DOES NOTHING EXIST???

guigus wrote:

In practice, none of us can have a full-blown experience of being, including each and all being, just like none of us can have a full-blown experience of nothing, excluding each and all being. By which being and nothingness are, in practice, the same.

You have forgotten what you already know or you are outright lying about knowing it. Just because you haven't had a "full-blown experience of 'Be'-ing" doesn't mean that "none of us can have a full-blown experience of 'Be'-ing". More accurately said, "A full-blown experience of 'Be'-ing-there".

It is truly imbecilic of you to propose that you are the 'litmus test' for the rest of us on the planet. That statement you made let's the rest of us know not to put too much stock in what you have to say.

Thanks for the warning.

I think he's getting ready to pull out a straw from his back pocket to spit that right back at you..................DUCK!!!

Thank you very much!

Well, I don't know if you realize what you have just agreed with, so let me call your attention to the fact that this has huge implications. The first question that arises from this is: how can be nothing be everything that exists? How can this be, without also destroying everything? And it is only when you seriously ask yourself that question that things begin to get really interesting.

guigus wrote:

Thank you very much!

Well, I don't know if you realize what you have just agreed with, so let me call your attention to the fact that this has huge implications. The first question that arises from this is: how can be nothing be everything that exists? How can this be, without also destroying everything? And it is only when you seriously ask yourself that question that things begin to get really interesting.

Sorry for my late response, I'm not certain as to how nothing can be everything with destroying everything, unless you destroy the ontological concepts about everything. I'm not certain if that would count towards the destruction of everything since it's just the negation of the concepts around them. With this state of negation, however, everything can become anything.

The Self, or more accurately said, 'Self' is an un-covering of itself. You know this and it is an issue for 'projecting' it 'there'.

There is no 'thing', not 'nothing'.

The problem your having is that you go through life by merely 'maintaining' your 'self' through a serious of explanations instead of Be-ing your very 'self'.

You look at 'nothing' as some sort of concept to be proven or disproven, when in fact it was just 'created' to cover over Be-ing as an explanation.

No one is ever going to be able to provide you with the definition you seek, as Dasein has said, you merely have forgotten what you already know and are trying to prove something to cover it up.

I do not believe that 'Heidegger'(some mans name) was actually asking a question when he says 'Why is there something rather than nothing'?

He is trying to get you to 'think' for your 'self'.

Also, you're 'listening' seems to be off in your posts. You are not authentically hearing what I have to say but are 'taking me' as some 'thing' to be 'understood'(prove or disprove the existence of).

In case you didn't know(you do) everything you read is a reflection of you, Be-ing.

This 'thing' you are trying to prove/disprove simply doesn't exist.

Guigus; You're still a righteous, argumentative fool, however, the only one you're fooling is you.

Good luck with that. As I said in an earlier post, I don't put ANY validity into what you have to say, which is why I put you on 'ignore'.

doesnt something exist???
if something doesnt exist, then nothing is all there is...

Jesus!

Why is it that people like you are so quick to deny their 'self' a chance to 'think' by just randomly posting a conclusion that pops into their head??

Doesn't the 'dullness' of your statement bother you even a little bit? Did you actually read it while you typed it or after you posted it??

You post depicts perfectly that of someone who not only doesn't know what they're talking about, but thinks he can lie about it. Stop attempting to fool your 'self' with witless, thoughtless remarks and then 'feed off' your responses merely because you were taken seriously.

The unwritten rule in life is:

I won't call you out on your bullshit if you don't call me out on mine.

It's better to be a righteous, argumentative fool

guigus wrote:

It's better to be a righteous, argumentative fool

You have already given us enough evidence for the fact that "It's better to be a righteous, argumentative fool" isn't true.

You got your job done with all of us.

You don't have to go on proving it.

guigus wrote:

It's better to be a righteous, argumentative fool

You have already given us enough evidence for the fact that "It's better to be a righteous, argumentative fool" isn't true.

You got your job done with all of us.

You don't have to go on proving it.