@Justin,
Justin;83602 wrote:Well if this in fact were the case, why is it we are declining, gaining weight and our civilization is slowly destroying itself?
I'll address the 'gaining' weight question, because the 'declining' and 'civilization slowly destroying itself' are a bit more multifactorial.
Technology has allowed us to be sedentary, and it has given us access to a huge abundance of calories. This is a phenomenon of the last few generations. A few generations ago there was no such thing even as a school bus, let alone Playstations.
Quite simply our bodies are physiologically adapted to the conditions in which we evolved, which were much different than those we have now.
Justin;83602 wrote:I know that when I go to the doctor they ask me, what are your experiencing.
Yes, we recognize physiologic patterns based on constellations of symptoms.
Justin;83602 wrote:I give them my symptoms and they prescribe medication or otherwise.
Have you ever bothered to ask why they've chosen what they've prescribed?
Chest pain can be caused by an aortic dissection, a pulmonary embolism, a pneumothorax, asthma, pericarditis, gastroesophageal reflux, a heart attack, anxiety, getting hit in the chest with a baseball, or about 1000 other things.
You go to the doctor and complain of chest pain. You don't get a pill for "chest pain" as a result. The doctor will ask you a million other questions to try and characterize your symptoms, including duration, nature, alleviating and aggravating factors, and the doctor will ask you questions about your past medical history, family history, social history, exposures, and medications. Then, the doctor will do a physical examination. Then the doctor may order some diagnostic tests. Then the doctor will treat and/or observe based on how he understands the process that is most likely causing your chest pain. If I think someone is having an asthma attack, I'm going to give them beta-2 agonist bronchodilators and antiinflammatory corticosteroids, because these both
directly truncate the disease process itself. If I think someone is having a pulmonary venous thromboembolism, they get anticoagulated. And sure, I'll treat their pain with pain medication if they need it.
These therapies are
evidence based -- compared with no therapy, people have improved survival and productivity as a result. Giving them a pep talk about deep seated fears isn't going to make the pulmonary embolism go away -- but anticoagulation WILL.
Justin;83602 wrote:When a doctor treats cancer they are treating a symptom of a much greater and unknown cause.
You are misusing the word "symptom". In medical terminology a symptom is something a patient complains of or subjectively experiences. Cancer therapy is directed at killing malignant cells. Period. People undergo potentially carcinogenic exposures and mutations all the time, only a minority of which result in a malignancy. So your "much greater and unknown cause" has a name:
life.
Justin;83602 wrote:Again if this were not the case, how come all this is spreading so quickly?
WHAT is spreading so quickly? Obesity is -- but bubonic plague isn't; smallpox isn't; louse-borne typhus isn't; polio isn't.
Justin;83602 wrote:today, with the installation of fear and lack
Where on earth are you getting this stuff, Justin? Fear and lack? You keep using these words. Tell me
exactly how your point A leads to point B. I'm supposed to just take that for granted?
Justin;83602 wrote:our society has steadily declined yet the number of doctors and scientific findings continue to increase? Our world continues to spiral downward and new diseases are being found all the time.
We find "new diseases" because we have diagnostic technology that didn't exist until very recently. You think that we've had electron microscopes, polymerase chain reaction, and immunocytochemistry since the time of Galen? PCR, which is now invoked in every crime show on television, wasn't even invented until the mid 1980s.
Our state of public health, our longevity, our child mortality, our infant mortality, our nutrition, our hygiene, and nearly every possible measure of wellness has
dramatically improved in the last century, and this is incontrovertable -- and it's true even in impoverished countries. Some diseases have been replaced by others, and others have emerged (just as they always have). Our living conditions, our risks, and our population dynamics have changed our susceptibility -- but to say that our state of health is declining is just ignorant. A century ago the average American life expectancy was around 50 years, 10% of all children died by the age of 1, and as many as 25% died by the age of 5. You want to go back to that?
Justin;83602 wrote:A syndromic diagnosis that ignores the thought vibration of energy within the soul of humanity is ignoring the problem completely.
You've completely lost me. But you and I have a fairly fundamental disagreement about Walter Russell and his work, so we should probably just agree to disagree.