The Speed of Time.

So there was nothing and then there was something?

....... I wasn't talking about the beginning of time. You were. I was talking about the infinity of time.

You're mixing ideas. I never said that there was nothing to start with. I said that there was a void. An infinite void. Nothing is not infinite Nor is it finite. Nothing is nothing. The void, however, was something. Particles did not just appear. They were present. perhaps in a wave form but they were present. Then they particle-ized in a single location. Why, perhaps the inadvertent creation of the original observer, perhaps something else. never the less, the particles WERE there, bouncing around in space. They have found a hole in the Universe. This hole is filled with a great deal of "nothing" as you call it but has dimensions. This means that there IS a measurement to the void which once filled the universe in the absence of particle matter.

But nothing is not a void and thats what we had or did not have nothing...a void is describable a nothing can not be described..Ive said it before if you can conceive of nothing you have not conceived it..Before the BB there was nothing....not a void nothing...

But nothing is not a void and thats what we had or did not have nothing...a void is describable a nothing can not be described..Ive said it before if you can conceive of nothing you have not conceived it..Before the BB there was nothing....not a void nothing...

How did you come to that conclusion?

In my experience, something cannot exapnd if it has no where to go. How do you explain that space just magically appeared. Where did the void come from? Did the void magically appear as well? The empty parts of the universe just sort of happened? And where did the matter come from? If there was nothing, then where did it all come from?

Is it not more likely that there was something and that the something expanded to become somethings?

I suppose I would like to see where they are getting this information from.

It is an accepted theory...There is no evidence of a previous universe and they say the BB created this universe...its the biggest mystery i believe man has to comprehend...I saw a bbc stars at night programme that explained it realy well..i will try and find it..

IF, OF COURSE : matter expanded into NOTHING to create SPACE, then it would follow that SOMETHING was created from NOTHING, and which cannot be the CASE. An alternative viewpoint would be that the outer SPACE is an EXPRESSION of an inner SPACE, and into an outer SPACE : the singularity...continuum...expressing that which it it already is. the ONE becoming the one and the many. Something coming from something, in other words...hope that helps...

IF, OF COURSE : matter expanded into NOTHING to create SPACE, then it would follow that SOMETHING was created from NOTHING, and which cannot be the CASE. An alternative viewpoint would be that the outer SPACE is an EXPRESSION of an inner SPACE, and into an outer SPACE : the singularity...continuum...expressing that which it it already is. The ONE becoming the one and the many. Something coming from something, in other words...hope that helps...

NEVER SAID THERE WAS : expressly am saying there is not. The expansion therefore could be a dreamlike state, have you thought of that. The inner dreaming of the outer, but the outer not really existing...except as a dream of the inner...

Sorry but you cant realy even say nothing because that implies something.i will say it again if you think you understand nothing then you dont...What constitutes nothing..what constitutes something ...then consider a universe without even nothing..Its not like an empty box there aint even a box..

That was my point previously when everyone decided to argue that "nothing" was there. That is impossible. There was a void. An absence of everything. Not "nothing", just an absence of everything.

Like I said, I can not conceive nothing but I CAN conceive the lack of everything.

Whats in this void of yours? space?

That was my point previously when everyone decided to argue that "nothing" was there. That is impossible. There was a void. An absence of everything. Not "nothing", just an absence of everything.

Like I said, I can not conceive nothing but I CAN conceive the lack of everything.