays & Lesbians alter their sexual orientation?

 
 
rufio
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 09:52 pm
"The purpose of sodomy is enslavement. It is evil."

Says who?

"Think back to when you were a child. Would sodomy have appeared beautiful to you? I think not. It is disgusting."

Sex in general, asparagus, the color red, and numerous other things seemed disgusting to me as a kid. That doesn't make them evil.

"Really, is there anything more disgusting?"

Asparagus, definitely. Smile
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 09:54 pm
asparagus, the colour pink, and the Powerpuff Girls are most definitely evil!
0 Replies
 
rufio
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 09:56 pm
Oh, good point. But still. Smile I thought coffee was gross, too, and coffee is God.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:04 pm
Coffee is the eighth foodgroup! Its just behind Chocolate, Guiness, and Habanero peppers. Semen is furhter down in the high eighties. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
rufio
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:07 pm
Oh come on. Cheese has got to be at least 85-90.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:10 pm
Brie, Swiss, Muenster and sharp, golden cheddar are just after Coffee. At the very bottom of the list Ramen Noodles sit crying because no-one likes them. Razz
0 Replies
 
rufio
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Nov, 2003 10:23 pm
It must have the asparagus for company though.

Gouda and Groier (sp?) are great too.

Cherry coke, ranch pringles, peanuts, pecans, ice cream, chicken salad - all come just after the peppers I think. Lol, I think that's what I live on now.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 09:00 am
Re: Can homosexuality be changed.
I concur with everything you wrote, hobitbob, except for this:
hobitbob wrote:
Never begin a sentence a preposition with!

You're not serious, are you? When did that become a rule?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 05:52 pm
Without doubt, an egregiously erroneous statement. Where does it say one can't begin a sentence with a preposition? For years, I've been doing it.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 05:55 pm
I see I need to start inserting smiley faces for the humour impaired. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 06:05 pm
hobit, read M.A.'s lovely grammatical expressions of pique...
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 09:17 pm
It has been ruled somewhere within my purview that ending a sentence with a preposition is okay, yes, yes, it is somewhere on some a2k topic, and re starting one with, don't we all do that?
I forget who it was that started that, re starting that, but he was kidding. But then you all know that. I just have to post this little bit to myself.
okay.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 09:18 pm
Ok, I just edited. I first typed, by mistake, ending a sentence with a proposition.

M'culpa.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 09:20 pm
Is it here I can finally ask someone what egregious means?

I see it all the time and bat it back and forth myself. Is it gratuitous? Overweening? emm?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 10:26 pm
egeregious (adj.)
Conspicuously bad or offensive. See Synonyms at flagrant.
[From Latin gregius, outstanding : -, ex-, ex- + grex, greg-, herd; see ger- in Indo-European roots.]

e·gregious·ly adv.
e·gregious·ness n.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Nov, 2003 11:46 pm
flagrant? An egregious use of power... well, yes, I guess flagrant makes sense.

I have some inthebackofmyneck sense of 'throwaway', but that doesn't usually fit with the contexts I see. I suppose I could look it up, but I'd rather surmise.
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Nov, 2003 03:07 pm
Have we all detoured to prepositions on our way to hell? Do you think? We have?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Nov, 2003 06:16 pm
truth
Nobody's home. I see Step314 is still addicted to his/her theory of seminal addiction. By the way people who enjoy using the term, SODOMY, are the moral equivalents of those who like to use the term, FORNICATION, regarding heterosexual sex. I sense the same spirit behind both usages.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Nov, 2003 07:03 pm
Um, antique language addiction? Welcome home, nobody!
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Nov, 2003 10:09 pm
truth
Thanks, Osso.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 12:13:58