0
   

We'll Never Be Happy Consumers Again -- No Stimulus Package Can Bring That Back

 
 
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2009 06:25 am
@Theaetetus,
thanks..........I remember Gene Pitney out of my distant past; but why???
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2009 08:20 am
@Fido,
Fido wrote:
thanks..........I remember Gene Pitney out of my distant past; but why???

Pretty good singer back in the fifties and sixties. Had a few hits. not many. Town without pity was one.
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2009 08:36 am
@Elmud,
Elmud wrote:
Pretty good singer back in the fifties and sixties. Had a few hits. not many. Town without pity was one.

Hey;...I was born in the fifties...No; wait....I was born in a hospital.... I was raised in the fifties...We... Had hoola hoops... They would have been great if everyone did them naked...Fantasitic if only pretty girls did... We... Had radios too... Not much on them worth listening too... A whole lot more talent today and a lot less market per....
Mr Fight the Power
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2009 09:09 am
@Theaetetus,
Theaetetus wrote:
I don't understand why growth in consumption is considered a good thing or even a desirable thing. Unless, consumers start buying things that are intended to last lifetimes, or at least efficient to recycle with very little waste, there is no way that growth in consumption can be sustainable, much less good.


Consumption can be linked to quality of life, and, as I noted, an increase in the consumption of final goods need not be linked to an increase in consumption of natural resources. Constant growth can be supported by education, creativity, and technology.
Elmud
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2009 09:28 am
@Fido,
Fido wrote:
Hey;...I was born in the fifties...No; wait....I was born in a hospital.... I was raised in the fifties...We... Had hoola hoops... They would have been great if everyone did them naked...Fantasitic if only pretty girls did... We... Had radios too... Not much on them worth listening too... A whole lot more talent today and a lot less market per....

Its refreshing to see someone break away temporarily from the intellectual side of things and throw a little humor in there. Thanks Mr. Fidoski.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Feb, 2009 10:55 am
@Mr Fight the Power,
Mr. Fight the Power wrote:
Consumption can be linked to quality of life, and, as I noted, an increase in the consumption of final goods need not be linked to an increase in consumption of natural resources. Constant growth can be supported by education, creativity, and technology.
You wont stop hammering us with this constant demand for more is good thing..How can you associate consumption with quality of life are you in marketing? How long do you think the worlds gas supplies are going to last or how long do you think oil will be flowing? 15 years for gas is the estimate and 30 years for oil..WOT in hell are we going to do then with this great thing growth then???
Mr Fight the Power
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Feb, 2009 12:17 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
You wont stop hammering us with this constant demand for more is good thing..How can you associate consumption with quality of life are you in marketing? How long do you think the worlds gas supplies are going to last or how long do you think oil will be flowing? 15 years for gas is the estimate and 30 years for oil..WOT in hell are we going to do then with this great thing growth then???


I said growth in consumption can be linked to improved quality of life.

Unlike you, I am not convinced that growth can be judged absolutely.

Is growth in the consumption of nonrenewable energy use beneficial? No.

Is growth in the consumption of basic health care beneficial? Yes.

Ultimately, people who wish to provide absolute judgment on when and how we should grow or shrink in consumption is more dangerous than unrestrained (by law) growth.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Feb, 2009 01:03 pm
@Mr Fight the Power,
Mr. Fight the Power wrote:
I said growth in consumption can be linked to improved quality of life.

Unlike you, I am not convinced that growth can be judged absolutely.

Is growth in the consumption of nonrenewable energy use beneficial? No.

Is growth in the consumption of basic health care beneficial? Yes.

Ultimately, people who wish to provide absolute judgment on when and how we should grow or shrink in consumption is more dangerous than unrestrained (by law) growth.
It is not what you where advocating, you where relating growth with benefits . Share out what we have might be better solution.
0 Replies
 
Theaetetus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 27 Feb, 2009 01:04 pm
@Elmud,
Elmud wrote:
Its refreshing to see someone break away temporarily from the intellectual side of things and throw a little humor in there. Thanks Mr. Fidoski.


Except when it is way off-topic and pretty much incoherent drivel within my threads. Not to mention, it is possible to be intellectual and still be humorous.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 05:39:10