edgarblythe wrote:The man has been a first class jerk for years. Naturally, my first thought was, "This guy is apparently guilty of the very thing he accuses others of." Of course I was happy to see such a guy shut down by his own failings. Gloating I am not. Not when it involves harm to a child.
I suppose it reveals my petty nature, but I can't seem to ignore your repeated attempts to say one thing, and then explain it as something else.
Here is your original post:
"After years on KSEV, a Tomball/Houston radio station, castigating liberals on their morals, conservative talk show host John Matthews has resigned. Cause: He was indicted on a charge of exposing himself and seeking sexual gratification before a girl younger than seventeen. He has vowed to fight the charge. It is but one more example that it makes no difference the political orientation; people will be imperfect. While it gives me a great deal of personal satisfaction to see this particular person fall, I do not ascribe his alleged behavior to his spouting off like Rush Limbaugh all the time. "
If there is a sentiment for the plight of the girl in the above, I'm afraid I missed it.
You took some care to indicate that you did not make a direct connection between this miscreant's behavior and his politics, but you made no secret of your gloating.
Your
5th post read as follows:
"It may have looked like I was gloating in earlier posts. I would prefer that he be back on the radio telling folks how low people like me are than to have him or anyone be guilty of such a crime. Anyway, justice will be served."
Your
9th post was
"Eventually getting to the girl is your interpretation. The negative is ascribed automatically in the minds of antagonists."
If you insist on claiming you considered the poor girl's situation from the start, so be it.
You might come across more credible, though, if you acknowledged that your first reaction was to gloat. There's nothing all that wrong with gloating, particularly if you
eventually recognized that a real human being was involved in the circumstances, but your insistence otherwise rings quite false.
A minor issue in the larger scheme of things.