@failures art,
failures art wrote:How is a ban on an assault weapons a violation of our constitutional rights?
We have the right to have them.
failures art wrote:Is it a violation to ban ownership of chemical weapons, cruise missiles, or flame throwers?
No. But there is no right to have them.
I don't think there are many bans on flame throwers though.
failures art wrote:You're intentionally being ignorant of the outcome of letting the ban expire, or you don't give a damn about how this is effecting people's lives in Mexico.
I don't think letting the ban expire had much impact. The world is flooded with assault rifles. Gangs would get them from somewhere else if not from us.
The only things they get from the US, that they could not get somewhere else, are those FN 57 pistols that chew up Kevlar.
And I also think the gangs would kill in some other way if they didn't have assault rifles, so it wouldn't make much difference even if it was possible to cut off their weapons supplies.
But it is certainly true that America's right to have assault weapons trumps every single life in Mexico, so if it really did make a difference, that would just be too bad. (Although I might be willing to tolerate some attempts to interdict gun smuggling so long as it did not impact ordinary gun ownership.)