@Ali phil,
Ali;157018 wrote:I've heard many causes of sexuality, one being that the woman can produce more of a chemical in the womb which gives the child for femininity. I've also heard the wacky, that eating tinned pineapple exposes you to a chemacal which can also cause you to be more feminin, not too sure about that :/
Would be interested on your opinions even more on the facts you could come up with please post (:
Hello Ali you bring up a very touchy subject and an extremely "sticky" one. If you don't mind, solely an opinion, I will address the title of your initial query, I will offer my thoughts as they are now.
I don't know about a chemical in the womb, but you can bet what that child is "exposed" to in the womb has something to do with it. We don't know and we don't remember what life was like there and it can be said life sure as hell could be better there. Having a loving father present for a child to hear and a loving mother and her voice and everything else involve with that time has everything to do with it. And it's about harmony, serenity and comfort in those surroundings and what that child "senses" from "his/her" "creators". The Mother and the Father created those conditions that allowed that new life to form. Always remember when you envision the creation of life the similarities of a "long tailed" extraterrestrial entity penetrating the Earth as a "long tailed" sperm penetrating the egg!!!!!! They are identical.
What life is like there afterward those two "impregnations" are identical.
What the earth does is mirrored in what the WE do. For the time being, let's just leave it there.
A child (those little things that matter) cannot be created any other way and god help us if we ever find a way to circumvent that universal truth. What a universal "lie" that would be. We don't understand all that is that is that child or new creation. We think WE created that child, just as God created the Earth and it is indeed "NEW" when it is not. It is just a part of a universal continuum and an extremely important part of that continuum; we will not continue without it. Now when I say "IT", imagine "IT" is God, and he is "IT", he's been "tagged", ha, it's his turn. The thing is, is you don't tag him, he tags you, ha! More later on this. It is rapturous! Hmmm! You'll know when he is doing that, they are called "chill bumps" as I have offered in another thread about "IT" and what it is.
Now back to the subject at hand.
If that child is disturb in that rather helpless state in the womb, there will be consequences that will plague that child for the rest of his life. One thing that child needs is the feel and sounds of contentment from both those responsible for his being. BOTH!!!!!!!
Ha, had I known at that state of my life the situation of the world, you couldn't have pried me out with a crowbar, ha! I have always wondered how it would have changed my life had it been practiced what I, what you might call, preach today?
Same sex sexuality is about dominance/competitiveness, misunderstood desire/wants, and the master/slave reality we are now living in and have always lived in; or survived in might be a better way of saying it. When we fully understand the man/woman universal paradigm that brings life into this world, it will not only eliminate homosexuality but a hell of a lot of other problems created from those misunderstandings.
Now let's go back to the ancients; in particular the Greeks will do for the time being and the word "Oikos"; house/household/family and what that meant and what it is supposed to mean and man's culpability in his assumptions or his supreme autonomy. That assumption is what is wrong and why all the strife, bloodshed. Not giving woman the recognition she certainly deserves. Just like the Earth. We, man, rape and pillage "her" too.
It is the same as a city, state, nation and the Earth. Our house, our family that begins with a man and a woman in harmony that bring life into this world. Without a man and a woman there would be no life in that world or rather than man or woman we can say male and female and the union of the two. That's why I say it is universal; there are NO other alternatives. The sperm uniting with the egg. That's when life continues. Not begins; we don't know when that started or how long ago it was that started.
By misunderstanding the relationship between man and woman would cause a decay in the city/state/nation/world. Or THE END. There is no life whatsoever that can ever come from homosexuality. NONE. It decays life. Homosexuality is but one of the man-infestions, there are many more than that because of his "assumed autonomous dominance". It can lead to sado-masochistic (self punishment). Man punishes man and sodomy does "HURT" and so do wars. Ever thought about when we experience pain in one of those "pointing fingers" the first thing we to is put it into our mouth and "suck on it", ha! "Suck it up, be a man!" Yeah, right, hmmm?
