The Speed of Time.

If you can't conceive of NOTHING : how can you say NOTHING in order not to be able to conceive it...

Nope they don't...almost but just not quite there..hehe

Say about 284,792,458 miles a second, give or take some :/

-BaC

If its not-not NOTHING then its SOMETHING, and we are not-not talking about SOMETHING...but that which can't be talked about cannot even be mentioned...

We can concieve nothing as an idea which is why we are able to give it a name but we cannot view, imagine, visualize nothing for there is nothing there. When we discuss "nothing" we are discussing the idea in order to have a relative term for that which we cannot comprehend. The "something" is merely the idea which we have attached to "nothing".

We can concieve nothing as an idea which is why we are able to give it a name but we cannot view, imagine, visualize nothing for there is nothing there. When we discuss "nothing" we are discussing the idea in order to have a relative term for that which we cannot comprehend. The "something" is merely the idea which we have attached to "nothing".

Oh no... I comprehend. I have comprehended. I was expounding on the issue. Clarifying my stance if you will. I can conceive of the idea. I just can't actually conceive nothing which is a condition of being something.

Nothing is the absence of something. The idea of nothing is like I said, that place inbetween being awake and dreaming. No thoughts, no space, not time, blankness in the purest form. Absolute lack of anything. That is the idea. Nothing is something beyond my ability to comprehend but I can relate the idea to something which seems vacant of everything.

Now whats even harder we have no time...no time...no time before the BB but no time is no time at all so our nothing in no time did never exist..we never had nothing because we had no time to have nothing...so our universe is it..there never was nothing because we never had time before the BB...bleeding mind boggling...The singularity was the first event ever it started time and the concept of nothing disappears..now do understand if you think you understand nothing you dont...God was the word and the word was god..

We can concieve nothing as an idea which is why we are able to give it a name but we cannot view, imagine, visualize nothing for there is nothing there. When we discuss "nothing" we are discussing the idea in order to have a relative term for that which we cannot comprehend. The "something" is merely the idea which we have attached to "nothing".

You are entering into dark territory here, and one full of holes: we cannot give a name to something that we cannot imagine, or visualise, or view, or any other such. It cannot therefore be an idea, and nor can we conceive of it as such, nor can there ever be a relative term for that which does not exist, and which we cannot comprehend, our comprehension would be absolute, but that absolute comprehension, would not have any bearing on 'NOTHING' : as I said dark territory and mistaken. Do not say that by 'NOTHING' you mean 'SOMETHING' , for if you mean 'SOMETHING', then speak it as such...