@Reconstructo,
Reconstructo;113101 wrote: but where does this man come from himself? So that's the God behind man's gods, and yet the human mind is presumably limited in its ability to contemplate this Ground of Being.
Man comes from itself, we learn by our own experience, God teaches nothing but example, do as God does which is very little, man meaning is its own, man gives meaning and reason to and for itself, even through religious doctrinations we need to learn by man own understanding of mans transgressions/progressions. The Bible and all religious works/scriptures is all man by man for man to learn.
But we must also recognise in us that we dont just listen to the person warning of the heat of fire, we have to reach out and touch it ourselves, the Bible and othe works/scripture just put in place the execises that we still (most do) have to experience learn oursleves, wisdom can only be atained through lesson and touch, the experiment the result, and we can only test ourselves.
Do not test thee God
Do not put thee God to the test.
You will fail.
Man can only reason (mans own construct i suspect) Gods example by acting as example to itself and by turning God into a person so that man can in some way relate/equate the reason/trial we put ourselves through, not necessarily God doing the testing.
Reconstructo;113101 wrote:
See, the God I think can do something for folks is also what I call the meta-ideal. I think it's a Jungian archetype sort-o-thing that functions in all of us. It's just my theory but I think our self-esteem is tied up with this spiritual itch/drive/instinct that leads up upward, urges us to evolve. But of course Love and Life and the rest are all tangled up with this. This meta-ideal is like the ideal self we try to live up to. It's our concept of what a beautiful noble human is. I'm still looking for the best phrases to put this idea in.
Keep working looking and giving, what you are doing is fine work.
But i know what you mean about making something beautiful so as to be regarded as more than words and as something someone might find meaning and understanding and contemplation from through a very satisfying medium/example such is beauty.
If it is beautiful we are more likely/want to believe it is true.
We often hear/listen more to what we find pleasing to the ear/mind.
Beautiful is a noble truth and more likely to be pandered to.
Who says you cant pander to truth?
Keep strumming away, you will find the right cord/chord.
Reconstructo;113101 wrote:
I enjoyed your post. (I'm sober now, and wasn't ashamed but indulgent. Also had read Burgess on Joyce and that got out of control...Fun times, though....decides to let loose a bit0
The 'shame' was all mine, i tend towards talking to myself, not 'you', 'my own' or 'ones own', i would never dare to presume anothers shame for me or for them, sorry if i did this even inadvertantly.
(pleased better off to hear your loose side, i just got to learn to hear better)