I have given this much thought an it all comes down to rather than heterosexuals being afraid of gay men, it is more reasonable to conclude that anyone who has a fear, it is that of a man of a woman when there is a very strong male influence assumed by those women in his formative, early years or there is no male influence what so ever or a very weak one if there is one at all. Not "macho", that's bad too. It's all about dominance/master/slave and all that truly does SUCK. Pardon the pun. Man will revert back to his infant state and suck on anything and a good indication of this is when they begin sucking on their own thumb. Girls will do that to when exposed to the same conditions. Domination by either is a no win proposition.
In a single parent scenario when one of the biological "creators" is missing or in a role that juxtaposes those innate roles into one, the child will subsequently try and "fix it" in such a way that makes sense to "that child". It is a lack and causes a depravity. These 'fixes' can cause all sorts of scenarios, homosexuality is just one of them.
When a young boy does not receive the nurturing and care from a male in his very young years, he will always seek that. He needs both, this "mother and Father" and the love from both and I don't mean "sexually". Dare I mention it, could it be love?
The mother is the girls role model and the father is the boys and when boys and girls get the love and attention from both in those early stages of life, homosexuality would have never existed. One sex dominance sucks in all scenarios. Men will try to prove they are men willing to go to war to prove it. Misunderstanding the male/female universal paradigm is primarily man's fault not woman's. Each will do what they have to do to survive and the exchanging of their innate roles is by far the most depraved and only makes it worse. Thank god there is, for the most part, an understanding of the "family" and what IT should be.
When a Mother is the dominate figure in a young boys life, she becomes "his role model", period. He will follow her lead and try to emulate her. That's not hard to understand; he wants to be like her so he will not get into trouble and what some women cater to them. Fathers who are in a more submissive role has the same effect. The boy will follow the role of the stronger of the two. These men were boys who where "afraid" of their mothers. And on the same token, those boys who are afraid of their fathers create problems too.
This misunderstanding goes back thousands of years into antiquity and it's always been wrong! Now universally that can be said to be just yesterday as it pertains to just how far 'we' do go back. It could be we have destroyed ourselves before, let's hope we don't do it again.
Now let's go back to "IT". Man will effort to prove his masculinity or that god in him, that life, that sperm, that life in him that is IT. that life that brings life to woman and he shouldn't have to as indicated by those extremes; war being the worst. A sado-masochistic punishment of US causing a lot of innocents to perish. Yep, man has created a whole bunch of problems and it started with his misunderstanding of woman. Haven't you ever heard it's "not nice to fool with "Mother Nature". If we only knew, in all respects, as it pertains to the heavens and the earth. Hmmm! IT would be something, wouldn't IT. Something is surely better than nothing, isn't IT. IT IS.
Let me say sexual expression in the public domain should only be that of the universal paradigm of a man and woman and limited to small expressions such as holding hands, the arm around the waist and peck on the cheek. I will not argue, that is to be allowed. Many will offer that this is an infringement of an expression of freedom of speech for other "sexual lifestyles", and that, to me, is a crock of sh*t. Pardon that expression, please.
That means all that is considered the public domain and that's a lot. Sexual expressions that are any more than that should remain private in one's private domain and that is where they should stay. That is no one else's "affair" unless what goes on there ventures into public domain, then it becomes all our affair. There is entirely too much to consider regarding what should be public and what should be private to elaborate more here. There should be no conflict in either, but that is not what IT is at the moment.
Let me offer that I feel it is a lot more than what is biological and what is circumstantial. The word itself means definitively "one sex" which means an alienation of the other of the two universal paradigms. What causes this alienation can be any number of things; but before we will ever know that we must effort to understand that male/female universal paradigm. If we do eventually understand that, homosexuality will in and of itself...............begone along with all the other "things" created by such an autonomous man including war. To imagine those consequences is much to horrible to imagine what they might be if WE don't effort to understand collectively what that universal paradigm represents and all that IT IS.
William