0
   

Clinton Demands Non-Purient Sex ?

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 05:50 am
Quoth Bill Clinton:

Quote:
When President Bill Clinton signed the bill, he expressed reservations, prompted by the First Amendment,
and he instructed the Justice Department to limit prosecutions
to “wanton cruelty to animals designed to appeal to a prurient interest in sex.”
But since then, the government has used the law in several prosecutions
for trafficking in dogfighting videos.[All emfasis has been added by David.]
Lemme get this straight:
Does this imply that the philosophy of the Clinton Administration
was that Americans' interest in sex must be non-purient?

In the future, if any Americans chance to get involved in sex,
shoud thay strive to exclude any purient thoughts in mind?

ALL sex must be non-purient.

(I wonder if purience is a RICO violation?)

I just wanna be sure that I don 't make any mistakes in the future.





David
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 758 • Replies: 13

 
sullyfish6
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 06:20 am
Check the spelling of the word - prurient.

engineer
 
  3  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 06:42 am
@OmSigDAVID,
No, it means that videos depicting “wanton cruelty to animals designed to appeal to a prurient interest in sex” would be prosecuted. It was about cruelty to animals being used in sex play, not sex play in general.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 08:15 am
@sullyfish6,
sullyfish6 wrote:
Check the spelling of the word - prurient.
Your point is well taken. Clinton had better knowledge of prurient sex than I did. (I dunno if he consulted Monica.)

I will be mindful to spell it correctly.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 08:30 am
@engineer,
engineer wrote:
No, it means that videos depicting “wanton cruelty to animals
designed to appeal to a prurient interest in sex”
would be prosecuted. It was about cruelty to animals being used in sex play, not sex play in general.
That 's off topic, Engineer. There is another thread that EXPLICITLY addresses the point that u have raised.

This thread addresses a different concept, to wit, I re-iterate:
does Clinton imply that an interest in sex shoud be non-prurient
or
that non-prurient sex is preferable, according to Clinton ?
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 11:56 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Your point is well taken. Clinton had better knowledge of prurient sex than I did. (I dunno if he consulted Monica.)


So you are stating that you are asexual?
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 12:03 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
David wrote:
Your point is well taken. Clinton had better knowledge of prurient sex than I did.
(I dunno if he consulted Monica.)


So you are stating that you are asexual?
No, just not as prurient as Clinton.





David
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 12:31 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
No, just not as prurient as Clinton
.

What experts came up with that opinion of the prurient ratio between you and our former president?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 12:53 pm
Clinton Demands Non-Prurient Sex with sheeple.

Will cigars be allowed?
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 12:57 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:
Clinton Demands Non-Prurient Sex with sheeple.

Will cigars be allowed?
Non-lustful ones.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 03:06 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

H2O MAN wrote:
Clinton Demands Non-Prurient Sex with sheeple.

Will cigars be allowed?
Non-lustful ones.


And Cuban ones that Fidel has made special for our first black president.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 21 Apr, 2010 03:15 pm
They might deny being racist, but, our resident righties certainly slip up and show their true colors at times.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Thu 22 Apr, 2010 09:18 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
They might deny being racist, but, our resident righties certainly slip up and show their true colors at times.
Of course: Red, White and Blue.
I am certain that those r the colors that u had in mind, Plain.




David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Thu 22 Apr, 2010 09:21 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
H2O MAN wrote:
Clinton Demands Non-Prurient Sex with sheeple.

Will cigars be allowed?
Non-lustful ones.


And Cuban ones that Fidel has made special for our first black president.
Yea, but what bargains has he committed himself to in exchange for those Red cigars ?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Clinton Demands Non-Purient Sex ?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/14/2024 at 08:19:38
▲ ▼