Rise of the Militias

Climate Rescue Weblog: Will the real ClimateGate please stand up? (part 2)

various calls for unlawful conduct are in the news, and militias have risen in number recently

So whats your point? you are obviously intent on making one

Emerging battle-bruised from the disaster zone of Copenhagen, but ever-hopeful, a rider on horseback brought news of darkness and light: "The politicians have failed. Now it's up to us. We must break the law to make the laws we need: laws that are supposed to protect society, and protect our future. Until our laws do that, screw being climate lobbyists. Screw being climate activists. It's not working. We need an army of climate outlaws."

If you're one of those who have spent their lives undermining progressive climate legislation..[EDIT:tra la la la la...tossed salad /EDIT]...fueling spurious debates around false solutions....[EDIT: skipped the slobbering /EDIT]then hear this:
We know who you are. We know where you live. We know where you work.
And we be many, but you be few.

Greenpeacers must typically use more fuel than I do. They should jail themselves.

Ide rather be a green peace warrior than an ostrich with his head up his back side. Dont you think governments use violence to maintain their views.

When its obvious the world is being destroyed by self centred deniers, whose the evil doer?

Oil companies and their stooges are intent on making this a propaganda war with no holds barred , so bring it on.

Ide rather be a green peace warrior than an ostrich with his head up his back side. Dont you think governments use violence to maintain their views. When its obvious the world is being destroyed by self centred deniers, whose the evil doer? Oil companies and their stooges are intent on making this a propaganda war with no holds barred , so bring it on.

Of course. Does that give Greenpeace the entitlement to incite unlawful attacks on persons ?
If the deniers are few, then the world is not being destroyed by their CO2 footprint, as is suggested by the rant. the "Deniers" label is for "CO2-driven warming disaster" deniers, is it not ? If they are a vast majority, then perhaps is it that you are indeed advocating that the few unlawfully attack the many ?

well, sure, oil companies have a strong interest, and legal propagandizing is a time- honoured activity. What has this to do with supposed entitlement of Militias to incite unlawful activities against persons ?

I think it is pretty obvious that people in distant Canada, Alaska and the lower 48 have a greater contempt for nature the more they have of it... Some times even the natives feel so, crapping on what has been stolen from them... As I suppose we all might if such a thing as nature were possible to steal... People who destroy nature destroy themselves...IT is us...

Of course. Does that give Greenpeace the entitlement to incite unlawful attacks on persons ?
If the deniers are few, then the world is not being destroyed by their CO2 footprint, as is suggested by the rant. the "Deniers" label is for "CO2-driven warming disaster" deniers, is it not ? If they are a vast majority, then perhaps is it that you are indeed advocating that the few unlawfully attack the many ?

well, sure, oil companies have a strong interest, and legal propagandizing is a time- honoured activity. What has this to do with supposed entitlement of Militias to incite unlawful activities against persons ?

... You carry on with your blatant propaganda but you may notice for the most part your ignored and treated as the stooge you are. I know that your one of many paid to spread disinformation and lies. Your single minded activity is obvious.

you have been reported.

I never shy from the truth, not like you. Your trolling has been obvious for weeks.

It seems as though many groups are garnering support, and making noises about, the eventual take-over of civil government by the followers, a foreseen event they seem to relish.

Whats your purpose here, to be listened to , agreed with? This constant posting of links that support your blinkered view, is for what? Dont you understand it means absolutely nothing, when the evidence for global warming is overwhelming. So you want to point to those who wish to be active against government inactivity..so is this any reason why I should change my mind? I could understand if you had other interests but your constant preaching and trolling is annoying..You cant even be ignored.

I do not ask you to change your mind. You might reply to specific charges or points raised, in accordance with forum rules, if you liked. but that is not under my control.

It is obvious your intention this time is to associate green peace with some religious nutters, as if this will tarnish their name. I will ask you again what is your purpose in posting here on one constant thread? It cant be to involve yourself in meaningful debate , can it? link after meaningless link, even when no one takes notice of you.

Once they go into inciting the raising of an unlawfully acting Militia, it is not me that is putting them in the same class.
I do hope that you might begin to differentiate between my disagreement with, or my contradiction of, your posts, and something that might entitle you to perform an ongoing ad hominem assault in return. That's all the time I will devote to the ad hom offerings.

Would you like to tell us how you feel about Militias attacking unarmed persons, in general ? Attacking police during the routine carrying out of duties ?